On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Jan Peter Hecking wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> > mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print | tr '\n' ' '`
:
> Now you're missing an newline at the end of the string. Try
>
> mailboxes `find $HOME/mail -t
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> On Aug/19/1999, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
> > You can get around this by using:
> > mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print`
>
> Doesn't work here :-) Mutt only treats as mailbox the first item in
> the list. So, if ~/ma
I have bothered Sven enough. What is the difference between
hdr_format and index_format? Did index just replace hdr? Since I set
up my .muttrc I guess with mutt 0.88 or so, that is what I have for my
indexes.
Oh, btw, someone mentioned being new to mutt and just using the stock
muttrc to learn
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Looked over that file...I see the syntax on line...but where are the
> colours actually set That appears to be my problem...I tried the
> syntax on thing that another person posted, and I got basically all bright
> white text for everything that should h
Pasting to Xjed running as Mutt's editor worked under RH5.2. With
RH6.0 and KDE it does not -- nothing happens. Pasting _from_ Xjed
while composing a message still works, but usually I want to go the
other way.
Any suggestions?
TIA,
-rex
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> > > On 990110, at 23:55:54, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > > > I took over maintenance of [the lbdb] utility and you will find it at
> > > > http://luv.rhein.de/~roland/debian/#lbdb
Hi all. Since we're talking about colors, I'm posting a question about
this too. Here's what I'm using:
rxvt, zsh, Mutt 0.96.4i (yes, it's devel but I only use the 'stable' if
it fails...) and I have set my colors to use brightwhite. The problem
is that if I have TERM=xterm-color, I get a sort of
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 05:31:37PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser spewed forth:
> No. His goal was to have transparent backgrounds if possible; if not, then
> a white background. I told him how to get a transparent background. I've
> got COLORFGBG="default;default", using S-Lang, and it works fine to ha
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 06:15:44PM -0400 or thereabouts, Fairlight wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser spewed forth:
> > Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > object for a transparent colour. My version (compiled against SLang)
> > > doesn't seem to recognize th
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 05:28:31PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
>
> Based on the symptoms and the process listing, I'd say your problem is the
> `yes` command. Try `yes 1` once from the commandline and see why I say
> that.
>
> Where the `yes` is coming from unless you configured it that way, I have
That's weird. I did that and now mutt looks great in an aterm with a
-matt
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 06:15:44PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser spewed forth:
> > Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > ... I think the manual said use the defaul
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser spewed forth:
> > Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > ... I think the manual said use the default
> > > object for a transparent colour. My version (compiled against SLang)
> > > doesn't seem to
Thanks. That worked great!
-matt
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:31:03PM +, Matthew Cordes spewed forth:
> > > Hello all. Mutt seems to draw its own background (black). How might I
> > >
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser spewed forth:
> Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > ... I think the manual said use the default
> > object for a transparent colour. My version (compiled against SLang)
> > doesn't seem to recognize that keyword at all.
>
> Acc. to th
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:31:03PM +, Matthew Cordes spewed forth:
> > Hello all. Mutt seems to draw its own background (black). How might I
> > let it simply write on top of the pixmap my terminal normally uses. I've
> > already tried removing all col
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:31:03PM +, Matthew Cordes spewed forth:
> Hello all. Mutt seems to draw its own background (black). How might I
> let it simply write on top of the pixmap my terminal normally uses. I've
> already tried removing all color entries from my muttrc and the
> backgroun
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:35:06PM +0200, Martin Maciaszek spewed forth:
> I'm using mutt 0.95.7 with pgp 6.51 (but the problem also
> appeared with pgp 2.6.3).
> When I try to sing and/or encrypt a message mutt just wait
> forever for pgp to finish. My /tmp fills slowly until it's full.
> This is
Jeremy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 12:09:23PM +, Matthew Cordes wrote:
>
> > It is not terribly difficulty. Mine bombs however when the mailto
> > includes subject information that mutt appears to not understand, yet
> > netscape's mailer and outlook have no problem
I'm using mutt 0.95.7 with pgp 6.51 (but the problem also
appeared with pgp 2.6.3).
When I try to sing and/or encrypt a message mutt just wait
forever for pgp to finish. My /tmp fills slowly until it's full.
This is what I've found with ps:
fastjack 1978 0.0 0.6 1692 780 ttyp3S22:25
Hello all. Mutt seems to draw its own background (black). How might I
let it simply write on top of the pixmap my terminal normally uses. I've
already tried removing all color entries from my muttrc and the
background is still back. If this is not possible what color attribute
do i use to chan
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 12:09:23PM +, Matthew Cordes wrote:
> It is not terribly difficulty. Mine bombs however when the mailto
> includes subject information that mutt appears to not understand, yet
> netscape's mailer and outlook have no problem with. It shouldn't be too
> difficult to ad
It is not terribly difficulty. Mine bombs however when the mailto
includes subject information that mutt appears to not understand, yet
netscape's mailer and outlook have no problem with. It shouldn't be too
difficult to add some mutt specific switches to elm.c before compiling
though. Anyone h
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:13:00AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
> Is it at all possible to use mutt from netscape? i.e. clicking on a
> mailto: spawns mutt properly--would be the main thing...
Yes, but it's non-trivial. I have Netscape set up to spawn Mutt when I
click a mailto link.
You nee
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> > X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1
> You may wish to upgrade. ;-)
Actually, that's just my version at home that came with RedHat 5.1. The
one that I just built at work is the latest. ;-)
> Umh, SMTP doesn't specify any mail fold
On 1999-08-20 19:00:49 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1
You may wish to upgrade. ;-)
> 1. My local SMTP compliant mailboxes are in $HOME/nsmail. What's the
> option to configure mutt to download my mail to say, $HOME/nsmail/Inbox?
Umh, SMTP doesn't specify any mai
Is it at all possible to use mutt from netscape? i.e. clicking on a mailto:
spawns mutt properly--would be the main thing...
I'm using netscape communicator 4.6, but wouldn't mind going w/straight
navigator if it's possible.
Any info would be greatly appreciated...
Thanks,
--
Soren
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print | tr '\n' ' '`
>
> It looks right, isn't it?
>
> It doesn't work either O:-) And I really don't know what's the fault
> now. When I put this line in my muttrc, and then
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > On 990110, at 23:55:54, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > > I took over maintenance of [the lbdb] utility and you will find it at
> > > http://luv.rhein.de/~roland/debian/#lbdb now (Source and Debian
> > > binary). Actual version is 0.12.
This URL was
28 matches
Mail list logo
