On 2000.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A look at the source code suggests that this is a misread, though, and
> that "^" goes before any pattern component. Well, this pattern:
> ^~L alice | ^~L bob | ^~L carol
> doesn't match anything at
> Manuel Arriaga:
> allows me to reach any message (del/undel). But in my computer j and k
> jump messages marked for deletion.
he specifically told you to use capital letters, which work.
--
clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 03:21:13AM +0100, Manuel Arriaga wrote:
> Hi, Neelakanth and Mikko,
>
> Thank you both for the tips, but only Neelakanth's works with my:
> pressing a numeric key brings up the "jump to message:" minibuffer and
> allows me to reach any message (del/undel). But in my comput
Corey --
...and then Corey G. said...
% On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:36:06AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
% > > >> By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
...
% > > >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is
...
% > You're exactly right though.
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 09:14:17PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> I didn't do that, it was the original poster, that already did it.
> If he for God's sake can't live with the wrong threading, editing the
> header seems to be the easiest workaround. If you find this cool, buy a
> coat. You'll be w
Sometime ago, Manuel Arriaga said:
> Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know whether there is
>anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits" in the middle of 10 other
>deleted messages, without having to undelete the first four - does this make any kind
>of se
Manuel Arriaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 25 May 2000:
> But in my computer j and k
> jump messages marked for deletion.
Yes, they do on my computer too.
Use capital J and K (shift+j, shift+k) instead.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 24 May 2000:
> I briefly tried using parens in a regexp way -- e.g.,
> ~L (alice|bob|carol)
> but that doesn't seem to work at all.
I didn't look into this deeply, but just to throw an idea out --
did you try something like:
^~L (alice|bob
On 2000.05.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attached a mailbox that contains 8
> messages: 6 that I want matched, 1 that is from Carol to Alice, Bob,
> and Dave, and 1 that does not include Bob. (The last two should not be
> matched.)
Oops. *No
Hi, Neelakanth and Mikko,
Thank you both for the tips, but only Neelakanth's works with my: pressing a numeric
key brings up the "jump to message:" minibuffer and allows me to reach any message
(del/undel). But in my computer j and k jump messages marked for deletion.
Bye and thanks,
Manuel
Alice, Bob, and Carol want to find all email that was sent from any one
of them to BOTH of the others, but that was not sent to ANY fourth
person.
I can make mutt match all messages that include Alice, Bob, and Carol:
~L alice ~L bob ~L carol
My mailbox has a message from Carol to Alice,
* Manuel Arriaga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000524 09:57]:
> Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know
> whether there is anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits"
> in the middle of 10 other deleted messages, without having to undelete
> the first four - does this m
Manuel Arriaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 25 May 2000:
> Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know
> whether there is anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits"
> in the middle of 10 other deleted messages, without having to undelete
> the first four - do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
> Do bounced messages include attachments?
Yepp!
HTH,
Michael
--
Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir
PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65 40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13
Hi everyone,
Once again proving myself a total newbie :-), I would like to know whether there is
anyway in which I can undelete a message which "sits" in the middle of 10 other
deleted messages, without having to undelete the first four - does this make any kind
of sense to you?
Thank you for
clemensF muttered:
> > Michael Tatge:
>
> > So, to get the threading in the way to want it just set the Date:
> > header of that message to a reasonable value and you'll be fine.
>
> that's cool! whenever you suspect something's fishy, you just wade thru
> your email to check the sequence of da
Do bounced messages include attachments?
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/D75E0A36
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 24 May 2000:
> This tongue-in-cheek comment is actually not a bad idea: Do not
> hard-code any of the keybindings in the Mutt source, but instead set the
> defaults in the system Muttrc. This way, it is possible for a site to
> implement their pre
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:36:06AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > >> By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
> > >> curious.
> > >
> > >The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is
> > >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFC
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:36:09PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> > > I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages with deleted
> > > attachments. How about s?
> >
> > That's too already used for PGP signed but unverified messages. Maybe
> > `w' (written)?
>
> I only see (capital) S w
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:54:23PM -0400, Michael Soulier wrote:
> Ok, according to my manual, the $print variable, if set...
>
> print
>
> Type: quadoption
> Default: ask-no
>
> Controls whether or not Mutt asks for confirmation before printing. This is
> useful for people (like me) who
At 3:51 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> > At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> > > I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> > > this message resulted from , , or
> > > .
> >
> I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the
> error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-(
>
> # rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm
>error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (which is newer then
>mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6) is already installed
I do use RPMs, but
Ok, according to my manual, the $print variable, if set...
print
Type: quadoption
Default: ask-no
Controls whether or not Mutt asks for confirmation before printing. This is
useful for people (like me) who accidentally hit ``p'' often.
