Mutt 1.5 maildir_trash

2002-06-27 Thread John Payne
What I'd like to is have mutt move any deleted messages to my =.Trash maildir folder, with the maildir trash flag upon syncronise, rather than just leave the messages in the current folder as it currently does. Is there a better way than redefining '$' to tag deleted messages, save tagged message

dazuko brakes mutt

2002-06-27 Thread Jens Georg
Hi! dazuko (http://www.dazuko.org), a kernel-module/tool for "file access control" (used by the H+BEDV Virus Scanner antivir) breaks the ability of mutt detecting new mails... gave me a hard time the last two days... -- * Origin: http://www.jensgeorg.d

folder-hook and IMAP folders (needing a password)

2002-06-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre
We've just switch to IMAP here. I had the following line in my .muttrc: folder-hook . "push -" but when the password is required, the character '-' is pushed as the first character of the password (well, I think this is the problem, because the connection is refused). Is there a way to choose

Re: ssl_socket_read (MEMORY_ERROR)

2002-06-27 Thread Jacob Elder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:07:20PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Thu 27-Jun-2002 at 11:44:34AM -0400, Jacob Elder wrote: > > > > I had been using mutt's imap support to read my mail for several > > months, but about two weeks ago I started seeing this error whenever I > > try to open my inbox:

Re: ssl_socket_read (MEMORY_ERROR)

2002-06-27 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 27-Jun-2002 at 11:44:34AM -0400, Jacob Elder wrote: > > I had been using mutt's imap support to read my mail for several > months, but about two weeks ago I started seeing this error whenever I > try to open my inbox: > > ssl_socket_read (MEMORY_ERROR) Courier-imap has a MAXPERIP setting

ssl_socket_read (MEMORY_ERROR)

2002-06-27 Thread Jacob Elder
I had been using mutt's imap support to read my mail for several months, but about two weeks ago I started seeing this error whenever I try to open my inbox: ssl_socket_read (MEMORY_ERROR) Sylpheed still works, so I'm pretty sure there's something wrong with mutt. I'm using Debian 3.0: ii mutt

Re: abook and forwarding mail (was: Re: Adressbook?)

2002-06-27 Thread Richard Curnow
* Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-27]: > David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...and then Jussi Ekholm said... > >> One thing that annoys me a great deal is, that AFAIK you can't, for > >> example, forward/bounce emails with abook. At least I can't find > >> anything somehow relat

abook and forwarding mail (was: Re: Adressbook?)

2002-06-27 Thread Jussi Ekholm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...and then Jussi Ekholm said... >> One thing that annoys me a great deal is, that AFAIK you can't, for >> example, forward/bounce emails with abook. At least I can't find >> anything somehow related to it, but

Re: save the mutt output

2002-06-27 Thread Paul Stoeber
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:49:40PM +0200, Arnaud De Timmerman wrote: > i'm using mutt (1.4) on the command line on a RH7.0 box > is there a way to save the "output" of mutt, i mean, the content it sends to > sendmail ? > > a file i could use with : > > echo "my body" | mutt -

save the mutt output

2002-06-27 Thread Arnaud De Timmerman
hi, i'm using mutt (1.4) on the command line on a RH7.0 box is there a way to save the "output" of mutt, i mean, the content it sends to sendmail ? a file i could use with : echo "my body" | mutt -a attach -s "my subject" -o OUTPUT [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat OUTPUT | sendmail [

Re: status_format

2002-06-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Sadiq Al-Lawatia [02-06-27 10:53:30 +0200] wrote: > Is there a way of getting %f to just display the mailbox > name rather than the full pathname of it? I have mailboxes > nested in sub-directories and the name run off off the > screen, so having just the mailbox name would really make > it

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Robert Ian Smit [02-06-27 10:54:28 +0200] wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:04AM +0200, Michael Mauch wrote: > > This cannot work. The redirection (">") is a shell feature, but > > --command does not start a shell, it only spawns the executable given. > > Try: > > gnome-terminal --

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-27 Thread Michael Tatge
Vikram Goyal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > Hello Dear Mutters, > > I have defined a folder-hook as: > folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash" > > But the error coming is 'push too many arguments' I can't see why you need the push command here. folder-hook !Trash "unset maildir_trash" sh

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-27 Thread Cedric Duval
Vikram Goyal wrote: > How can I prevent the action of saving messages if their are no tagged > messages according to the pattern. Nicolas has a patch for this. http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.html -- Cedric

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-27 Thread Vikram Goyal
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:17:29PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > Please do NOT reply to random messages, create a new thread instead. > Sorry for the goof up. > try > folder-hook !Trash "push 'unset maildir_trash'" > This problem is solved. But now I am having a problem further down in the ho

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-27 Thread Robert Ian Smit
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:04AM +0200, Michael Mauch wrote: > This cannot work. The redirection (">") is a shell feature, but > --command does not start a shell, it only spawns the executable given. > Try: > > gnome-terminal --command='sh -c "echo foo >foo.txt"' > or > gnome-terminal --c

Re: browsing folders

2002-06-27 Thread Robert Ian Smit
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:46:26AM -0400, SB wrote: > My procmailrc moves mails to different files(folders). > Mutt opens spool mail when I start it. Is there an easy > way to browse and view folders, the folders highlighted > when there is new mail. > (like pine, Outlook Express). Most certain