Thank you all for the responses. The GNU patch did indeed work.
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
I put the attached little script together to provide an easy way to
decode and view the X-Face: attachments that are frequently included
in e-mail headers. Now I can just pipe an X-Face-equiped mail message
into the showface script to see who sent me e-mail. The showface
script will extract the
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 09:10:53AM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 12:21:05 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you are using a non-standard ispell which does NOT
> > > accept '-x', you can always 'set ispell=/path/to/isp
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 12:21:05 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you are using a non-standard ispell which does NOT accept '-x', you
> > can always 'set ispell=/path/to/ispell' in your muttrc.
>
> No you can't, because it's hard-coded in the so
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999, john manoogian III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| how can i have a send-hook -like function that will be called *after*
| i compose a message? i want to post-process a message after i compose
| it, but i couldn't find a function to do it, since send-hook happens
| before you c
how does one configure mutt to use gpg? simply use the pgp variables and
guess which ones relate to gpg? is there a doc on this somewhere? the
manual doesn't say much about this...
thanks,
--
brian kowolowski
Can someone tell me where sendmail picks up the SENDER name when using
mutt? ie how does sendmail resolve the $x macro?
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
I've been using elm for OS/2 for several years, and would like to
convert over to mutt, but can't seem to get my mail headers formatte
At 8:09 AM EST on March 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
> Please, could anyone send to me the variables that need to be added in
> ~/.muttrc for mutt-i to work with pgp versions 2.6.3i and 5.0i, and with gpg
> altogether? (or, a muttrc file with all of them)
I recommend you look at Roland Rosenf
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:32:28AM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
> On 03/12/99 David DeSimone uttered the following other thing:
> > Daniel Brahneborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what is the syntax for imap subfolders?
> >
> > {server.name}subfolder_name
>
> And if you want to se
hi,
how can i have a send-hook -like function that will be called *after*
i compose a message? i want to post-process a message after i compose
it, but i couldn't find a function to do it, since send-hook happens
before you compose the body. this would be analogous to a sending
filter in pine, e
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 03:34:37PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
> > I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
> > Anyone know what the problem is?
> Solaris has it's own 'patch' which is not Larry Wall's patch.
Sorry, further on thi
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I
> have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I
> run 'patch < ' I get the following:
> The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> The
Ken W writes:
> Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I
> have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I
> run 'patch < ' I get the following:
>
> The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> The next patch looks like a unified contex
++ 13.03.1999, 14:09:06 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>I don't know if what you suggest would fiddle with the signature and then
>produce a bad sig. Is there no other way to choose between an attached
>signature and a text signed message with mutt?
No, it wouldn't produce a bad signature. You can
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Matt Beauregard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > You can change the background color using the color object 'tilde', and can
> > make the background transparent by setting the color as 'default', eg:
> >
> > color tilde brightblack
Hi
I want threads to be my default mailbox sorting method.
Now, I need to go `s' then `t' to initialise it or
`: source .muttrc' but my .muttrc should be initialised already as I have
all the other settings as soon as I start up mutt.
here is a :r !grep sort .muttrc
set sort=threads
Rejo dixit:
> ++ 12.03.1999, 17:45:14 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >I most times see pgp signed messages as an attachment in mutt, though others
> >I see the signatures in the body of the messages. Why and how's this
> >difference? How can one and another been achieved?
>
> This is because th
According to Robert Chien:
> Don't know how to fix it though, I had to apply the patch manually
> (luckily, it was a short one :). I'm not a developer, but I would
> certainly like to know the solution as well.
Can you do a "ident" or "what" on your patch binary ? I wonder which
version of patch
I could do it from the command line or within mutt.
I'm using version 0.95.3us.
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:09:13PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
> On 990308, at 18:50:28, The Beast from the East wrote:
> > Did you set the "record" variable? This variable has no default
> > so you may have to set
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> You can change the background color using the color object 'tilde', and can
> make the background transparent by setting the color as 'default', eg:
>
> color tilde brightblack default
>
> You can turn it off using 'unset tilde'
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:16:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> does gpg work in place of pgp for mutt use?
Yes. (Though you need to build mutt to recognize it.)
> how good is gpg?
On systems with /dev/random (ie, Linux and some of the BSDs), it's
great. On lesser systems, it needs som
22 matches
Mail list logo
