Hi Patrick!
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:49]:
> > Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values
> > are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells
> > me what values I've set.
m
0n Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:38:50AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
>> I've actually got a folder-hook set to do this:
>> folder-hook . push "~="
mmm, i liked the idea of this folder-hook so i tried it out.
Is it meant to automagically delete duplicate threads ? If so
the following folder-hook
coming from the openbsd community, I know just too well that people
should read the documentation before asking for something in the
mailing list. These guys here are being nice to you, on misc@ they
would have killed you and offered you to an evil god on a satanic
ritual :D (just talking in jest)
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > > If you do not care to help, there are other more helpful people.
> > >
> > > as you wish.
> >
> > Good! Please just ignore and do not response future mails f
bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > If you do not care to help, there are other more helpful people.
> >
> > as you wish.
>
> Good! Please just ignore and do not response future mails from me.
It is not in your best interest to antagonize Pat
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > If you do not care to help, there are other more helpful people.
>
> as you wish.
Good! Please just ignore and do not response future mails from me.
--
regards,
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-2
* bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 22:34]:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > It would *really* be a good time to spend a few minutes glancing thru
> > the very fine mutt documentation which you noted earlier as rtfm!
> Frankly speaking, I can not understand why you keeping t
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> It would *really* be a good time to spend a few minutes glancing thru
> the very fine mutt documentation which you noted earlier as rtfm!
Frankly speaking, I can not understand why you keeping telling people
to rtfm in a support forum. If you do not ca
* Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:49]:
> Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values
> are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells
> me what values I've set.
>
grep color /etc/muttrc ~/.muttrc
--
Patrick Shanahan P
Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values
are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells
me what values I've set.
The problem I'm trying to solve is I'm setting colors, and I'm getting
highlighted colors on my black background. For example, whe
* bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:40]:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Marianne Promberger wrote:
> > in muttrc:
> > set duplicate_threads = yes
> >
> > then:
> >
> > D~=
> >
> > (i.e. ~= )
> >
> > I've actually got a folder-hook set to do this:
> >
> > folder-hook . push "~="
>
> Thank yo
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Marianne Promberger wrote:
> in muttrc:
> set duplicate_threads = yes
>
> then:
>
> D~=
>
> (i.e. ~= )
>
> I've actually got a folder-hook set to do this:
>
> folder-hook . push "~="
Thank you for quick response! That folder-hook is very convenient.
--
regards,
==
On Tuesday, 23 September 2008, 09:10 (UTC+0800), bill lam wrote:
> Hello,
> After forwarding or copying, there are duplicated mails in local
> maibox folder. Is there an method to duplicated mails and only keep a
> copy of each mail? The "Message-ID" field in header section is
> intended to be the
Hello,
After forwarding or copying, there are duplicated mails in local
maibox folder. Is there an method to duplicated mails and only keep a
copy of each mail? The "Message-ID" field in header section is
intended to be the key field.
--
regards,
==
Hello,
Mark Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The annoyance is with overly long addresses, that are wider than my
> > terminal. These addresses are wrapped to the next line(s) and it's
> > continuation lines are marked with the "+" sign. Now, when I click these
> > addresses the newline
On 2008-09-22, "Maruvada, Suryakiran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I need to use mutt with out user intervention. i.e my shell script will
> send my files as attachments to my mail DL automatically.
>
> I tried like this...
>
> Mutt -a attachment1 -a attachment2 -s SampleSubjectLine
Hi ,
I need to use mutt with out user intervention. i.e my shell script will
send my files as attachments to my mail DL automatically.
I tried like this...
Mutt -a attachment1 -a attachment2 -s SampleSubjectLine
<>
This is prompting me to confirm the mail body as well as other items. I
wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 22 at 03:16 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>PS: The !$ pattern isn't mentioned in the manual
>(http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html). What's it supposed to
>do?
It's in the man page:
~$ unreferenced message (req
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 22 at 11:39 AM, quoth Pau:
> I would like to use mutt with screen. My problem is that my defined
> colours (see bottom) are not displayed correctly on screen. I am
> using TERM=xterm-xfree86 in my zshrc, but TERM=screen doens't h
++ 22/09/08 10:19 -0400 - Mark Harrison:
>> The annoyance is with overly long addresses, that are wider than my
>> terminal. These addresses are wrapped to the next line(s) and it's
>> continuation lines are marked with the "+" sign. Now, when I click these
>> addresses the newline and plus sign
> The annoyance is with overly long addresses, that are wider than my
> terminal. These addresses are wrapped to the next line(s) and it's
> continuation lines are marked with the "+" sign. Now, when I click these
> addresses the newline and plus sign are replaced by "+ ", resulting in
> an inv
Hi,
I have this minor but annoying issue. I seem to be unable to fix it...
Currently, I am using mutt with a fairly basic configuration on a server
running Debian to which I am connected using iTerm under OSX 10.5. When
someone sends me an URL in an e-mail, I can click (using command key and
l
Hi Nicolas,
thanks for your quick reply.
You are right. The pattern
!~(~h in-reply-to)
does *approximately* what i need. ;-}
It does, however, show me *some* threaded mails (which it shouldn't), but I
guess that's due to bogus mail-clients not correctly setting the right headers
or so...
But
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-22 13:40 +0200]:
> On some mailinglists there occur spam-mails sporadically.
> I thought of (tagging and) deleting them by limiting mutt to show only mails
> which have no response to them. (Nobody replies to spam-mails! ;-> )
>
> Is this possible?
!~(~h in-reply-to)
Hi list,
I was wondering whether it was possible to 'limit' the index to those mails
which are NOT part of a thread.
On some mailinglists there occur spam-mails sporadically.
I thought of (tagging and) deleting them by limiting mutt to show only mails
which have no response to them. (Nobody repl
* bill lam on Monday, September 22, 2008 at 16:30:00 +0800
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>> * bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-21-08 22:36]:
>>> A related question, how to untag all tagged items?
>>
>> the question mark "?" will give you a help screen. Open it in "index"
>> mode
* Pau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-22 11:40]:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use mutt with screen. My problem is that my defined
> colours (see bottom) are not displayed correctly on screen. I am using
> TERM=xterm-xfree86 in my zshrc, but TERM=screen doens't help.
>
> Typically the background is not
Hi,
I would like to use mutt with screen. My problem is that my defined
colours (see bottom) are not displayed correctly on screen. I am using
TERM=xterm-xfree86 in my zshrc, but TERM=screen doens't help.
Typically the background is not uniform but has white lines randomly displayed.
I don't thi
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Vance Shipley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:34:11AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> } A related question, how to untag all tagged entrys?
>
> Bill,
>
> The tag-entry function (default = 't') key actually toggles
> the tagging of an entry. Bearing that in mind to untag all
>
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-21-08 22:36]:
> > A related question, how to untag all tagged items?
>
> the question mark "?" will give you a help screen. Open it in "index"
> mode to see the tag operations.
Sounds like rtfm.
--
regards,
30 matches
Mail list logo
