Re: Ask for "group reply"

2010-05-12 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 13May2010 09:53, Udo Hortian wrote: | I tend to use "reply" accidentally instead of "group reply" if I reply to | messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt | if one wants to use "group reply" instead of "reply" in case that there | is more than one recipient in the

Ask for "group reply"

2010-05-12 Thread Udo Hortian
Dear mutt users, I tend to use "reply" accidentally instead of "group reply" if I reply to messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt if one wants to use "group reply" instead of "reply" in case that there is more than one recipient in the mail one is answering? Udo

Re: External Address Book

2010-05-12 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-05-12, rog...@sdf.org wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:56:18PM -0400, Chuck Smith wrote: >>Just curious. Has anyone tried Goobook? >> >>http://pypi.python.org/pypi/goobook/1.3a1 >> >>It uses Gmail Contacts for your external addressbook. I have been >>using just a few minutes and so far

Re: External Address Book

2010-05-12 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:52:09AM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: > ABook > http://abook.sourceforge.net/ > Abook is a text-based addressbook program designed to use with mutt mail > client. > > Written in C. ...python is a hog on system resources. ;-) Which matters a lot... if you're running on a

Re: External Address Book

2010-05-12 Thread rogerx
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:56:18PM -0400, Chuck Smith wrote: >Just curious. Has anyone tried Goobook? > >http://pypi.python.org/pypi/goobook/1.3a1 > >It uses Gmail Contacts for your external addressbook. I have been using >just a few minutes and so far it is really cool. I have been looking for >a

External Address Book

2010-05-12 Thread Chuck Smith
Just curious. Has anyone tried Goobook? http://pypi.python.org/pypi/goobook/1.3a1 It uses Gmail Contacts for your external addressbook. I have been using just a few minutes and so far it is really cool. I have been looking for a way to sync Gmail Contacts with an addressbook database for Mutt bu

Re: Question on Attachment sent by Mutt

2010-05-12 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:23:43PM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote: > The problem been solved by add "-a" to each attached files. Because I > don't have permissions to upgrade mutt on the server. But all your > advice are very useful for me. This too, you can do, as long as you have enough space in your hom

Re: Question on Attachment sent by Mutt

2010-05-12 Thread Qi Zhang
Thanks All! The problem been solved by add "-a" to each attached files. Because I don't have permissions to upgrade mutt on the server. But all your advice are very useful for me. Thank you very much. Zhang Qi On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > Nathan

Re: Question on Attachment sent by Mutt

2010-05-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:35:05 +0800, Qi Zhang wrote: > My Mutt version is 1.4.2, buildin with Centos 5.4 On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:22:43 -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: > As others have indicated in their examples, you don't need to prefix > each file with "-a". Use "--" to separate the list of at

Re: Question on Attachment sent by Mutt

2010-05-12 Thread Ed Blackman
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:28:47PM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote: But I still have problems. That is: if I use -a $attachments, then only attach one file, others will act as recipient. I should use -a file1 -a file2 instead of -a file1 file2. Am I right? As others have indicated in their examples, you

Re: Question on Attachment sent by Mutt

2010-05-12 Thread Christian Brabandt
On Wed, May 12, 2010 8:51 am, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote: >> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into >> different folders. >> Each receiver has different amount of attachments. > > If I understand correctly, this is tri

Re: Question on Attachment sent by Mutt

2010-05-12 Thread Qi Zhang
Thank you Mr DM But I still have problems. That is: if I use -a $attachments, then only attach one file, others will act as recipient. I should use -a file1 -a file2 instead of -a file1 file2. Am I right? So I made a script can store all file names in one list and begins with "-a", then use: mutt