I have "set print" in my .muttrc file, bu
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 04:08:55PM -0300, Richard Spencer wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the
> error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-(
>
> # rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm
>error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (whic
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> > I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> > this message resulted from , , or
> > .
>
> I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages
On 2000-05-24 19:53:03 +0200, clemensF wrote:
>> Just in case your system has a /dev/random device,
>> you should most likely NOT use pgp 5.0i. pgp 2.6
>> might be a
> why's that?
In short: The keys generated are more or less bad.
See also http://cryptome.org/cipn052400.htm#pgp.
--
http://w
Hello all!
I wasn't able to install latest mutt rpm. According to the
error message, I _already_have_ the newest package :-(
# rpm -U /home/rks/ftp/mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6.i386.rpm
error: package mutt-1.0.1i-8 (which is newer then
mutt-1.2i-1.cfp.rhl6) is already installed
Whaaat'ssuuup?
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One way might be to have mutt ship with no bindings and let you roll
> all of your own ;-)
This tongue-in-cheek comment is actually not a bad idea: Do not
hard-code any of the keybindings in the Mutt source, but instead set the
defaults in the system Mutt
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:34:24PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> this message resulted from , , or
> .
>
> What do you think?
Sounds like a great idea to me. =)
- Myrddin
---
At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> this message resulted from , , or
> .
I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages with deleted
attachments. How about s?
--
coude tat: When the pers
Hey guys. I'm using mutt 1.2 on HP/UX 10.20, and I keep running into
problems with corrupt mailboxes. My inbox is having problems. It's like an
incoming mail is overwriting portions of a previous mail. At first I thought
it might be Netscape attempting to access the files, so I've redirect
Sometimes I look into the `D' flag in the index and cannot remember if I
have saved a message or deleted it. Besides, `s' and `d' are so close
on an QWERTY keyboard... And there's no way to find out. Generally I
then save it again, just to err on the safe side.
I suggest adding a new status fl
clemensF writes:
> > Thomas Roessler:
>
> > Just in case your system has a /dev/random device, you
> > should most likely NOT use pgp 5.0i. pgp 2.6 might be a
>
> why's that?
PGP 5.0ii's reading of random data from /dev/random does not work.
Instead of random numbers, a stream of bytes with
> Thomas Roessler:
> Just in case your system has a /dev/random device, you
> should most likely NOT use pgp 5.0i. pgp 2.6 might be a
why's that?
--
clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Corey G. wrote:
Mutt should print a warning if a user wants to send mail and has
quoted the way Corey did :)
IMHO this quoting style is extremly annoying. Does anyone have a link
to good documentation where I might point people using this style to?
Somethink like the Ger
Kristin Anne Igaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would very much like to use one instance of Mutt to get all my mail.
> However, I have 3 mail accounts on 3 different servers, 3 usernames, 3
> passwords... Is there any way to configure the setup so that I can
> browse all 3 using "c"?
I beli
> Michael Tatge:
> So, to get the threading in the way to want it just set the Date:
> header of that message to a reasonable value and you'll be fine.
that's cool! whenever you suspect something's fishy, you just wade thru
your email to check the sequence of dates? or did you already write th
On 2000-05-24 10:37:55 -0400, Michael Soulier wrote:
> Hi guys. I figure that PGP is probably a
> separate issue, but I'd like to learn about how
> to use it with mutt. Now, there's a little on it
> in the manual, but I guess it assumes that you
> already know what y
* Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0500)
> This is quite funny. You are explaining proper netiquette with a signature
> that contains "Fuck you". I guess netiquette and etiquette are not
> considered the same. :)
True.
My signature is just meant to bring a smile
Hello !
just get gpg on http://www.gnupg.org
read the README file and create your pair of keys
to use gpg with mutt, just add this line in your muttrc :
source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc
you can find gpg.rc in $PREFIX/doc/mutt/samples
Antoine
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 10:37:55AM -0400, Michael Soulier wr
Hi guys. I figure that PGP is probably a separate issue, but I'd like to
learn about how to use it with mutt. Now, there's a little on it in the
manual, but I guess it assumes that you already know what you're doing with
PGP, and have some kind of software already installed. I've seen ment
Gary Johnson muttered:
> All the times in the Received: headers and the From header are
> consistent, but the original poster's clock seems to be fast by an hour.
>
> Gary
>
> --
> Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Gener
> >> By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
> >> curious.
> >
> >The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is
> >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is
>
> A much better reference is any standard book on good writin
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 08:52:07PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>> But macros work!
> Just what the doctor ordered.
So we can use editor macros to change mailboxes to those folders
with long names that are so hard to type, rather than
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:37:25AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:18:07 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > When Mutt does threading, it pays attention to the message times.
>
> Right, and that is indeed the problem.
>
> > > 1003:
> > > Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 12:5
46 matches
Mail list logo
