Re: mailbox question

Moin, * Matthias Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-03-25 22:26]: >I'm subscribed to several mailing lists which are sent >to 2 mail accounts. I'm using fetchmail to retrieve the >mails that are then stored in /var/spool/mail/matthias. > >I'd like mutt to check whether a mail came from a mailing >list

Re: threading question -> sample mailbox?

David Ellement wrote: > > I also see this. Here's an example from this list. it also seems to happen when the parent moves out of the top of the display. 173 rDF Mar 22 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1.6K) Fwd: Re: spews collateral damage 174 rDL Mar 22 Dallas Bethune (1.7K) |*> 175 DL Mar 23 J

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:14:14:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100: > > > > > At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as > > > recommended in the standard. > > > > Which has status informational o

Re: Incredimail CRLF encoding

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:39:49:PM + Simon White wrote: > So, since I'm hopeless with encoding, can someone tell me if I can filter > these people's mail in the pager so I don't have to keep asking them to > plaintext? set display_filter="~/.mutt/scripts/displayfilter" ,[ displayfi

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:23:06:PM -0800 Gary Johnson wrote: > I'm in a similar > situation where I need to periodically send to a distribution list a > document written in Word and would like to send it with a text/plain > version as multipart/alternative. Nothing I have done to edit the >

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:02:17:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I > enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the > message is. As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more

Re: Saving encrypted

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Alan Batie wrote: > > Sooo, before I waste too much more time on this, I thought I'd see if > anyone else has solved this problem... > The way I got around this problem was to put "encrypt-to " in my gnupg options file. That way all messages are encrypted to me and the ot

Re: OT: canada sucks

We've been able to teach Frenchmen to play ice hockey, which is more than any European has been able to do. On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 20:13]: > > Alas! tim lupfer spake thus: > > > > Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to

mailbox question

Hi! I have a question if I can do the following with mutt. I'm subscribed to several mailing lists which are sent to 2 mail accounts. I'm using fetchmail to retrieve the mails that are then stored in /var/spool/mail/matthias. I'd like mutt to check whether a mail came from a mailing list and di

Re: Mail is not reaching destination

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:36:21 -0500 darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Jerry Van Brimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 23, 2002 16:39]: > > When I do: > > # date | sendmail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > #(ispwest.com is another isp of mine) > > > > Here's what I get: > > (lines

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network? NOOOOO!

* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 21:22]: > 25-Mar-02 at 02:00, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > seriously - mutt sends email. that's it. > > if your users don't read their emails right away > > then they won't notice your message at all. > It doesn't even do that. [..] > W

Re: line drawings showing threads gone with REMOTE session!?!?!?

* Christian Seberino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-26 00:03]: > My .muttrc is set up to sort mail by threads rather > than exclusively by date. Mutt draws nice lines > and indents "child" emails of a thread nicely. > I tried to log into this PC REMOTELY and these > nice features did NOT come out a

Re: line drawings showing threads gone with REMOTE session!?!?!?

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 04:03:29PM -0800, Christian Seberino wrote: > My .muttrc is set up to sort mail by threads rather > than exclusively by date. Mutt draws nice lines and > indents "child" emails of a thread nicely. > > I tried to log into this PC REMOTELY and these "REMOTELY" via what typ

Re: Saving encrypted

begin quoting what Alan Batie said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:03:24PM -0800: > first place. I discovered the fcc_clear option, which saves the message > unencrypted and have been living with that, but what I *really* want is to > save them encrypted to *me*. Mutt doesn't do that, but PGP does.

line drawings showing threads gone with REMOTE session!?!?!?

