Dear mutters,
my alias file contains dozens of double lines like this:
alias echo John User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fcc-save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +'John User'
because there is no default way to prevent mutt from putting a "To " in
front of fcc folder names.
fcc-save-hook . %F
will fcc to 'To Joh
Hi, folks --
I see the paragraph under section 3 regarding version-specific muttrc
files, and I see that I can get specific versions (0.95.7i, 1.2.4i, etc)
to work but I'd like to do more generic stuff. Can I specify muttrc
files as something like
muttrc-0.x
muttrc-1.0x
muttrc-1.2x
so th
So I'm getting those corrupt files again. Here's an example...
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:46:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PLS Console unxdev.22204612
@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
The screen is then full of these ^@ characters.
??
Mike
Gregor --
...and then Gregor Zattler said...
%
% * Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > (If I used fcc-hooks, I'd
% > want to have four copies of the message saved in folders for all four
% > recipients).
%
% Me too. Does anybody have a hint how to do this?
This has come up before, a
Dear mutt users,
* Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> quote_chars in
> those programs may contain initials of person who wrote the letter i
> am replying. For example when you answer this letter it should be
> quoted with "LS>". But when something is alredy quoted only '>' is
> added a
Dear mutt-users,
* Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (If I used fcc-hooks, I'd
> want to have four copies of the message saved in folders for all four
> recipients).
Me too. Does anybody have a hint how to do this?
Ciao, Gregor
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 09:58:16AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mh... Did you check whether or not this only occurs when
> you start up mutt, or also when you change folders?
Also when I change folders.
Cheers,
-Ives
__
Ives
On 2000-07-12 09:44:31 +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
> Mmm... more than 4 seconds to read a 178K mailbox
> mounted over a fast NFS (using fiber) seems _very_ slow
> to me. If I create a new file (so it can't be cached on
> my machine) on our mailhost with the same size and copy
> it over to my machine
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:00:41PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The reason for the speed decrease you are observing is
> that earlier mutt versions' fcntl locking didn't really
> work. Working fcntl locking, however, will invalidate the
> NFS client's cache, which in turn reduces performance t
