Morten --
...and then Morten Liebach said...
%
% I'd better go find some GnuPG list somewhere.
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] for starters. Good luck!
%
% Thanks!
HTH & HAND
%
% Morten
%
% --
% UNIX, reach out and grep someone!
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to f
I find it particularly troubling that you can't search for a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Unix, however you can in PGP for Windows. Command
line is much better in any case, and in most cases, much more powerful.
I wonder why this hasn't been implemented, just yet.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 01:31:57PM -0700
On 22, aug, 2000 at 12:26:01 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:52:18AM +0200, Morten Liebach wrote:
> > On 21, aug, 2000 at 10:31:44 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> >
> > > What happens if you run the GPG query by hand? For example:
> > >
> > > ,
> > > | gpg --list-keys --w
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 03:10:40PM +0300, Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote:
>
> 1. For printing messages I am using "pr -o 4 -W 72 | lpr". The problem is
> that it does not wrap the long lines, but trancate them, which is not a
> good thing. Maybe someone figured out the way to print nicely long lines.
Submitted 22 Aug, 2000 by David T-G:
> might be considered. I dunno if "all keyservers" talk to each other or
> if there are multiple key databases that are shared amongst a subset of
> servers, either.
I would tend to suspect the latter. As far as I can tell, there are at
least two distinct t
> I've been to Baal's MIT keyserver in the past, but it seems to be down
> now;
Bal's server had a scheduled downtime last weekend. Should have been
back since Monday morning at the latest.
Jason, et al --
...and then Jason Helfman said...
% What are some opinions of some good keyservers out there?
I have wwwkeys.us.pgp.net in my GPG options file, and it usually works.
I've been to Baal's MIT keyserver in the past, but it seems to be down
now; I also tried certserver.pgp.com with t
What are some opinions of some good keyservers out there?
--
/Jason G Helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get
I received a message that mutt refuses to reply/group-reply to
(prossibly due to improper From/Reply-To headers?). In both cases, it
inserts my address in the To field. The offending message's headers
follow:
>Received: from mailandnews.com [199.29.68.160]
>by localhost with POP3 (fetch
Jason --
...and then Jason Helfman said...
% Why would you save to the current folder, why not like a "sent"
% folder...?
Bzzt! That wasn't the question :-)
Actually, I can think of at least one example... All of my usual mail
gets sorted into incoming folders and saved off by recipient name
Why would you save to the current folder, why not like a "sent"
folder...?
set record=+sent
this saves all my mail sent to a sent mailbox
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:33:18PM +0530, Raju K V muttered:
| hi,
|
| How do I write an fcc-hook to save the outgoing mail in the current
| mail folder?
Raju --
...and then Raju K V said...
% hi,
%
% How do I write an fcc-hook to save the outgoing mail in the current
% mail folder?
The easiest way would be to get Byrial Jensen's current-shortcut patch (I
have a copy at
http://mutt.sector13.org/mutt-build-cocktail
if you need it; you'll have
Ben --
...and then Ben Roberts said...
% I am trying to install mutt 1.2.5 unprivileged (this server has mutt 1.0pre3us
Well, 1.0pre3 is good to have.
% on it, and doesn't support some features I'd like) but I cannot get around the
% mutt_dotlock problems. I can't find anything that tells me
Okay, looks like this is a bug in the autoconf configuration. I got it
to build by commenting out lots of dotlock stuff in the Makefile and
manually commenting out the USE_DOTLOCK definition in config.h;
configure didn't prevent this, it only is able to force the enabling of
dotlock even though i
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 03:10:40PM +0300, Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote:
> 1. For printing messages I am using "pr -o 4 -W 72 | lpr". The problem is
> that it does not wrap the long lines, but trancate them, which is not a
> good thing. Maybe someone figured out the way to print nicely long lines.
>
hi,
How do I write an fcc-hook to save the outgoing mail in the current
mail folder?
