On Wed, Dec 08, 1999, Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| On 1999-12-08 01:54:57 -0700, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
|
| > Or, if that isn't feasible for some reason, then developing a
| > stand- alone "fetchimap" program would be the way to go.
|
| You are free to write such a program, and you a
On 0, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Dec 1999:
> > I am not concerned about message-id etc. I want the "realname" of the sender and
> > the "alias" name of the receiver to be there. The command line solution only has
> > email addresses
Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Dec 1999:
> I am not concerned about message-id etc. I want the "realname" of the sender and
> the "alias" name of the receiver to be there. The command line solution only has
> email addresses on them.
You mean like with:
mutt -s "Subject here" 'A.
On 0, Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> > I was wondering if I could send mail individually to a group, each addressed only
> > to them with all the mutt header informataion intact. I am not talking about Cc and
> > Bcc mail.
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> I was wondering if I could send mail individually to a group, each addressed only
> to them with all the mutt header informataion intact. I am not talking about Cc and
> Bcc mail.
>
> For example, the user AAA, BBB and CCC should get th
I was wondering if I could send mail individually to a group, each addressed only
to them with all the mutt header informataion intact. I am not talking about Cc and
Bcc mail.
For example, the user AAA, BBB and CCC should get the same email. Each will be a
seperate instance of mail. I can do thi
Sean Ahern writes:
> Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> > > How can someone take a POP mailbox and forward all the individual messages
> > > to another address, without having to do this manually?
> >
> > Use fetchmail.
>
> Which means
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 01:04:15PM -0800, Sean Ahern wrote:
> Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> > > How can someone take a POP mailbox and forward all the individual messages
> > > to another address, without having to do this manually?
Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> > How can someone take a POP mailbox and forward all the individual messages
> > to another address, without having to do this manually?
>
> Use fetchmail.
Which means that if you don't want your passwor
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> How can someone take a POP mailbox and forward all the individual messages
> to another address, without having to do this manually?
Use fetchmail.
--
- Jeff Abrahamson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
610/270-4845
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Dec 1999:
> bind index G "!yourscript\n" "Your macros's description"
Err, that should naturally start with "macro", not "bind". Silly me.
Sorry for the confusion and double post.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Scriven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 08 Dec 1999:
> Is there some way to create a macro which simply runs a shell
> command? I'd like to replace the "G" fetchmail key with a more
> powerful script..
bind index G "!yourscript\n" "Your macros's description"
Or something like that... A
How can someone take a POP mailbox and forward all the individual messages
to another address, without having to do this manually?
I understand this issue has been explained many times. I've looked at the
list archive, manual, and the FAQ but still having problems. Please excuse
me for asking this question again.
I'm getting the "Mailbox is read-only". I believe this is because I did not
setgid (not that I know what it
Hi.
Is there some way to create a macro which simply runs a shell
command? I'd like to replace the "G" fetchmail key with a more
powerful script..
_ _ _ _ ___ ___ "Use the source, Luke!"-
( \/ ( \/ (__ (__ ) | Scott Scriven (Toy Keeper / XYZZ)|
\ / \ / // /
On Wednesday, 08 December 1999 at 08:47, Chris Green wrote:
> Most times when I first connect to an IMAP4 mailbox and frequently at
> other times I get the message:-
> "Mailbox was externally modified. Flags may be wrong."
>
> Now this may be right at times but it certainly seems to me that
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:12:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:Previously I used to login to our mail server to send/receive mails. So
:any mail that I send used to have the From: header as
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] where rajukv was my login name on our server.
:Now my company has provided me with
Oops,
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:12:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> hi,
>
> Previously I used to login to our mail server to > send/receive mails. So any mail
>that I send used to > have the From: header as [EMAIL PROTECTED] where > rajukv
>was my login name on our s
hi,
Previously I used to login to our mail server to send/receive mails. So any mail that
I send used to have the From: header as [EMAIL PROTECTED] where rajukv was my
login name on our server.
Now my company has provided me with a new email ID
[EMAIL PROTECTED] All mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
> > Or, if that isn't feasible for some reason, then developing a
> > stand- alone "fetchimap" program would be the way to go.
>
> You are free to write such a program, and you are also free to
> design a generic interface between mutt and external mailbox
> backends. Note, however, that just do
On 1999-12-08 01:54:57 -0700, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> Or, if that isn't feasible for some reason, then developing a
> stand- alone "fetchimap" program would be the way to go.
You are free to write such a program, and you are also free to
design a generic interface between mutt and external mailbox
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 01:54:57AM -0700, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Brendan Cully ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> |
> | > Fetchmail I believe handles IMAP4 mailboxes quite well, why not
> | > advocate that fetching IMAP4 mail isn't mutt's job either?
> |
> | fetchmail doesn't handle
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Brendan Cully ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| > Fetchmail I believe handles IMAP4 mailboxes quite well, why not
| > advocate that fetching IMAP4 mail isn't mutt's job either?
|
| fetchmail doesn't handle IMAP4 mailboxes well. It can download mail
| from your INBOX to your spool
Most times when I first connect to an IMAP4 mailbox and frequently at
other times I get the message:-
"Mailbox was externally modified. Flags may be wrong."
Now this may be right at times but it certainly seems to me that it's
a pretty silly message to output on one's _first_ connection to a
24 matches
Mail list logo
