Hello,
in my .muttrc file I set the option:
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending mail (sendmail) shows no affect in taking this address in the
>From Header (I use a genericstable).
How can change this so that my Header is writen with the set from value?
Oliver
--
WARNING! POISON! BREATHING THE VAPOR, S
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 17:32 -0700]:
> Also, if resend is the way to go ... is there a way to get messages that
> are resent (and possibly edited) to be saved the same way that outgoing
> messages are via set record=?
There was a bug. It now works fine (sorry, don't know exact
Hi,
* Benjamin Pflugmann [2002-06-04 01:24:14 CEST] wrote:
> Maybe I completely miss your point, as I am not sure why you would
> want to do that.
...because I'm lazy. But I could think of other purposes as
well for a ``real'' batch mode, for example, when I want to
forward a bunch of mails to
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 23:07:26 -0400, Mike Arrison wrote:
> Mutters,
> I, like most of you, have more than one address I send from. I
> use folder hooks to "set from", "my_hdr From", and "my_hdr Reply-To".
> This works perfectly except when I forget to change to the right folder
> bef
On Mon, Jun 3, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > Anyway, I wanted to change the indicator, for
> > example, for messages marked for deletion.
>
> color index blue default ~D
No, the indicator. See below.
> > Can the indicator color not be
> > changed like the index and such?
>
> color indicat
Mutters,
I, like most of you, have more than one address I send from. I
use folder hooks to "set from", "my_hdr From", and "my_hdr Reply-To".
This works perfectly except when I forget to change to the right folder
before sending a message.
So when I find myself at the compose menu
Hey people.
Is there a way to use scoring as a primary sort method but still have
threading take effect? I tried putting threads as an aux sort, but it just
sort of groups them together, it doesn't thread them.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pu
Adam--
...and then Adam Fields said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:36:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > Welcome!
%
% Thanks!
*grin*
%
% > % I can't find the answers in the docs.
% > %
% > % 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
% > %2000 messages, and I
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:32:35PM -0700, jennyw wrote:
> Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments? I do
> this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
>
Name: mime_forward
Type: quadoption
Default: no
When set, the message you are f
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-04 00:32]:
> Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments?
> I do this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
how about "bounce"? and then reply to the message,
but then exchange the address of the former sender
with the
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 14:07]:
> So sprach Sven Guckes am 2002-05-27 um 20:28:54 +0200 :
> > dejavu. how about using a not-dotted file in a dot-dir,
> > ie +.dir/file, eg +.secret/froschteich ?
>
> ? I don't get it. Maildir has just three subdirectories,
> new, cur a
Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments? I do
this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
Also, if resend is the way to go ... is there a way to get messages that
are resent (and possibly edited) to be saved the same way that outgoing
messages are vi
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:36:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Welcome!
Thanks!
> % I can't find the answers in the docs.
> %
> % 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
> %2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
>
> You can limit your view to ju
Hi.
On Tue 2002-06-04 at 00:50:01 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
> That is sort of ``batch'', I guess. I miss one-by-one
> instead of all-at-once. It would be nice if I could tag
> messages I want to reply to so that I can answer each
> individual mail instead of a mass reply...
Maybe I complet
Hi,
* John Iverson [2002-06-04 23:51:06 CEST] wrote:
> * On Mon, 03 Jun 2002, Adam Fields wrote:
> > 2) What's the right way to do batch refiling,
> >particularly of mailing lists?
> You could, for example, ('T' by default) all
> messages over 2 weeks old using the pattern "~d >2w".
> The
* On Mon, 03 Jun 2002, Adam Fields wrote:
> 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder
> with 2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
Open the folder, then do a limit ('l' by default) using the
pattern "~m 190-200".
> 2) What's the right way to do batch ref
Hi,
* Adam Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-03 23:04]:
>1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
> 2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
You have to open the whole thing, but you can limit it to a subset
afterwards. Use 'l'.
>2) What's the right
Adam --
...and then Adam Fields said...
%
% I'm new to mutt (moving from mh-e), and I have two questions for which
Welcome!
% I can't find the answers in the docs.
%
% 1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
%2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 19
I'm new to mutt (moving from mh-e), and I have two questions for which
I can't find the answers in the docs.
