On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:03:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I'll accept that. I'd call it the GUI version of mutt :-) While I see
> that as a logical evolution, I don't see it happening; mutt runs happily
> in a GUI (as you point out) terminal and can be made to call GUI helper
> applications (
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:08:30PM -0300, Robson Braga Araujo (dis)graced my inbox
with:
> > If you are testing $reply_regexp: It's case *insensitive*. So just
> > write "re" instead of "[Rr][Ee]". Maybe this helps you to find the
> > error.
>
> I know, I wrote it in perl to test and then cut
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
> >I certainly agree. The customizeability you can get with mutt and a few
> >good scripts cannot possibly be beaten by some checkboxes in a GUI ;)
> You should try NEdit. Full GUI, full keyboard support, macro lan
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:32:06AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
> >It works. I refer to DOS as Unix's retarded brother. Since I use NT
> >as my desktop (and more and more Mac OS X) at work, I use the DOS
> >shell a lot.
> You have a high pain threshold. Why not use bash?
I'
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:32AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
> Hi,
>
> * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-07 23:43]:
> >On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
> >> >>> Speaking of why kmail is bad... does anybody know
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:50:00PM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
> Robson Braga Araujo wrote:
> >
> > I would like to know why a regular expression like
> > '^(\[[^]]+\] *[Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *)|([Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *\[[^]]+\]
>*)(([Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *)?(\[[^]]+\] *)?)*'
> > does not work
Hello all,
I know this is not exactly a mutt question, but since the app name have
m-word in it i decided to ask here...
How can i configure muttprint or whatever it's using (LaTeX ?) to print
cyrillic ?
igor
--
Uptime : 67 days, 18:03
Robson Braga Araujo wrote:
>
> I would like to know why a regular expression like
> '^(\[[^]]+\] *[Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *)|([Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *\[[^]]+\]
>*)(([Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *)?(\[[^]]+\] *)?)*'
> does not work in mutt.
If you are testing $reply_regexp: It's case *insensitive*. S
Hi,
I would like to know why a regular expression like
'^(\[[^]]+\] *[Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *)|([Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *\[[^]]+\]
*)(([Rr][Ee](\[[0-9]+\])?: *)?(\[[^]]+\] *)?)*'
does not work in mutt. I tested it using perl and it worked perfectly
matching the list and the Re: part of the subje
Moin,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-07 23:47]:
>On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:55:42PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
>> No; you name advantages of GUI apps, which I am aware of (I'm writing
>> this with NEdit). What I called GUI-damaged user are however *not*
>> aw
Matthew D. Fuller [08/11/01 06:46 -0600]:
> I'd guess the mail directory was 1777 before.
> I've had this happen on my systems (FreeBSD) where, during the
> 'installworld' process (which installs a fresh system from binaries just
> built from source, a common means of upgrading) the system runs a
11 matches
Mail list logo
