Re: folder-hook and push conflicts with imap?

2002-05-24 Thread Dan Boger
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 01:41:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-22 15:58]: > > is there a way to do what I want to happen (automagically > > delete dups in each folder) without using push? > > procmail - message id cache - nuff said. > > Sven > > -- > #

Re: vi :s vs sed

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-12 13:46]: > If you are good at sed, you can use > sed to filter your files while in vi: > :1,$ ! sed "s/Find/Replace/" this is *so* much better than :%s/Find/Replace/ *snort* > If you mess up, u undoes any number > of edits. [Cntrl]R undoes the undos.

Re: Internet Mail Service - RIP!

2002-05-24 Thread Patrick
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-24-02 18:49]: > * Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-20 18:16]: > > I've verified that all messages that 'breaks' > > my threads have the following header > > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) > > so, you are right, it's a M$ problem.

Re: mutt colors with X

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* VB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-12 05:03]: > I have mutt color settings that work just fine in console mode. > But when I use mutt from X/gnome, it's all just green on black > background. How can I make the color settings work in X? this does not sem to be a mutt problem, right? it's probably

Re: Internet Mail Service - RIP!

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-20 18:16]: > I've verified that all messages that 'breaks' > my threads have the following header > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) > so, you are right, it's a M$ problem. This header is added by > Microsoft Outlook working on a M$ Ex

Re: folder-hook and push conflicts with imap?

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-22 15:58]: > is there a way to do what I want to happen (automagically > delete dups in each folder) without using push? procmail - message id cache - nuff said. Sven -- # Block duplicate messages that you receive when someone CCs you # on a reply to a

Re: Listing Mailboxes problem

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Rory Campbell-Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-23 11:38]: > I just updated my mailbox listing in my muttrc file and now I'm not > getting the old '2 to go' and automatic selection of unread mailboxes. an old one, eh? so - how was it solved then? do you mind giving a more detailed description

Re: Setting folder_format for attachments only

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Andre Bonhote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-24 09:14]: > folder-hook !.*Mail.* 'set folder_format="%3C %t %N %8s %f"' > It looks like it's matching for ALL folders.. please explain the pattern! i am sure we can find the problem more easily then... > -- > Real programmers use "cat > a.out" *ya

Re: sort incoming mail to different folders

2002-05-24 Thread Sven Guckes
* Romano B. Fonbuena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-24 15:35]: > is it possible for mutt to have the ability > of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers > into different folders, sort of like a builtin > procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? (1) "I could tell you - but then I'd

Re: sort incoming mail to different folders

2002-05-24 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Romano B. Fonbuena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it possible for mutt to have the ability > of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers > into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail > for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail?

Re: sort incoming mail to different folders

2002-05-24 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Romano B. Fonbuena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-05-24 17:26]: >is it possible for mutt to have the ability >of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers >into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail >for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? No, you should use Fetchmail and Maild

Re: sort incoming mail to different folders

2002-05-24 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:21:16AM +0800, Romano B. Fonbuena wrote: > sorry for bothering, but how about sending read mail > onto specified folders instead of the default +mbox then? > i'm still testing *-hooks and other settings which might > do the trick without the need for fetchmail, anyway >

Re: sort incoming mail to different folders

2002-05-24 Thread Michael Elkins
Romano B. Fonbuena wrote: > is it possible for mutt to have the ability > of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers > into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail > for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? No, you want to use fetchmail+procmail to do this.

sort incoming mail to different folders

2002-05-24 Thread Romano B. Fonbuena
is it possible for mutt to have the ability of sorting incoming messages from remote POP3 servers into different folders, sort of like a builtin procmail for those who uses mutt's fetch-mail? -- Romano B. Fonbuena email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnupg: 0xDF5AE5B2

Re: Putting finishing touches on mutt

2002-05-24 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Andy Saxena spake thus: > Hmmm... I have seen this said a few times, however I don't see an "=3D" > sign in front of the mail folders. I use the mbox format

Setting folder_format for attachments only

2002-05-24 Thread Andre Bonhote
Hi there! It happens that I have to attach several files to a mail, some of which have quite long filenames. In order to read the filenames wholly, I often have to enlarge my Xterm, and this is not what I want. Now, I'd like to either have the possibility to scroll to the left and right side in