My .muttrc is set up to sort mail by threads rather than exclusively by date. Mutt draws nice lines and indents "child" emails of a thread nicely. I tried to log into this PC REMOTELY and these nice features did NOT come out anymore?!!? How do I get these lines again remotely??? Thanks, Chris

Re: Incredimail CRLF encoding

On 15:02 25 Mar 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Well, look into fetchmail. If you can't/won't use fetchmail, use a perl | script that searches through a file and strips out all the ^M's... ;) | | It would be a pretty simple script. Here's a snippet: | | while () | { | s/^M

Re: Saving encrypted

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 05:38:44PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > > what I *really* want is to save them encrypted to *me*. > http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg22312.html Perfect! Thanks... -- Alan Batie __www.rdrop.com/users/alan Me [E

Re: Saving encrypted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Alan Batie on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:03:24PM -0800: > what I *really* want is to save them encrypted to *me*. See the archives from the past week... I seem to remember it coming up. Also, a quick search gives this: http://www.mail-

Saving encrypted

I've been using mutt with pgp and gpg for years now, and would like to solve a nagging problem: when I started using it, I let it save my outgoing mail encrypted until I discovered that it was saving the outgoing message exactly --- encrypted to the recipient. Well *that's* pretty useless, as the

Re: Incredimail CRLF encoding

Alas! Simon White spake thus: > Well just as an aside Incredimail marketing claims "Email has evolved" on > its website, or something equally high power marketing toss to go with the > eyecandy approach to email. Yeah, as far as I can tell all those stupid X- headers are some kind of "preference

Re: Bug Report Guide - additions?

On Mar 25, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Mar 25, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > well, considering the amount of data this generates > > mutt-dev isn't the place to take in such huge mails, either. > > mutt-dev is the place where the developers want the bugs to come so

Incredimail CRLF encoding

25-Mar-02 at 12:44, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Besides, I'm only doing it to Incredimail users. I mean, if they want to > accost me with tons of useless X- headers, I shouldn't have to put up with > them (the headers, not the people) :P Well just as an aside Incredimail marke

Re: Bug Report Guide - additions?

On Mar 25, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 03:23]: > > Second, it is wrong as far as it goes. flea(1) doesn't send anything > > to debian.org. > > SUBMIT="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > DEBIAN_SUBMIT="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > hmm... isn't DEBIAN

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:34:48PM -0700: > > ignore received x-nuke > > There are other headers I want to hide though. When I said have procmail prepend all the "bad" headers, I meant "every header you'd like to hide". > The only headers that I _want_

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

--yklP1rR72f9kjNtc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: > > That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke > > without ignoring the other X- headers? (without us

Re: massage-hook vs message-hook

's from one of "those" lists ;-) just ask David - he should know. (hey, David, have you stopped posting to the XXX list?) Sven [what's wrong with them "just pick one" people lately?] -- mutt.patch.massage.gimmegimmegimme.20020325

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:05:45PM -0700: > > That brings us back to the first problem though: How do I ignore X-Nuke > without ignoring the other X- headers? (without using the huge mess > david posted). ignore received x-nuke msg26096/pgp0.pgp

Re: OT: canada sucks

* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 20:13]: > Alas! tim lupfer spake thus: > > > Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, > > > which is a decidedly female name in Canada. > > > I've never heard of a man named Jessy ;) > > but does canada _really_ count? > > nah. go play wi

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

--MFZs98Tklfu0WsCO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: > You can have it both ways; use Procmail to prepend "X-Nuke" at the > beginning of all the "bad" lines, then ignore X-Nuke. That

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

--CNfT9TXqV7nd4cfk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: > I mean, who really cares about all that other crapola? A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:25:23PM -0700: > > I'd rather just rip off all the useless headers with an elegant 3-line > procmail recipie than have to hide them all with 10 or 20 lines of > ignore statements. You can have it both ways; use Procmail to pre

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

Shawn, et al -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % If you want elegant: % % ignore * % unignore date from: reply-to to cc subject list user-agent x-mailer % % I mean, who really cares about all that other crapola? Well, yeah. If you want to go that far, ... % % Most people could go th

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:44:26PM -0700: > > Besides, I'm only doing it to Incredimail users. I mean, if they want to > accost me with tons of useless X- headers, I shouldn't have to put up with > them (the headers, not the people) :P If you want elega

