* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/04/10 04:08]:
> This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
>
> I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work which I
> want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will be gratefully
> appreciated.
maybe this might help y
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:10:06AM -0400, Robert Conde wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:50:49AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yep, I have just looked into and sucessfully installed lbdb, it was just
> > what I was looking for. However I have to pass a query string to lbdb,
> > so I am ju
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:50:49AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep, I have just looked into and sucessfully installed lbdb, it was just
> what I was looking for. However I have to pass a query string to lbdb,
> so I am just working out how to display all entries in the system.
I have inst
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-09 19:18 -0700]:
> Gerhard Häring wrote:
> > * John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-09 21:41 -0400]:
>
> >> This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
> >>
> >> I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work
> >> which I
On 04/10/02, 04:02:02AM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote:
> I've done that recently. I used Mozilla on Windows to import the PST
> files. Then hunted down where Mozilla actually has his files.
> c:/Documents and Settings//AppData/Mozilla or similar it was in my
> case. Mozilla saves its mails in
Gerhard Häring wrote:
> * John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-09 21:41 -0400]:
>> This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
>>
>> I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work
>> which I want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will
>> be gratefully
* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-09 21:41 -0400]:
> This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
>
> I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work which
> I want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will be
> gratefully appreciated.
I've done that
This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work which I
want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will be gratefully
appreciated.
--
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!
Christoph --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello again,
Hi!
%
% I tried a little and i think this Problem is NOT mutts problem.
Of course it isn't ;-)
% I tried some biffs and they all had the same problem.
% (except mailcheck). So i think it either procmail or
% fetchmail do
Hello again,
I tried a little and i think this Problem is NOT mutts problem.
I tried some biffs and they all had the same problem.
(except mailcheck). So i think it either procmail or
fetchmail do something strange to the mails.
I will just have to wait a little until there are enough new mails
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > Search the manual for "wrap" and see for yourself. Pay particular
% > attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapmargin.
%
% I did it. I set smart_wrap and markers, but the manual don't say
09-Apr-02 at 15:55, Eduardo Gargiulo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Search the manual for "wrap" and see for yourself. Pay particular
> > attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapmargin.
>
> I did it. I set smart_wrap and markers, but the manu
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Search the manual for "wrap" and see for yourself. Pay particular
> attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapmargin.
I did it. I set smart_wrap and markers, but the manual don't say
nothing about wrapmargin. I'm using mutt 1.2.5i. Could wrapma
dgc --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% * On 2002.04.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
% * "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > Why not a quick hack that uses mutt's, or whatever regex library mutt is
% > using? I don't get the perl source bit...
%
% Oops. I did mean mutt's rege
Rafael --
...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said...
%
% Hi there.
Hello!
%
% I'm using the compressed folders patch/feature, and running this list in
% such a folder, with fcc-hook, so if I post a message here, it should (and it
You should never have mail delivered to a compressed folder. Just
* On 2002.04.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why not a quick hack that uses mutt's, or whatever regex library mutt is
> using? I don't get the perl source bit...
Oops. I did mean mutt's regex.c -- just a typo.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Hi all.
Hello!
%
% How can I set up mutt, to wrap the text of incomming messages to a
% specified number of columns?
Search the manual for "wrap" and see for yourself. Pay particular
attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapm
Christoph --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% * Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:18AM -0500 , schrieb David T-G:
...
% >
% > So you had, say, messages one through four in your mailbox. When you
% > return, they as well as a new message five are all marked old, even
% > though you've neve
Hi there.
This is a feature request ;)
I did customize the to_chars so I get more comfortable with the message
index, but I don't feel the feature is 'complete' if I can change only some
of the Flags appearance... why are ones available for the user to change
(list, adressed, sent) and others are
Hi there.
I'm using the compressed folders patch/feature, and running this list in
such a folder, with fcc-hook, so if I post a message here, it should (and it
does) stay here, but when I hit 'send' at the compose menu, I got a
mail-sent hint, followed witch a "Mailbox was corrupted" one, which s
Hi all.
How can I set up mutt, to wrap the text of incomming messages to a
specified number of columns?
TIA
--
Eduardo Gargiulo
ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org
* Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:18AM -0500 , schrieb David T-G:
> % > * Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:45:02PM +0200 , schrieb Michael Tatge:
> % > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> ...
> % > > > I start mutt with the -y option to see which mailboxes contain new mails.
> % > > > If
Chris --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% replied to Michael insted of mutt-users, sorry:
BTW, you can bounce your saved copy to mutt-users (perhaps after tweaking
your address, if you use a specific one as I do) to avoid the extra layer
of quoting and resultant confusion. Forwarding,
replied to Michael insted of mutt-users, sorry:
- Forwarded message from chris -
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:33:21 +0200
> To: Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Mails are always tagged as old but unread
>
>
> * Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:45:02PM +0200 , schrieb Michael T
09-Apr-02 at 09:57, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> % have the same calibre of client as you do, I imagine, since I'm in
> % Morocco. Guru status can be rapidly acheived in a place where real Gurus
> % all left and went to the US years ago ;-)
>
> Hmmm... Good point. Any room for more f
Dave --
...and then Dave Smith said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
% [snip]
% > > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
% > I think
Tim --
...and then Tim Kennedy said...
%
% On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
%
% Hi, David.
Hello!
%
% I just tested, and I can indeed write back the new flag to my mailbox.
