On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:37:25AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:18:07 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > When Mutt does threading, it pays attention to the message times.
>
> Right, and that is indeed the problem.
>
> > > 1003:
> > > Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 12:56:48 +0100
> > > Subject: Mapping problem
>
> Message 1001 was sent at "Sat, 20 May 2000 07:33:38 EDT", that is
> 11.33.38 +0000 (UT)
>
> Message 1003 was sent at "Sat, 20 May 2000 12:56:48 +0100", that is
> 11.56.48 +0000 (UT)
>
> So message 1001 seems to be sent before than message 1003, and
> therefore Mutt will not treat it as a reply to message 1003.
Good observation. That sure seems to be the problem. In looking again
at the header of the original poster's message (1003), I noticed:
Received: (qmail 12169 invoked from network); 20 May 2000 10:57:35 -0000
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 12:56:48 +0100
All the times in the Received: headers and the From header are
consistent, but the original poster's clock seems to be fast by an hour.
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit
| Spokane, Washington, USA
