I got it GnuPG is still not exiting with a zero status so that is why it wants me to
hit a key.
Anyway around this? To allow non-zero exits to not need a key pressed.
mIkE
Michael Connolly [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I am trying to get mutt not to ask to "Press any key..." when I encrypt or
I am trying to get mutt not to ask to "Press any key..." when I encrypt or sign a
message.
I did unset the "wait_key" variable but mutt still prompts me to hit a key.
So what I am doing wrong.
TIA
--
mIkE
Qwerty Asdfgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 01 Jan 2000:
> 1. Forward a message with full headers (so far, the f command doesn't
> include the full headers.)
If you use the "regular" forward, with the message in the body text, you
want to "set forward_weed=no". Alternatively, if you want the
I'm in the process of evaluating a MUA for one of my company's departments
to use, and so far it looks like mutt's going to be the one. This
department is going to require multiple employees to be logged into the
same mailbox simultaneously, and so far, looks like mutt's the best one at
doing that
Zbigniew Baniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 01 Jan 2000:
> But mutt should allow such thing without help of sendmail, just like
> Pine does. There's a need for additional option in muttrc, f.e.
> "set smtp_server=my.smtp.host"
Like it was pointed out to you already (I think), you can add
Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works
just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 originally specifies
two-digit year numbers, which still seem to be permitted. (Not that
any one should be using them nowadays... However, at least one user
seems to have stumbled
I'm in the process of evaluating a MUA for one of my company's departments
to use, and so far it looks like mutt's going to be the one. This
department is going to require multiple employees to be logged into the
same mailbox simultaneously, and so far, looks like mutt's the best one at
doing that
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 06:00:02PM -0700, shawn a. wrote:
> > Oh, I forgot: I think, the reason of the problem is, that I couldn't
> > persuade mutt to use other SMTP server (the "registered" one), instead of
> > the local sendmail, working on my personal machine. How to do that?
> Have you trie
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 03:24:25PM -0800, Mike Bell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> > I'm wondering, how one could set the "Return-Path:" header field properly
> > using options available in muttrc. Consider the following:
>
> Well, you can set send