Thanks in advance,
Raju
I am trying to install mutt 1.2.5 unprivileged (this server has mutt 1.0pre3us
on it, and doesn't support some features I'd like) but I cannot get around the
mutt_dotlock problems. I can't find anything that tells me what this does, why
it has to be from group mail, and how I can work around usin
Kai Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> + Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm using a combination of procmail and a couple shell scripts for mail
> > sorting and archiving. Procmail sorts things into monthly directories such
> > as ~/mail/2000/08 with various mail folders (Maildir-style) i
On 22-Aug-2000, Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote:
> 1. For printing messages I am using "pr -o 4 -W 72 | lpr". The problem is
> that it does not wrap the long lines, but trancate them, which is not a
> good thing. Maybe someone figured out the way to print nicely long lines.
> (Yeah, I guess, this quest
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 03:10:40PM +0300, Leonid Mamtchenkov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am using mutt and really enjoying it ;-) there are though couple of
> things I cannot figure out yet (sort of).
>
> 1. For printing messages I am using "pr -o 4 -W 72 | lpr". The proble
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:36:53AM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> I'm trying to "select" messages in my "sent" folder - I'm trying to
> follow instructions in the manual for regular expressions. Here's
> what I'm trying to use:
>
> ~d [MIN]-[MAX] messages with ``date-sent'' in a Date range
>
>
Hardy --
...and then Hardy Merrill said...
% follow instructions in the manual for regular expressions. Here's
%
% ~d [MIN]-[MAX] messages with ``date-sent'' in a Date range
% *) The forms <[MAX], >[MIN], [MIN]- and -[MAX] are allowed, too.
%
...
%
% ~d <[5 Jul 2000]
%
% but that doesn't
* Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000822 14:42]:
> so since I want to tag everything with a "sent" date less than
> Jul 7, I entered "shift-T", and it asks me to enter the pattern
> to tag, so I enter
>
> ~d <[5 Jul 2000]
>
> but that doesn't work. What format does the date that I enter
>
Leonid --
...and then Leonid Mamtchenkov said...
% Hello All,
%
% I am using mutt and really enjoying it ;-) there are though couple of
Yay!
% things I cannot figure out yet (sort of).
Bummer :-)
%
% 1. For printing messages I am using "pr -o 4 -W 72 | lpr". The problem is
Dunno abou
I'm trying to "select" messages in my "sent" folder - I'm trying to
follow instructions in the manual for regular expressions. Here's
what I'm trying to use:
~d [MIN]-[MAX] messages with ``date-sent'' in a Date range
and below that it ways
*) The forms <[MAX], >[MIN], [MIN]- and -[MAX] are al
Hello All,
I am using mutt and really enjoying it ;-) there are though couple of
things I cannot figure out yet (sort of).
1. For printing messages I am using "pr -o 4 -W 72 | lpr". The problem is
that it does not wrap the long lines, but trancate them, which is not a
good thing. Maybe some
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:52:18AM +0200, Morten Liebach wrote:
> On 21, aug, 2000 at 10:31:44 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> > What happens if you run the GPG query by hand? For example:
> >
> > ,
> > | gpg --list-keys --with-colons
> > `
> >
> > do you get output?
>
> Lots, all my key
Sitting at the campfire, Kai Blin told:
> Hi folks.
>
> when I send mails using mutts "batch" mode, is there a way to split the
> lines so they fit to screen?
> I tried a script to enter a \n but that simply made a foo\nbat instead of
> foo
> bar
Problem resolved. It was an echo -e "foo\nbar" so
Hi folks.
when I send mails using mutts "batch" mode, is there a way to split the
lines so they fit to screen?
I tried a script to enter a \n but that simply made a foo\nbat instead of
foo
bar
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Kai
--
x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
On 21, aug, 2000 at 10:31:44 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Morten Liebach wrote:
>
> > I just upgraded lbdb from 0.15.1 (debian package) to 0.19.9 (self
> > compiled), and when I tested it I got: _
> >
> > morten@pc89225:~$ lbdbq
> > /usr/local/bi
On 2000-08-21 13:21:25 -0700, rex wrote:
>> However I understand that version 2.9beta23 which I tried first
>> does not support the "-T" flag. I then tried version 2.0 and
>> this also appears to not support the "-T" flag. So, what
>> versions of mixmaster does mutt support?
> Good question. Unf
31 matches
Mail list logo