Hey, cool!
% Both on a Cyrus IMA
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:59:25AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Possibly so. Meanwhile, if you *can* write a 'N'ew flag back to any
> mailbox, I'll start bugging root!
yup, works, no problems :) bug away!
--
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg26931/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
[snip]
> > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
> I think that's the WU IMAP implementation...
It looks identic
Dan --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
...
% > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
...
% > incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
%
% I think t
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> so I don't know for sure what IMAP server we're running. It's not worth
> further checking unless my understanding is out of date or otherwise
> incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
>
Hi, David.
I just tested, and I can
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 09-Apr-02 at 09:10, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% > Heh :-) While I'd love to, I'm usually just the scummy contractor
...
% > enough work to do on the *NIX side, anyway.
%
% I get my own way as a contractor, as much as possible. But then I
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
>
> [zero] [9:39am] ~> telnet localhost 143
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
> ^]
> tel
09-Apr-02 at 09:10, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Heh :-) While I'd love to, I'm usually just the scummy contractor
> brought in to help clean up the mess, and somehow that never involves
> properly trashing ("replace it with Linux!" "oh, shut up") or even
> properly configuring all of
09-Apr-02 at 09:31, David Collantes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote :
> On 04-09-2002 at 08:56 EDT, Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Set your server to automatically purge Deleted Messages. They won't ever
> > use it to store mail again ;-)
> [...]
>
> How are you accomplishing th
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
%
% * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote:
% > Who needs urlview?
%
% I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea
% to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-)
Perhaps he should have phrased it as "who would
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:27:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% > Or am I missing your point?
%
% yes, you are :) why can't you go back and mark a message 'N' again?
It's my understanding that the IMAP design does not allow the client to
write
Hi,
* Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote:
> Who needs urlview?
I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea
to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-)
Cheers, Rocco.
msg26921/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:27:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % > Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
> % > for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
> %
> % why not? works
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
% > for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
%
% why not? works for me... The only
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
> for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
why not? works for me... The only time I wished for a trash box was
when I notied a lot of t
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 09-Apr-02 at 08:00, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
...
% > understood the Deleted Messages folder and why some people keep every
% > darned thing in there... It's a real hell for SysAdmins trying to manage
% > disk space!) into some other fold
On 04-09-2002 at 08:56 EDT, Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Set your server to automatically purge Deleted Messages. They won't ever
> use it to store mail again ;-)
[...]
How are you accomplishing this? Is that a special IMAP server? I use IMAP
from Washington University and I d
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> % P.S. I'd be using mutt already but the native WIN32 mutt from
> % http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt just exits on me at the prompt
> % without doing anything; Cygwin mutt doesn't have URLVIEW; and my
>
> So you'd rather be stuck in some other mail program
Hello everybody,
I start mutt with the -y option to see which mailboxes contain new mails.
If I enter a mailbox which was marked with a "N" , all mails in this
mailbox are marked with an "O" instead of an "N".
Any hints ??
Greetings Christoph
--
gpg fingerprint: 88DA B106 D973 B2AF 7CCB 725A
09-Apr-02 at 08:00, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Your best bet is probably a trash folder implementation, where you throw
> away messages that you don't really want to throw away (I've never
> understood the Deleted Messages folder and why some people keep every
> darned thing in there.
dgc --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% * On 2002.04.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
% * "Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > Alas! David T-G spake thus:
...
% > > % Use perl or python or egrep of emacs or some of the more modern vi
...
% > > recall that egrep is *not* the sa
Thomas --
...and then Thomas Baker said...
%
% Dear all,
%
% I have found all of the following "set" commands:
%
% set nomove
% set move=no
% unset move
Yep.
%
% Do they all mean the same thing? Are some forms "preferred"?
Yep. Nope.
% Do all "set" commands support s
Magnus --
...and then Magnus Therning said...
%
% My first post! Jippie!
Welcome!
%
% So, my question:
% There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
% should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
Well, some of that is based on the PGP method itself.
Van --
...and then VB said...
%
% In MS Outlook, actual deletion from the imap server is a two-step process.
Right; that's IMAP in general.
% Is mutt capable of simulating this behavior; does it retain the "marked for
% deletion" and "purged" distinction? So far, mutt takes my messages off o
Dear all,
I have found all of the following "set" commands:
set nomove
set move=no
unset move
Do they all mean the same thing? Are some forms "preferred"?
Do all "set" commands support such alternatives?
Tom
P.S. I'd be using mutt already but the native WIN32 mutt fro
begin Magnus Therning quotation:
>
> So, my question:
> There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
> should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
> application/pgp, and some (e.g. kmail) relies on the body contents to
> find out. Which is the 'correct'
My first post! Jippie!
So, my question:
There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
application/pgp, and some (e.g. kmail) relies on the body contents to
find out. Which is the 'correct' way?
--
Magnus Therni
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:12:59PM -0800, VB wrote:
> >
> > I perused http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#commands and I did
> > not see that mutt follows the MS Outlook conventions I described. I saw
> > "mh_purge" is related to "renaming deleted messages," but it's not clear if
> >
08-Apr-02 at 09:21, VB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Once I mark a message as deleted and exit mutt, where does it move the
> message? I.e., is the message recoverable/undeletable after exiting mutt?
Depends on your config a little, but in general if you have deleted a
message, and when you exit
55 matches
Mail list logo