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:39:39AM -0500, Donna Koenig wrote: > I need help. Is there an option in mutt (muttrc) to set the content > type to multipart/alternative? > > Situation is: > We want to send out email that is html, but for those who only > accept or access text email, we wnat them

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

begin quoting what Rob 'Feztaa' Park said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:31:36PM -0700: > > Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, which is a decidedly > female name in Canada. I've never heard of a man named Jessy ;) Jesse Owens. Jesse Ventura. Insist on the same spelling? Ok. Jessy

Re: picking on Rob (was "Re: PGP signing (newbie)")

Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % > % Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, which is a decidedly % > % female name in Canada. I've never heard of a man named Jessy ;) % > % > You've never heard of Jesse Ventura or Jesse James, just for starters? % >

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

--cPi+lWm09sJ+d57q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % Oh yuck! You don't honestly believe that that mess is a better solution > % than a 3-line procmail recepie, do you? >=20 > Sure I

Re: picking on Rob (was "Re: PGP signing (newbie)")

--NklN7DEeGtkPCoo3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, which is a decidedly > % female name in Canada. I've never heard of a man named J

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100: > > > At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as > > recommended in the standard. > > Which has status informational only. Ok, first, wrong, it's standards-track, not informational. However, it *I

Re: OT: canada sucks. [was Re: PGP signing (newbie)]

Alas! tim lupfer spake thus: > > Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, which is a > > decidedly female name in Canada. I've never heard of a man named > > Jessy ;) > > but does canada _really_ count? nah. go play with an elk :P Oh, _that_'s mature... -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROT

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

begin quoting what Donna Koenig said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:39:39AM -0500: > > Situation is: > We want to send out email that is html, but for those who only > accept or access text email, we wnat them to be able to open the email > also. OK, let me see if I get this right: You want to

Re: push in muttrc

On 25.Mar 2002, Markus Hubig wrote: > > Oh I remember that I have an alias for mutt, so if I type in mutt it > executes "mutt -y"! Mayby this is the difference ...?! > Oh, this works fine! > But why don't you create an little Script called eg. gmsm > (GetMailStartMutt ;-) that executes getmail

Re: push in muttrc -> automize vs interactive

On 25.Mar 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Martin Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 16:14]: > > The last line of my ~/.mutt/muttrc is > > push "!/home/martin/bin/getmail\n \n" > > which should start a script fetching mails > > from my ISPs but does not work. :( > > I suggest to *not* do such thi

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:18:11:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100: > > > > Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the > > context of mail clients. > Oh, it is a mail client, it's just n

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % > Rather than using procmail, which will *gasp* change the mail as it comes % > in, just have mutt ignore those headers that you don't want to see and % > update your list as you see new ones. To wit: ... % % Oh yuck! You don'

Re: picking on Rob (was "Re: PGP signing (newbie)")

Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy" to me, which is a decidedly % female name in Canada. I've never heard of a man named Jessy ;) You've never heard of Jesse Ventura or Jesse James, just for starters? Sure, they're both American, but one is quite col

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

--2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: > Rather than using procmail, which will *gasp* change the mail as it comes > in, just have mutt ignore those headers that you don't w

Re: change from header

* Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 02:55]: > another question: is it possible that if i run > mutt with -f option, the folder-hooks don't work? could be. start a new thread, ok? Sven

OT: canada sucks. [was Re: PGP signing (newbie)]

* thus spaketh Rob 'Feztaa' Park (Mar 25 at 12:31PM): >> I don't know that I can let you get away with that. Said in the >> correct accent - in fact, one of German, Switzerdutch, and most >> Scandinavian accents, Jussi sounds reasonably masculine to me. > Well, it sounds an awful lot like "Jessy

Re: Search pattern: fail to enter mbyte characters

* Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 15:03]: > Is it possible to let mutt accept muilt-byte > (eg. Traditional Chinese) charaters > while entering search pattern? > mutt strips the 8th bit. I can not > find the setting to tell it not to. I don't think that mutt has any support for multi

Re: Bug Report Guide - additions?

* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 03:23]: > > http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/bugrep.html > > Additions? Corrections? Feedback welcome! > The last sentence of the top section is: > "The report then gets sent to debian.org and there enters the" > First, this is incomplete

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

--SNIs70sCzqvszXB4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! John Buttery spake thus: > Oh, and of course I also sign just to keep Rob from forging my email. > :) Rats! Foiled again! :) --=20 Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EM

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

25-Mar-02 at 20:14, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > * Donna Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 18:38]: > > We want to send out email that is html, but for those who > > only accept or access text email, we wnat them to be able > > to open the email also. Is there an option in mutt >

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

--DiL7RhKs8rK9YGuF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Simon White spake thus: > 24-Mar-02 at 22:37, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > Your name just sounds so feminine. We seem to get a lot of t

Re: push in muttrc

Hi Martin! On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Martin Hammer wrote: > On 25.Mar 2002, Markus Hubig wrote: > > > > Hmm, I put > > > > | push "!/home/markus/bin/test.sh\n \n" > > > > in the last line of my muttrc and it works like a charm ... > > > > I'm running Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22). > > > So it is po

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

* Donna Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 18:38]: > We want to send out email that is html, but for those who > only accept or access text email, we wnat them to be able > to open the email also. Is there an option in mutt > (muttrc) to set the content type to multipart/alternative? That's

Re: push in muttrc -> automize vs interactive

* Martin Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 16:14]: > The last line of my ~/.mutt/muttrc is > push "!/home/martin/bin/getmail\n \n" > which should start a script fetching mails > from my ISPs but does not work. :( I suggest to *not* do such things at startup in mutt - you might regret it late

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

25-Mar-02 at 11:39, Donna Koenig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I need help. Is there an option in mutt (muttrc) to set the content > type to multipart/alternative? > > Situation is: > We want to send out email that is html, but for those who only > accept or access text email, we wnat them t

setting content type in email header with mutt

I need help. Is there an option in mutt (muttrc) to set the content type to multipart/alternative? Situation is: We want to send out email that is html, but for those who only accept or access text email, we wnat them to be able to open the email also. Any help would be appreciated. Donna

Re: push in muttrc

On 25.Mar 2002, Markus Hubig wrote: > > Hmm, I put > > | push "!/home/markus/bin/test.sh\n \n" > > in the last line of my muttrc and it works like a charm ... > > I'm running Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22). > So it is possible that it works on my machine too.. :-) I've found out that push works

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100: > > Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the > context of mail clients. Oh, it is a mail client, it's just not an Internet mail client. At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compli

Re: push in muttrc

Hi Martin! On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Martin Hammer wrote: > The last line of my ~/.mutt/muttrc is > > push "!/home/martin/bin/getmail\n \n" > > which should start a script fetching mails from my ISPs but > does not work. :( In Mutt itself push works fine: Hmm, I put | push "!/home/markus/bin/te

Re: push in muttrc

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 17:13:48 +0100, Martin Hammer wrote: > So is there a way to enable push in muttrc? I have push V in my .muttrc and it works. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat Int

push in muttrc

Hi all! The last line of my ~/.mutt/muttrc is push "!/home/martin/bin/getmail\n \n" which should start a script fetching mails from my ISPs but does not work. :( In Mutt itself push works fine: :push "!/home/martin/bin/getmail\n \n" is OK. So is there a way to enable push in muttrc? (obviou

Re: startup commands

On Mar 24, Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any way of telling mutt to execute an interactive command > (e.g. collapse-all) in .muttrc short of using push? Sure. There is exec, which is used with named commands, not in key-stroke macros. For example: folder-hook !"!"

