Am Mon, 03 Sep 2001, schrieb Andre Bonhote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote:
> > Two Words: outlook! :-(
>
> You missed one word: sucks!
>
> > Use Inline Signatures:
> > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
>
> Does not work.
>
> > Note that PGP/MIME w
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 21:37 -0700]:
>
>So sprach »Denis Perelyubskiy« am 2001-09-03 um 16:16:50
>-0700 :
>> the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do
>> a g followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty
>> ugly.
>
>How about mapping
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 21:40 -0700]:
>
>So sprach »Denis Perelyubskiy« am 2001-09-03 um 16:16:50
>-0700 :
>> the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do
>> a g followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty
>> ugly.
>
>How about mapping
So sprach »Denis Perelyubskiy« am 2001-09-03 um 16:16:50 -0700 :
> the only way i see is to map to a macro, which would do a g
> followed by 20 or so backspaces. that sounds pretty ugly.
How about mapping CTRL-k -> \Ck to g? This would erase everything to
the beginning of the line.
Alexander Sk
hello,
is there an easy way to map something in browser (some macro
maybe) that would present me with
New file name:
when i do 'select-new' (presently i have it mapped to g)
right now, when i hit g (thus triggering 'select-new'), i am
presented with the following:
New file name: /home/den
* Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Mon-01 14:46 -0700]:
>
>* Erika Pacholleck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010901 04:46]:
>> [23.08.01 18:45 +0100] Ailbhe Leamy <-- :
>> > On (18/08/01 18:57), David R?hr wrote:
[...snip...]
>> done. Set in mutt indent string to ">" and then change the vi
* Erika Pacholleck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010901 04:46]:
> [23.08.01 18:45 +0100] Ailbhe Leamy <-- :
> > On (18/08/01 18:57), David R?hr wrote:
> > > When I answer a mail mutt always put "> " as quote on the last mail
> > > according to the indent_string in my .muttrc.
> > >
> > > I want "> " only w
My problem is the following. I use mutt from a perl script to send different
type of docs as an attachment automaticaly. It is working correctly but the
Content-Disposition is inline and Outlook Express doesn't feel it to be attachment at
all.
On the other hand in interactive mode i can send emai
The attached patch should fix this.
Thanks for reporting.
On 2001-09-02 18:45:39 -0400, David T-G wrote:
>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:45:39 -0400
>From: David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Mutt Users' List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: why "no visible messages"?
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
>
>Hi, al
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote:
> Two Words: outlook! :-(
You missed one word: sucks!
> Use Inline Signatures:
> set pgp_create_traditional=yes
Does not work.
> Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have
> a character set d
On 2001-08-31 12:10:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I use mutt both at home and at work on the same mailbox.
>Yesterday it mysteriously purged the last 15 days worth of email.
>I intended to quit and restart it, but it said 'writing
>mailbox...', and then reopened it with 15 days worth of
Andre Bonhote wrote:
>
> I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work
> with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook
> Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, after exchanging keys
> (which are different, for testing purpose), I first tried to
Hi fellows
Sorry about asking that (again?), but I didn't find a solution to this
problem searching the web.
I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work
with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook
Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, aft
On 2001.09.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to apply all that comprise lists in the `lists' or
> `subscribe' command to regex such as this
>
> send-hook "~C mutt-users" 'set signature="echo Eric Smith|"'
>
> So instead of explicitly spe
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:56:19PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Thus spake Arvid Warnecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Hm, sorry I don't think that I uderstood that :-( You want to encrypt
> > _and_ not encrypt the same mail when you send it to two people where
> > you have only a key for one o
15 matches
Mail list logo
