Re: Problem with Fcc: saved mailbox

2010-12-27 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Jeffery Small [12-27-10 04:11]: > However, after looking through an updated version of the manual, I did > notice the "alternates" command and gave that a try. good > I set it to a list of all the addresses I am using and then tested out > mutt doing the procedure I described above, and that

Re: mailboxes

2010-12-27 Thread Ken Stevens
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:04:02PM +, ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:46:49AM +, ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote: > > > try using the '=' sign rather than the '+' sign. > > > > > > Jamie > > > > I tried that. It did not work. :-( > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > c

Re: mailboxes

2010-12-27 Thread jamie
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:46:49AM +, ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote: > > try using the '=' sign rather than the '+' sign. > > > > Jamie > > I tried that. It did not work. :-( > > Thanks for the suggestion. could i ask, when you say that you change mailboxes and mutt should cycle through the

Re: mailboxes

2010-12-27 Thread jamie
> mailboxes ! > mailboxes +testing > mailboxes +perl > > It is my understanding that when I change mailboxes it should cycle > through the ones with new mail. This is not happening. So, what am I > doing wrong? try using the '=' sign rather than the '+' sign. Jamie

Re: Problem with Fcc: saved mailbox

2010-12-27 Thread Jeffery Small
I wrote: > However, in some circumstances while editing the original message, I > alter the From: line to an alternative address I use with a different > domain name. In this situation, when I exit the text editor, mutt apparently does not scan the hook file and simply sets Fcc: to the default va