Threads are usually broken because someone's mailer doeesn't generate
any useful trackable header like Message-ID, References, or In-Reply-To.
I would rather get the person to use a better client, or smack her/his
ISP to add this support to their mail system.
As for threading by subject, it'd be
Andrew --
I don't have an easy answer for your question, though procmail springs to
mind for starters. You mentioned searching the manual; did you find
$reply_regexp and see what you can do with it? It's pretty fancy...
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's
Hello,
When I thread mailing list messages, often the thread will be broken
up because of differing versions and placement of ``Re:'' in the
subject line, compounded by different mail clients' handling of
the subject line. For example, if the original message's Subject:
line is ``[BOB] What's
Vincent Danen muttered:
> Just because I was bored today I switched to mutt (don't ask why, I'm
> not sure myself) and so far I'm somewhat impressed.
You will find better reasons once to get used to mutt, I'm sure :-)
> I search the archive and couldn't find a satisfactory answer to this
> ques
Martynas Kriauciunas muttered:
> he asked me to tell some things what mutt can do that other mail
> programs can't (Pine or Mailx). Now I'm asking You.
The _real_ answere to your question is: 'Cause it sucks less ;-)
Michael
--
What this country needs is a good five cent microcomputer.
PGP-fin
Vincent Danen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>macro index \ea 'set signature=~/.signature-admin; \
> my_hdr From: Freezer Burn Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
>
>send-hook =freezerburn 'set signature=~/.signature-admin; \
> my_hdr From: Freezer Burn Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
set reverse_name
set
Hi there, I'm new to mutt being a long-time Pine fanatic. Just
because I was bored today I switched to mutt (don't ask why, I'm not
sure myself) and so far I'm somewhat impressed.
I search the archive and couldn't find a satisfactory answer to this
question... I used the Pine roles somewhat exc
