Hi,
I'll be reading a message, and when I return to the index the
pointer will sometimes jump to rest on a seemingly random message,
rather than staying on the one I was reading.
This only happens if a message has arrived in that mailbox (I use
Maildirs delivered to by maildrop) whilst I was awa
It's probably cockpit error on my part, but I get the following when
trying to extract keys:
No keys found in '/tmp/mutt-scv-cse-6-10047-119'.
Keyring add error.
Regardless of the key version or origin. There is indeed a key though.
Pretty Good Privacy(tm) 2.6.2 - Public-key encryption for th
Rejo dixit:
> ++ 17.03.1999, 10:18:31 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >set pgp_replysignencrypted
>
> Is not in the docs and gives me an unknown variable error on setup.
> Where did you take that variable from?
>From Rolan Rosenfeld's muttrc, it was on his web page.
I tried pgp_replysignencrypt
On 1999-03-17 23:16:58 +0100, Rejo wrote:
> Is not in the docs and gives me an unknown variable error on setup.
> Where did you take that variable from?
The unstable branch.
--
http://home.pages.de/~roessler/
++ 17.03.1999, 10:18:15 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>:0
>*^TO.*mutt-users@*
>mutt
>
>(just wonder if the dot makes a difference to where you put it).
You mean the dot after TO? That one definatelly does make a difference.
The dot means 'any character except a newline'. The asterix says 'any
sequ
++ 17.03.1999, 16:04:26 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> * Sender: .*mutt-users.*
>
>but then it might expect to find a dot "." after "mutt-users", instead of any
>other character (*), or?
Nope. Dot means 'any character except newline'. That's what it says in
the manpage for procmailrc.
-Rejo.
-
++ 17.03.1999, 10:18:31 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>set pgp_replysignencrypted
Is not in the docs and gives me an unknown variable error on setup.
Where did you take that variable from?
-Rejo.
--
= SISTER RAY [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] / REJO [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
= PGP: DSS B20D35F8, RSA FAE40065; f
Hello mutt users,
One of the mailing list I subscribe is very picky about which
MTA I use to post the message from.
If I post message from mutt which uses local sendmail, the message
will get rejected saying "Only subscriber may post to this list"
But if I post the message from netscape and use S
> Hmm, looking on my linux redhat system, I note there is a pdftotext
> program which will also convert pdf to text. I wonder if its part of
> xpdf?
Yep.
$ rpm -qlp xpdf-0.7a-1.i386.rpm
/etc/X11/wmconfig/xpdf
/usr/bin/pdftops
/usr/bin/pdftotext
/usr/bin/xpdf
/usr/doc/xpdf-0.7a
/usr/doc/xpdf-
In the index mode, my status line shows (date/date)
I'm using 95.4i on a Linux Redhat 4.1 system
is this a muttrc problem or something else?
TIA
--
Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All disclaimers apply...
David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Silly me; there was one obvious one that I forgot. How do I *exclude*
> a pattern or expression from the search, such as
>
> l !neff
> l !(neff|Funnies|funny)
>
> or such?
Hmm, don't understand your example. Does it mean something like
"~l
David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> I have read the manual, particularly sections 4.1 and 4.2, but still
> have a few questions about limiting and regular expressions.
I guess, I know why...
> I have found that I can "l funnies|neff" quite happily, but I cannot
> "l ~h funnies|neff" 'cuz I get an
> There have been some nice tips here lately re filters for viewing the
> text in rtf and html docs. Anyone have a pointer for a PDF viewer?
In addition to Adobe Acrobat, there is xpdf, a nice small and portable
viewer under the GPL
http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/
Regards
Petr
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:54:30PM -0500, Howard Arons wrote:
>
> There have been some nice tips here lately re filters for viewing the
> text in rtf and html docs. Anyone have a pointer for a PDF viewer?
http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/
ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/
--
_ __
On 03/17/99 Howard Arons uttered the following other thing:
> There have been some nice tips here lately re filters for viewing the
> text in rtf and html docs. Anyone have a pointer for a PDF viewer?
Well, since ghostscript can handle PDF as well as postscript, you could
modify ps2ascii to hand
On 03/17/99 Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE uttered the following other thing:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to use imap with mutt. We have a Solstice Internet Mail server
> and when I change folder to {server_name}Inbox, then mutt froze
> Fetching message headers... [2/3]
>
> and I have no options abo
On 03/17/99 Wim Peeters uttered the following other thing:
> Hello mutt-users,
>
> Is there a possibility to use mutt together with an LDAP server?
> So you can hookup in some global E-mail database?
Mutt has a generic interface to hooking to external email databases, and
there are several examp
Petr Hlustik:
|Rich Roth:
|>Randall Hopper:
|>
|> > On that thread, which [editors] support WYSIWYG text/enriched
|> > composition with Mutt?
|>
|> I think that is on the table for someone to write.
|
|Emacs has a WYSIWYG text-enriched mode. However, when I get back to Mutt,
|is there a
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
There have been some nice tips here lately re filters for viewing the
text in rtf and html docs. Anyone have a pointer for a PDF viewer?
