On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:44:53AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
:
: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:44:46PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
: >
: > Now if I can only figure out how to keep both entries and get Mutt to
: > let me select between the two methods...
:
: You can. Just put them in you mailcap in
i am currently running Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29) on mandrake 8.2, with a
muttrc created with the automated muttrc builder
(http://mutt.netliberte.org/). When i am reading a message, in the pager
if i am not mistaken, and i want to scroll up to the previous line i
cannot using either the backspace ke
Quoting Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[my infocmp output snipped]
> ...and no bce. Recent versions of screen allow you to set bce in its
> configuration, but you have to install a terminfo entry for screen
> which adds 'bce', so it will work properly.
I fear we might be trying to solve th
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:41:40PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > but what does infocmp show? (screen's terminfo normally doesn't say bce)
>
> Thanks for asking. This is from one of the screen sessions, of course:
>
> [rick@uncle-enzo]
> ~ $ infocmp
Quoting Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> but what does infocmp show? (screen's terminfo normally doesn't say bce)
Thanks for asking. This is from one of the screen sessions, of course:
[rick@uncle-enzo]
~ $ infocmp
# Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /etc/terminfo/s/screen
scree
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-11 23:24 +0200]:
> A lot of the mails i have problems with are form David (no GMX).
IIRC, the last time a thread came up where people were having problems in
David's emails not verifying, the problem was traced to an MTA that was
improperly quoting/un
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 23:25:41 +0200] wrote:
> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 22:29]:
> >* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
> >> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 21:33]:
> A lot of the mails i have problems with are form David (no
> GMX). I checked
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 22:29]:
>* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
>> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 21:33]:
>
>> >That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
>> >those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
>> >has a
I'm leaving my job to return to school, and my new priorities mean i can't
really keep up with the traffic on the mutt lists anymore. Also, mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will start bouncing soon. However, if anyone has any
questions about S/MIME or the index_context patch*, you can reach me at
[EMAIL
Hi,
* Will Yardley [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
> The postconf tool is also very useful since it lets you
> query both default and current settings, and even edit
> settings if necessary.
Such a feature would be cool for mutt, too. Finding config
mistakes was easier by just reporting non-def
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 22:10:53 +0200] wrote:
> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 21:33]:
> >That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
> >those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
> >has a broken mbox parser I can verify a few of those bad
> >mail
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 21:33]:
>* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 21:28:53 +0200] wrote:
>> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 01:30]:
>
>> > :source contrib/gpg.rc
>
>> >does it help?
>
>> Nope.
>
>That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
>those proble
David Champion wrote:
> * On 2002.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
>> harder to misconfigure).
> Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're
> doing
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 21:28:53 +0200] wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 01:30]:
> > :source contrib/gpg.rc
> >does it help?
> Nope.
That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
has a broken mbox
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:04:09PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> When I ssh in from my X11 desktop to my server (both Debian 3.0) and
> start sessions under GNU Screen (v. 3.09.11), among which are Mutt (v.
> 1.3.28) instances, I get a weird effect with Mutt's internal pager:
>
> If I highlight text
Hi,
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 01:30]:
>* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-10 21:19]:
>> For quite some time I have a problem veryfying PGP signatures.
>> I get 'Falsche Unterschrift' (wrong signature) messages on
>> these mails though others seem to be able to verify
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:22:19 -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> > try:
> >
> > send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'set from="David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'
> >
> > ?
> >
> > does that help?
>
> Actually, it did, but only on the second atte
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> Actually, it did, but only on the second attempt. I'm guessing that
> mutt is applying the send-hooks before asking who I'm addressing the
> e-mail to.
>
> Which at least is a different problem. How do I fix this one?
from the ma
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:22:19 -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:15:43AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> > send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set from="David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> >
> > Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) complains that Benfell is an unknown
> > variable. I'm subscribed t
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-11 11:20]:
> Hi, I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my
> machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly
> make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
>
> Regards Amit
I'm using sSMTP.
ftp://metala
At 13:30 +0200 11 Jul 2002, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > Not that I recall. It's always pretty much just resubmitted the message
> > as is, but with new envelope recipients.
>
> Shouldn't it add a "Resend-To:" header?
Hi David,
On Tuesday, July 9, 2002 at 4:10:21 PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt-users-199919-200207.mbox.bz2
> It's 12.3 GB, ranging from 10/1999 to present. I won't keep it up for
> long -- a few days, maybe.
Thank you very much, David! A little more tha
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:20:53AM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I
> find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt
> connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Sendmail configuration to to what
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * On 2002.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
> > harder to misconfigure).
>
> Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (tha
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:44:46PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Thanks to you and John Iverson and Will Yardley for the responses.
> It turned out to be my mailcap entry. I had this:
>
> text/html; links %s; nametemplate=%s.html
>
> when I really needed this:
>
> text/html; links -d
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:15:43AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set from="David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) complains that Benfell is an unknown
> variable. I'm subscribed to a lot of mailing lists with a variety of
> e-mail addresses;
* On 2002.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> postfix is also a bit less complicated than sendmail to configure (and
> harder to misconfigure).
Sendmail configuration is usually quite easy (that is, unless you're
doing complicated things with it).
Hello all,
I have a very complicated mutt configuration which includes several
lines in the form:
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set from="David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) complains that Benfell is an unknown
variable. I'm subscribed to a lot of mailing lists with a va
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-11-02 08:38]:
> * W. D. McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-11 06:00]:
> > (my vimrc wraps, sorry.)
>
> "i was forced". sheesh.
>
> (1) change your vimrc
> (2) change the setting
> (3) :set paste
> (4) use 'pastetoggle'
>
> knowledge is power!
>
> Sven
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Chris Grossmann wrote:
> Just want to add that I switched to postfix (from sendmail)
> about 3 months ago and have never looked back..
I wonder if anybody on the list knows of any sites comparing the
performance and reliability of both Sendmail and Postfix? I can
only find
* W. D. McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-11 06:00]:
> (my vimrc wraps, sorry.)
"i was forced". sheesh.
(1) change your vimrc
(2) change the setting
(3) :set paste
(4) use 'pastetoggle'
knowledge is power!
Sven
--
..and give us our daily RTFM..
Just want to add that I switched to postfix (from sendmail)
about 3 months ago and have never looked back..
I found the configuration to be easy, especially compared to
sendmail.
Will Yardley wrote:
> John Iverson wrote:
> > * On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> I would l
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > Hrm. That sounded like a good explanation. Was there any change
> > in the "bounce" function?
>
> Not that I recall. It's always pretty much just resubmitted the message
> as is, but with new envelope recipients.
Shouldn't it a
John Iverson wrote:
> * On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my machine. I
>> find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I directly make Mutt
>> connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
>
> Not with just Mutt by itself,
* On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to use mutt without the sendmail server on my
> machine. I find sendmail configuration quite abstruse. Can I
> directly make Mutt connect to my ISP's outgoing SMTP server.
Not with just Mutt by itself, but you might want to
35 matches
Mail list logo
