At Fri, Jun 29 2001 [09:31 -0400], Dan Boger aroused my curiosity with:
> >from the mutt manual:
>
> 3.20. Message Scoring
>
> ...
>
> Negative final scores are rounded up to 0.
Oops, I haven't read this sentence - sorry.
Does that mean, that I have to add a "default score" to all r
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:11:52AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> I am trying to find a way to view M$Word and Excel docs as attachments
> in Mutt. I have to either get this working, or go back to an OS I'd
> rather not really use. For some reason, mswordview is not working
> anymore with my mut
Try antiword to read MS-Word from this URL
http://www.winfield.demon.nl/
-Muthu
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:11:52AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I know this has been discussed before, but I can't seem to find it
> now.
>
> I am trying to find a way to view M$Word and Exce
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
> I have two problems with scores in mutt. Whenever the score of a message
> is negative, %N in the "index_format" shows zero and the settings in
> "score_threshold_delete" and "score_threshold_read" will never match.
from the mutt man
Hello,
I have two problems with scores in mutt. Whenever the score of a message
is negative, %N in the "index_format" shows zero and the settings in
"score_threshold_delete" and "score_threshold_read" will never match.
Example 1:
score '~s foo' 10
score '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' -100
If the messa
Hello,
I have a question about saving text/plain attachments.
When I receive a text attachment from a Windows user and save the
attachment to my disk, the textfile will be converted from DOS-
to UNIX-format.
Most of the time, I forget to recode the files, because I need them on
a Windows box.
I
Hello,
I just wanted to thank people who answered to my question
of some days ago, reported in the subject of this email.
I must say that the problem I reported never happened again,
which means that maybe I was just a bit too sleepy :-()
There is one thing I would like to point out however. Th
On 2001-06-29 11:28:05 +0100, Jason Williams wrote:
>So what does turning it off break? Presumably there's a tradeoff
>somewhere?
The tradeoff is that the option also affects BCCs, if I recall this
correctly and read it correctly in the code.
Of course, this could be fixed... (It wouldn't even
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:12:28PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-06-29 03:52:05 +0100, Jason Williams wrote:
>
> >I'm just curious, is there a reason why this default isn't listed
> >as a bug and fixed?
>
> Because it's traditional behaviour which works nicely with
> everything I kno
On 2001-06-29 03:52:05 +0100, Jason Williams wrote:
>I'm just curious, is there a reason why this default isn't listed
>as a bug and fixed?
Because it's traditional behaviour which works nicely with
everything I know about, with the exception of exim.
--
Thomas Roessler
10 matches
Mail list logo
