Incoming from Brandon McCaig:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:32:13AM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> >
> > Is there a command other than "g" which is appropriate when
> > replying to a group?
>
> Some mailing lists don't require a subscription so you should use
> 'g' to reply to those lists so ev
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:32:13AM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Please tell me if I am using the wrong command when attempting
> to reply to a mail list regarding a message on the list. I am
> running Mutt on Debian Squeeze.
>
> In order to reply to your message, I press "g" (for "group
> re
Luis Mochan wrote:
> my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to
> /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link
> pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the
> ...nice description of alternatives...
Some time ago I posted this following in a di
On 12Feb2013 11:31, David Woodfall wrote:
| My .procmailrc-lists is populated with eg:
|
| :0
| * ^.*mutt-users@mutt.org*
| lists/mutt-users@mutt.org/
|
| Which catches mail To or Cc the mailing list, so if I do get a dup it
| will end up at the same place, but now your dup catcher will detect i
On Feb 12, Ed wrote:
> I have this in my mailcap to view images
>
> image/*; /usr/bin/gpicview '%s'; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"
>
> but when I open a message with an image attached mutt tells me there is no
> entry in mailcap, but if I go on to using "v" then the image is displayed.
>
> I tried to
I have this in my mailcap to view images
image/*; /usr/bin/gpicview '%s'; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"
but when I open a message with an image attached mutt tells me there is no
entry in mailcap, but if I go on to using "v" then the image is displayed.
I tried to see what I could find but did not ha
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:33:30PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
# Collapse duplicate messages, but not my
:0 Whc: msgid.lock # posts that I've BCCed, for testing.
* !^From: Erik Christiansen
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 22:22:35 -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I guess there is still some confusion. When you installed
> mutt-patched, mutt was overwritten. The same thing happened to me. In
> my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to
> /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternati
Stefan Wimmer wrote on Sat-09-Feb 13 10:57PM
> * Brendan Cully [2013-02-09 22:38]:
> >On Saturday, 09 February 2013 at 13:27, Gary Johnson wrote:
> >>On 2013-02-09, Brendan Cully wrote:
> >>
> >>>Elinks does work fine to view attachments in color. You can't get
> >>>color when autoviewing though
On 12.02.13 11:31, David Woodfall wrote:
>
> My .procmailrc-lists is populated with eg:
>
> :0
> * ^.*mutt-users@mutt.org*
> lists/mutt-users@mutt.org/
>
> Which catches mail To or Cc the mailing list,
Or in the Subject, or elsewhere. As a hack, it'll probably mostly work
most of the time, beca
On (12/02/13 19:33), Erik Christiansen put forth the
proposition:
On 12.02.13 13:57, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 11Feb2013 15:40, Will Yardley wrote:
| Also, an off-list copy that you receive, but CCd to the list, will not
| have the rfc2369 headers, which mnight explain the inconsistent behavi
- Erik Christiansen [2013-02-12 19:33:30 +1100]
- :
> It has been particularly annoying that in either case the directly
> addressed copy arrives first, so that it is always the list copy which
> goes into duplicates. That resulted in list mail in the personal folder.
> But none of this
On 12.02.13 13:57, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 11Feb2013 15:40, Will Yardley wrote:
> | Also, an off-list copy that you receive, but CCd to the list, will not
> | have the rfc2369 headers, which mnight explain the inconsistent behavior
> | that one user mentioned.
>
> Indeed. That goes both ways
13 matches
Mail list logo