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

Shawn, et al -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % ... % from me in lots of fora, all signed, then you may consider my identity % established enough for your purposes, and choose to local-sign my key, and ... % If you do that, make sure you local-sign, not sign for export. The latter % would b

Re: message-hooks - more examples

Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus: % > Sven [mmh.. ye... deeper.. oh, yeah..] % % You sure that's a massage you're getting? ;) No, it's a m-e-ssage, but it's from one of "those" lists ;-) :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

Rob, et al -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: % > % > Or list all of the obnoxious ones, and then set up procmail to strip % > them out; that will work as a general solution in case somebody else % > uses Incredimail. % % Hey, that's a good idea. But how do I stri

Re: Encrypting my outgoing messages to myself for fcc

Hi Robert! On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Robert Conde wrote: > When I send a pgp encrypted message to someone, I can't read it in my > fcc folder. I set the fcc_clear variable so that the FCC is stored > unencrypted. I read in some FAQ that it's possible to "configure Mutt > to use GnuPG's '--enc

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

Hi Rob! On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Care to give some examples? folder-hook =folder 'push T~r>1m\n' if [ ~T ]; then 'push \;s=archiv\n' fi -- [ markus hubig ] [ mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ debian/gnu linux (sid) ] [ vorholzstrasse 6 ] [ saft: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [

Re: Mail is not reaching destination

Quoting Jerry Van Brimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 23, 2002 16:39]: > When I do: > # date | sendmail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > #(ispwest.com is another isp of mine) > > Here's what I get: (lines removed) Possibly two things wrong: 1. Is sendmail set up to allow messages to go to/from root?

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:09:41:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > > Care to give some examples? > > if [ muttversion != "1.5.0" ]; then > source ~/.mutt/setup/nntp > fi Quoting the fine manual section 3.0: In addition, mutt supports v

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alas! Jussi Ekholm spake thus: >> And to point out -- 'sed s/her/his/g'. ;-) > > You're a guy? Oooops! Sorry. > Your name just sounds so feminine. Hehe, no problem. :-) And I could take the lower line as a compliment, I guess. But yeah, this is

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:16:52:AM -0600 David DeSimone wrote: > J. Effendi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can I use mutt to replace this kind of notification messages to all > > users easily? Where can I get more information about it? > Others have answered your first question, but I

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:50:29:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 01:40]: > > At least connditionals are absolutely missing > > in mutt's config file functionality. > .. and also missing with setup files > for elm, pine, outlook, ... "All mail clie

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?

Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:09:40:PM -0500 Andre Berger wrote: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: > > well, does this BCC header get posted, too? > > if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug* > Indirectly: > To: undisclosed recipients ; > is generated, but no mail is

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:09:41:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > Care to give some examples? if [ muttversion != "1.5.0" ]; then source ~/.mutt/setup/nntp fi But you're right, this one may be done with a bash script. But - to me - it looks ugly havin a good mail client and some sort

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

* Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-24 21:09:42 +0200]: >Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Alas! Jussi Ekholm spake thus: >>> But yeah - what is so bad in PGP signed mails in mailing lists? >> >> There is nothing wrong -- the people who say it is wrong are simply >> hereti

[OT] Names (Was: Re: PGP signing (newbie))

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:10:11AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In and English accent (particularly Canadian/American) it /may/ sound > feminine... but you should never assume that just because in your phonetics, a > name sounds feminine, that it is. Indeed, never assume at all that you can >

OT:on feminine and masculine names

Let's mark this thread properly so at least it's easy to filter out... Said this, my two drops of gasoline on the fire: Jussi =~ Giusi, same pronounce here in Italy, where is short for Giuseppina (feminine only), but, OTOH Andrea = masculine only in Italy, feminine in Germany

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network?

25-Mar-02 at 02:00, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > seriously - mutt sends email. that's it. > if your users don't read their emails right away > then they won't notice your message at all. It doesn't even do that. Mutt reads mail (but it's better to use a helper app to get it) and the

Re: PGP signing (newbie)

24-Mar-02 at 22:37, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Your name just sounds so feminine. We seem to get a lot of that here, > don't we? ;) I don't know that I can let you get away with that. Said in the correct accent - in fact, one of German, Switzerdutch, and most Scandinavian acc