Re: GPG problem

2000-02-17 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So, either there is some over-enthusiastic internationalisation > > going on, or signing and RFC-2047-encoding are happening in the > > wrong order. > > The latter. Please try the attached patch. *sigh* That fixes it. Thanks. Edmund =?utf-8?Q?PGP-=C5

Re: only show new mails / remove new tag

2000-02-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi Mikko! > > No, I only see really new messages, and not the whole thread where the > > new message is in :-/ > > Oh, I misunderstood you originally. As far as I know, you can't limit > the view to specific but full threads only. All the limits work > per-message, not per-thread. That is wh

color index for list mail

2000-02-17 Thread Eric Smith
Is is possible to have mail from mailing lists coloured according to a color index recipe: a la color index brightmagentablack ~l # List mail thanx -- Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 00 27 21 4265311 It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

2000-02-17 Thread Adam Sherman
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-02-17 11:57:22 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: > > > The exact same string that I have in my muttrc for signing works fine > > on the command line. Of course, I can't use --batch or the passphrase > > fd... > > You want to cre

Mutt on an SGI...

2000-02-17 Thread Hank Driskill
I just switched to Mutt from Elm yesterday, and it seems to be working fine, but I can't seem to make the color work in an SGI "winterm" window. Any help would be greatly appreciated... I tried the normal curses support, then tried slang, neither worked in my term windows... Here's my "mutt -v"

Re: BUFFY_SIZE option

2000-02-17 Thread Erik Jacobsen
Or, from the OpenBSD man pages: The biff command appeared in 4.0BSD. biff was Heidi Stettner's dog. He died in August 1993, at 15. which suggests an earlier etymology than the hacker's dictionary. -- -e On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 10:12 AM, Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: >

Re: GPG problem

2000-02-17 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-02-17 17:59:35 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > So, either there is some over-enthusiastic internationalisation > going on, or signing and RFC-2047-encoding are happening in the > wrong order. The latter. Please try the attached patch. *sigh* -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/ Ind

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

2000-02-17 Thread Adam Sherman
Is there any way to find out exactly what mutt is doing? What command it runs and what the input and output is? Thanks, A. -- Adam Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 (613) 223-5746 PGP signature

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

2000-02-17 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-02-17 11:57:22 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: > The exact same string that I have in my muttrc for signing works fine > on the command line. Of course, I can't use --batch or the passphrase > fd... You want to create ascii-armored signatures. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/

Re: GPG problem

2000-02-17 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Aha. I've found what's going wrong. The attached public key has these MIME headers: Content-Type: application/pgp-keys Content-Description: =?utf-8?Q?PGP-=C5=9Dlosilo_0x245F71FA=2E?= Content-Disposition: attachment If you don't recognise =C5=9Dlosilo, it's "key" translated into Esperanto in UTF-

Re: applying filter to message being replied

2000-02-17 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 02:53:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : :I sometimes need to preprocess a message I 'm about to reply :(eg. to reformat it so that long lines fit at a particular screen width) : :After reading the manual and performing a search in 'comp.mail.mutt', :I am still puzzled,

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

2000-02-17 Thread Adam Sherman
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 05:40:29PM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote: > > I have --armor in the gpg sign command... Why is this happening? > > > > > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature > > > Content-Disposition: inline > > > > > > ˆ?¨ávB-· ¨™ø#¶Jǽ > > Maybe it's your key. Have you successfully

Re: applying filter to message being replied

2000-02-17 Thread Mikko Hänninen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 17 Feb 2000: > I sometimes need to preprocess a message I 'm about to reply > (eg. to reformat it so that long lines fit at a particular screen width) > > After reading the manual and performing a search in 'comp.mail.mutt', > I am still puzzled

applying filter to message being replied

2000-02-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, I sometimes need to preprocess a message I 'm about to reply (eg. to reformat it so that long lines fit at a particular screen width) After reading the manual and performing a search in 'comp.mail.mutt', I am still puzzled, whether and how it could be done. Any clues ? Thanks in advanc

Re: gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm

2000-02-17 Thread Bennett Todd
2000-02-16-16:51:43 Adam Sherman: > I have --armor in the gpg sign command... Why is this happening? Beats the heck out of me. I'm using mutt-1.0, which has custom support or gpg, which works fine; for signing to work all I needed was (in muttrc): set pgp_default_version=gpg set

Re: Problem compiling mutt on RH5.0

2000-02-17 Thread Gero Treuner
Hi! On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 03:33:58PM +0518, Vikram Vaswani wrote: > I'm running a RH5.0 box with kernel 2.2.9. Have just downloaded mutt 1.0.1, but am >unable to compile because of the following error: > > commands.c: In function `mutt_display_message': > commands.c:131: `EPIPE' undeclared (f

Problem compiling mutt on RH5.0

2000-02-17 Thread Vikram Vaswani
Hi there! I'm running a RH5.0 box with kernel 2.2.9. Have just downloaded mutt 1.0.1, but am unable to compile because of the following error: commands.c: In function `mutt_display_message': commands.c:131: `EPIPE' undeclared (first use this function) commands.c:131: (Each undeclared identifier

Re: How to change enviornment variables while in mutt

2000-02-17 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Create a wrapper shell script which sets the variables and then calls > qmail-inject (or the qmail sendmail wrapper if you prefer that). That's > the only way to change those environment variables from the values that > they had when Mutt started. > > > I t