Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 19:09:43 +0200, Michael Williams wrote: > $ grep 'FETCH' .muttdebug0 | tail > [...] > 4< * 3709 FETCH (UID 17155 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "20-Sep-2010 17:19:34 > +0100" RFC822.SIZE 126689 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC > MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE C

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:52:37PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > >Are you referring to pthreads or mail therading? > > Mail threading. That's OK. I'd be happy to live with that, since eventually the folder does get fully enumer

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:52:37PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: Are you referring to pthreads or mail therading? Mail threading. me

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > The main issue is that some popular IMAP servers (gmail, exchange), > do not support the SORT extensions, so you wouldn't be able to do > the pageful-at-a-time and still have all of Mutt's current threading > capabilities. Interesti

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:38:33PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:13:05PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: Yes, this is the problem. Mutt expects to see a FETCH response for each message the server says EXISTS. The IMAP standard requires that no "holes" exist in the mess

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:32:54PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Thursday, 23 September 2010 at 14:13, Michael Elkins wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote: > > >On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > >>>4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Se

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:13:05PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > Yes, this is the problem. Mutt expects to see a FETCH response for > each message the server says EXISTS. The IMAP standard requires > that no "holes" exist in the message sequence numbers, and mutt is > not prepared to handle them

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 23 September 2010 at 14:13, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote: > >On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote: > >>>4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 > >>>09:14:57 +0100" RFC822.SIZE 2612 BO

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote: On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote: 4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 09:14:57 +0100" RFC822.SIZE 2612 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TY

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Michael Williams
On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote: >> 4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 09:14:57 >> +0100" RFC822.SIZE 2612 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC >> MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO >> LINES LIST-

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi Michael! On Do, 23 Sep 2010, Michael Williams wrote: > 4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 09:14:57 > +0100" RFC822.SIZE 2612 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC > MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO > LINES LIST

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-23 Thread Michael Williams
Hi Michael, thanks for the reply. On 22 Sep 2010, at 15:56, Michael Elkins wrote: >> However, for larger mailboxes, when I attempt to change, mutt only gets as >> far as saying >> >> Fetching message headers... 3320/3391 (97%) >> >> which remains unchanged for ~5 minutes before I give up.

Re: Inconsisten locale language in mutt 1.5.19

2010-09-23 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:54:00AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: I've set my environment (KDE, ..., mutt) to speak Spanish. As far as mutt concerns, it runs in LANG=es_ES.ISO8859-1 and has set locale="es_ES" in .muttrc. This brings the keybindings line on the top of the screen as: q:Salir d:Sup

Inconsisten locale language in mutt 1.5.19

2010-09-23 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I've set my environment (KDE, ..., mutt) to speak Spanish. As far as mutt concerns, it runs in LANG=es_ES.ISO8859-1 and has set locale="es_ES" in .muttrc. This brings the keybindings line on the top of the screen as: q:Salir d:Sup. u:Recuperar s:Guardar m:Nuevo r:Responder g:Grupo