Howard Arons
--
Powered by SuSE Linux 5.2 -- kernel 2.0.33
Communications by Mutt 0.93.2
> The issue here is that ^TO doesn't match sender, which is the
> best way I've found to match majordomo mailing lists.
Agreed.
> If someone bcc's to the list, procmail wont catch it.
Most of the bccs I get are spam, and my last (in order)
procmail recipe puts all bccs in a separate folder
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 05:36:05PM +0100, Klaus Wacker wrote:
> The .* at the end is superfluous, but you probably want to anchor the
> "Sender:" at the beginning of the line. So the line
Point. I forgot the ^.
> * ^TOmutt-(users|announce)@.*(cs.hmc.edu|mutt.org|gbnet.net)
The issue here is th
Is there a good way (without hacking the source) to disable all the
keybindings for a particular menu? I have some functions which I never use
that I don't need bound, but commenting out the bindings in ~/.muttrc
doesn't make any difference, even when I move the Muttrc file out of
/usr/local/et
Hi, folks --
Silly me; there was one obvious one that I forgot. How do I *exclude*
a pattern or expression from the search, such as
l !neff
l !(neff|Funnies|funny)
or such?
Thanks again :-)
:-D
--
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
Due to a mixup in the sendmail configuration on my machine, messages
from local users were being delivered with an extra From_ header at the
top, as in:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 27 18:25:08 1999
>From nathant Sat Feb 27 18:25:08 1999
Received: (from nathant@localhost)
[...
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
It generates
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can this be
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
It generates
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can this be
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
Most mutt installations will generate
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 04:04:26PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > * Sender: .*mutt-users.*
>
> but then it might expect to find a dot "." after "mutt-users", instead of any
> other character (*), or?
No. The regular expression . will match any character. The * will
make zero or more of th
Jeffrey Haas dixit:
>
> I would recommend instead:
> :0:
> * Sender: .*mutt-users.*
> mutt-users
>
> This is much saner in case of bcc's and other things.
but then it might expect to find a dot "." after "mutt-users", instead of any
other character (*), or?
Horacio.
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Ke
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Rejo wrote:
> :0:
> * ^TO(.*mutt-users)
> mutt-users
>
I would recommend instead:
:0:
* Sender: .*mutt-users.*
mutt-users
This is much saner in case of bcc's and other things.
> -Rejo.
--
Jeffrey Haas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Place all beliefs in
Hello mutt-users,
Is there a possibility to use mutt together with an LDAP server?
So you can hookup in some global E-mail database?
Wim
/*
Why my question:
I'm a long time elm user and consider to move to something else
mutt is one of the possibilities, so we're looking at it */
--
Wim Pe
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=uQr8t48UFsdbeI+V; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Hi
I'm trying to use imap with mutt. We have a Solstice Internet Mail server
and when I change folder to {server_name}Inbox, then mutt froze
Fetching message headers... [2/3]
and I have no options about imap in my .muttrc file
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
-HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +U
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 10:01:26AM +0100, Klaus Wacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 02:37:08AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 10:58:36AM +0100, Klaus Wacker
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As long as I have been using various versions of mutt
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 10:01:26AM +0100, Klaus Wacker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 02:37:08AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 10:58:36AM +0100, Klaus Wacker
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As long as I have been using various versions of mutt under AIX, I
> > > ha
Hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Johnny Teveßen, Stardate 130399.2319:
> My 0.96.1i does not put out an error message (at least I did
> not see one for the last couple of days), but instead the background
> of the tildes (I did not switch them off) is now bright neon green when
> I run mutt on the text console
Rejo dixit:
> Hello,
>
> When i want to reply to PGP signed and encrypted message i have
> received, Mutt automatically sets the PGP setting to encrypt. That's
> good, but is not the only thing i want. Is it possible to have Mutt auto
> encrypt /and sign/ when responding to an encrypted and signe
Rejo dixit:
> ++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
> >Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> >criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
>
> I have now (in procmail):
>
> :0:
> * ^TO([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> mutt-users
>
> Which
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=neYutvxvOLaeuPCA; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
++ 15.03.1999, 13:23:56 (+0100) = Holger Eitzenberger:
>Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
>criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
I have now (in procmail):
:0:
* ^TO([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])
mutt-users
Which probably could be rewritten to
:
Hello,
When i want to reply to PGP signed and encrypted message i have
received, Mutt automatically sets the PGP setting to encrypt. That's
good, but is not the only thing i want. Is it possible to have Mutt auto
encrypt /and sign/ when responding to an encrypted and signed message?
-Rejo.
--
45 matches
Mail list logo