1) Is there a way to open part of a folder? Say I have a folder with
2000 messages, and I want to only look at, say, 190-200?
2) What's the right way to do batch refiling, particularly
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 17:17:10 +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
> >> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
> >> only the first message. Is there any
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:17:57PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
> % to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
> % occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
> % email where I
Jussi --
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
%
% This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
% to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
% occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
% email where I was told, that I wasn
This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
occasions (the two or three incidents I mentioned) I have received an
email where I was told, that I wasn't subscribed to mutt-users. Here's
the email I got (l
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-02 17:55]:
> I am playing with more colors for the index. Way too
> cool. I can't believe I didn't do this stuff earlier.
;-)
> Anyway, I wanted to change the indicator, for
> example, for messages marked for deletion.
color index blue default ~D
* Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-03 11:02]:
> I'ld like to know how I can have different
> signatures depending on the recipient.
> I'd like to have a default signature which is always
> used except for specific recipient addresses
> (mailing lists) for which I'ld like to
> have a dif
* blitzkrieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-02 23:03]:
> I've read the changelogs and I've noticed that the 1.4 is able to
> know if there are two (or more) occurences of the same email in a
> mailbox. Is possible to delete duplicate emails? (not one by one,
> e.g. press X and it deletes all dup ma
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:44:56AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Dan, et al --
>
> ...and then Dan Boger said...
> %
> % On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> % > It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
> % > tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, onl
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
% > It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
% > tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the first article of that
% > thread got marked read...
%
% try ;wN (T
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
> tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the first article of that
> thread got marked read...
try ;wN (Tagged-SetFlag-New)
:)
--
Dan Boger
Linux MVP
brainbench.c
Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
>> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
>> only the first message. Is there any work-around for this? Would be nice
>> to be able to mark a big bunch of
So sprach Will Yardley am 2002-05-21 um 15:10:19 -0700 :
> i'm pretty sure i've used symlinks in both directions and never had a
> problem either way.
I'm now using symlinks from ML-MUTT-USERS -> .ML-MUTT-USERS and
everybody is happy.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (ge
So sprach Sven Guckes am 2002-05-27 um 20:28:54 +0200 :
> dejavu. how about using a not-dotted file in a dot-dir,
> ie +.dir/file, eg +.secret/froschteich ?
? I don't get it. Maildir has just three subdirectories, new, cur and
tmp. And to access a Maildir, you specify the name of the director
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-03 14:01:38 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % > % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
> % > % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
> %
> % > Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full
> % > of references,
> %
>
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% > % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% > % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
%
% > Well, it gets even better...
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-03 13:16:43 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
> % that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
> Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references,
Not over here.
> and then *y
Michael Herman wrote:
> > Can someone point me into the right direction how I can
> > accomplish this task?
> send-hook. Check out www.mutt.org and RTFM on this topic.
And patterns (hint: ~l and ~A).
--
Cedric
Martin --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% I'm running the latest mutt (1.4i?).
Yep.
%
% For some reason (?), the list of current mail messages was moved to 'inbox'.
% OK, I'm not sure why, but I can deal with that.
Sounds like $move is set to yes.
%
% When I switch my folder be
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:06:59 +0200
Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'ld like to know how I can have different signatures
> depending on the recipient.
>
> Therefore I'ld like to have a default signature which is
> always used except for specific recipient
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
...
%
% Good, so your References: will hopefully re-appear? It seems
% that your mails only have In-Reply-To.
Well, it gets even better... My reply to Sven was full of references,
and then *your* reply to me had only two, and so the Refs have
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-03 04:44:10 CEST] wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% > % I originally meant the '-Q' switch which has the advantage
%
% > Oh, neat! Now I suppose I have a reason to dig into 1.5.1
% > already :-)
Hi Mutt pals,
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:28:34AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Mads --
>
>
> Hey, awesome! Would you care to be part of the mutt RPM team? Drop a
> note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you can contribute. We have one
> SuSE guy but I don't know that he has more than 6.x...
No. I
Hi,
I'ld like to know how I can have different signatures
depending on the recipient.
Therefore I'ld like to have a default signature which is
always used except for specific recipient addresses (mailing
lists) for which I'ld like to have a different signature
attache
42 matches
Mail list logo
