> Hi, I've been wanting to ask, why would "Nelson D. Guerrero" turn to
> "Nelson D . Guerrero" on my mutt? I set it up in the .muttrc file to be
> "Nelson D. Guerrero" and every time I try to email someone it would just
> go back to "D ."
This one bothered the heck out of me for a while. Try:
There's something I'd like to do within mutt, but it's complex and I'm
not sure if mutt can handle it. I'm currently using gnus to
accomplish this complex task, and although it works, I'd like to
switch to mutt if at all possible.
In order to explain what I want to do, I have to first give some
Jeffrey A Schoolcraft proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> sorry, forgot the !
> mailboxes ! `for file in ~/mail/*; do echo -n "+$(basename $file) "; done`
instead - try
mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/*`
it works just fine :)
--suresh
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus I
Hi, I've been wanting to ask, why would "Nelson D. Guerrero" turn to
"Nelson D . Guerrero" on my mutt? I set it up in the .muttrc file to be
"Nelson D. Guerrero" and every time I try to email someone it would just
go back to "D ."
---
Nelson D. Guerrero| E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:53:12PM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:
>you forgot the '=' before the last few, if you quoted your mailboxes line
>correctly.
Aah... finally, find the beast that causing the malfunction.
I don't even know why on earth cause me to forget those = before mailbox
name. Thanks
sorry, forgot the !
mailboxes ! `for file in ~/mail/*; do echo -n "+$(basename $file) "; done`
Jeffrey A Schoolcraft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> you might want to do something like this then:
>
> mailboxes `for file in ~/mail/*; do echo -n "+$(basename $file) "; done`
>
> works for me.
>
>
you might want to do something like this then:
mailboxes `for file in ~/mail/*; do echo -n "+$(basename $file) "; done`
works for me.
Jeff
On Wednesday, 17 January 2001 at 08:49, John Indra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:30:34AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> >Could it be pure coincidence that it's only the first seven that are full
> >paths (well, shortcuts to full paths) while the rest aren't? :-)
>
> I don't quite get your
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:30:34AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
>Could it be pure coincidence that it's only the first seven that are full
>paths (well, shortcuts to full paths) while the rest aren't? :-)
I don't quite get your point.
All those mailboxes reside in $HOME/mail. None of them are sym
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:19:37AM +0700, John Indra wrote:
> Dear all...
>
> I have this entry in my .muttrc:
> mailboxes ! =dsniff ="@freebsd.org" ="@mutt.org" ="pau-mikro" \
> ="@postfix.org" ="@redhat.com" "@securityfocus.com" "libwww" "vpopmail"
>
> Unfortunately not all mailboxes notify me
Dear all...
I have this entry in my .muttrc:
mailboxes ! =dsniff ="@freebsd.org" ="@mutt.org" ="pau-mikro" \
="@postfix.org" ="@redhat.com" "@securityfocus.com" "libwww" "vpopmail"
Unfortunately not all mailboxes notify me when new mail arrives. Only the
first 7!?!
Is there some limitation of th
Hello,
Anybody got the Subject working? I've been very happily using
Mutt/IMAP/Kerberos 5 w/o passwords on my Linux box at work (RedHat 6.2) -
thanks Brendan. I tried the same on my home box with Debian 2.2 and I ran
into trouble. First, I did not see any Kerberos 5 in Debian, so I compiled
from
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 06:57:07AM -0800, Mike E wrote:
> On a related note. How do you guys get new keys anyhow? I have
> encryption/decryption working, but is there a way to have gpg/mutt
> automatically fetch public keys from keyservers for you?
If you set a keyserver in the .gnupg/options fil
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Kai Weber wrote:
> > This is just an example. My question therefor is whether a solution for
> > keeping the keyring up-to-date already exist?
>
> You need to roll your own. Attached, you'll find my script. Fell free
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:19:13PM +0100, Kai Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe it is not a question for Mutt but because I mostly use gpg with
> Mutt it fits the on-topic-rules.
>
> How can I automatically clean up my pubring? Let's say, a key has
> expired. Mutt/Gpg uses still the key in the pubrin
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Kai Weber wrote:
> This is just an example. My question therefor is whether a solution for
> keeping the keyring up-to-date already exist?
You need to roll your own. Attached, you'll find my script. Fell free to use
and modify it, but be aware of possible pitfalls. It Works F
Hi,
maybe it is not a question for Mutt but because I mostly use gpg with
Mutt it fits the on-topic-rules.
How can I automatically clean up my pubring? Let's say, a key has
expired. Mutt/Gpg uses still the key in the pubring. I have to go and
remove the key to fetch a new one.
This is just an e
17 matches
Mail list logo
