Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > This is because Mutt doesn't update the folder modification/access times > according to whether the folder still has new mail in it (or not). > > For mbox folders, the N appears in the folder listing if (and only if) > the modifica

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Greg Whitlock
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: # # This issue has come up before, and I have some vague memories about a # patch that would set the file access time to 1 second before the file # modification time when an mbox folder was exited, if it contained new # mails. But I

Folder specific index_format

2000-11-13 Thread iain truskett
Hello, I'm attempting to use the following (which seem logical enough for me) to perform folder specific index formatting: folder-hook . \ 'set index_format="%4C %4N %Z %[!%y%m%d-%H%M] %-17.17F (%5l) %s"' folder-hook in-l-bugtraq \ 'set index_format="%4C %4N %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-14.

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > So should this work: > > mailboxes ~/Maildir > mailboxes =DevInfo Yes, that shoudl work. > To further clarify, I should ask... Does mutt actually tell you when > you have mail in other mailboxes? Or only the Maildir? In

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marco Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Nov 2000: > whenever i get new mail this N mark is correctly set by mutt. the > interesting thing is, when i read my mail in the mailbox and i mark > it "new" by hand again (after reading it) the mail gets the N flag fine. > but after changing the

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Marco Ahrendt
hi all, when discussing the new mail mark problem i have a question too. whenever i get new mail this N mark is correctly set by mutt. the interesting thing is, when i read my mail in the mailbox and i mark it "new" by hand again (after reading it) the mail gets the N flag fine. but after changin

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:22:16AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > > or does mutt just not tell you when you have new mail in other > > folders, except for ~/Maildir? > > That's the default. If you have other incoming mail folders, you

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > or does mutt just not tell you when you have new mail in other > folders, except for ~/Maildir? That's the default. If you have other incoming mail folders, you need to tell Mutt about them. This is done with the "mailboxes" command.

procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Adrian Chung
Hi! I'm using mutt and procmail. It's an older version of procmail that didn't natively support maildirs, and so at the time I'd found a program called safecat, that came with a binary that could be used with procmail to move mail safely into a Maildir. I've noticed that I filter mail successfu

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:28:12PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: > What's the proper way to keep the default behavior, but still use the > additional handy features you get when using the subscribe command. you want to change your default $index_format to use %F instead of %Z, most likely. me

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Josh Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > What's the proper way to keep the default behavior, but still use the > additional handy features you get when using the subscribe command. Change your $index_format. Changing the %L into a %F in the format string will likely make you h

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:53:52AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:28:12PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: > > What's the proper way to keep the default behavior, but still use the > > additional handy features you get when using the subscribe command. > > you want to change yo

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > FYI using that will break your outbox (if you use one) showing who the > outbound mail is to. So I'd use it like this: > > folder-hook . 'set index_format = "%4C %Z %[%b %d] %-15.15n (%4l) %s"' > # Set the outbox index different, I want

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Ben Reser
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: > > set index_format = "%4C %Z %[%b %d] %-15.15n (%4l) %s" > > > > > > The default format string has "%-15.15L" instead of "%-15.15n". The > > "n" expands to the author's real name (o

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Josh Huber
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:49:33AM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote: > set index_format = "%4C %Z %[%b %d] %-15.15n (%4l) %s" > > > The default format string has "%-15.15L" instead of "%-15.15n". The > "n" expands to the author's real name (or ad

Re: mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Luke Ravitch
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:28:12PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote: > I like mutt's ability to set the Mail-Followup-To variable, and the > list-reply functionality, but I don't like how it shows the list name > instead of the person who sent the mail in the index view. > > I already have procmail sort m

mailing list handling

2000-11-13 Thread Josh Huber
Hi again. I like mutt's ability to set the Mail-Followup-To variable, and the list-reply functionality, but I don't like how it shows the list name instead of the person who sent the mail in the index view. I already have procmail sort mail into seperate mailboxes, so I know what mailing list I'

Re: N in folder list

2000-11-13 Thread lang
On Thu, 09 Nov 2000, Mike E wrote: > Keeping my .muttrc up to date is starting to be a hassle. I guess > that's what I get for being on dozens of mailing lists. :) No, the reason to be on dozens of mailing lists is to give you work to do on your .muttrc to keep it up to date. :-) -- Greg Mathe

character sets

2000-11-13 Thread JT Williams
I'm trying to figure out how to display diacritical marks in my received emails. I've tried setting LC_CTYPE as suggested in the FAQ; that leads to the error message `couldn't set locale correctly'. I've read about `charset' and `charset-hook' in the manual, but what do I actually *do* in my .mu

Re: japanese with devel mutt

2000-11-13 Thread Josh Huber
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 04:36:37PM +0800, Anthony Liu wrote: > OK here is my take: > > There are two xterms you can choose to display Japanese character set. > However I have only tried the more popular shift-jis encoding, which the > other one is deprecated, I think. > > One is Kanjiterm, Kterm