Re: This mail-list archives

1999-02-10 Thread Ethan Blanton
Brandon Long spake unto us the following wisdom: > > I have a number of query scripts on my page at > http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/ > All of these seem to be LDAP scripts to me (as I expected from the mail this was in response to). Does anyone know of an x.500 script/directory se

Re: This mail-list archives

1999-02-10 Thread Brandon Long
On 02/10/99 Ryan Murray uttered the following other thing: > On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 05:06:43PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > Current system on www.egroups.com is very slow and > > > not so convenient. > > Nice way of putting it. egroups sucks outright. And it's incomplete. > > It works fine

Re: macro vs. typing keys in

1999-02-10 Thread David DeSimone
Randall J. Million <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am having trouble determining the difference between typing keys in > manually and using push or macro. Timing. > set editor='echo ok > ' > macro index y 'rn' > > If I it y in the index i get an error 'Aborted unmodified message.' If >

Re: folder-hook problem?

1999-02-10 Thread Christian Kurz
Dale Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using Mutt 0.95i (1998-12-12), a Linux box. Is there something wrong > with folder-hook or am I just doing it wrong. For example, I have: > folder-hook foobar set attribution="On %d, %n snarled:" > folder-hook foobar set realname="Dale the confused"

Re: macro vs. typing keys in

1999-02-10 Thread Randall J. Million
> On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 12:14:07AM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote: > > set editor='echo ok > ' > ^ Did you forget a '%s' here? No, that completely breaks it. And the manual mentions nothing about have a %s in place of the file name. I assume the file name is just appe

Re: folder-hook problem?

1999-02-10 Thread Stefan Troeger
Hi, On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 21:20 -0800, Dale Harris wrote: > I'm using Mutt 0.95i (1998-12-12), a Linux box. Is there something wrong > with folder-hook or am I just doing it wrong. For example, I have: > > folder-hook foobar set attribution="On %d, %n snarled:" > folder-hook foobar set rea

Re: macro vs. typing keys in

1999-02-10 Thread Gero Treuner
Hi! On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 12:14:07AM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote: > set editor='echo ok > ' ^ Did you forget a '%s' here? Gero -- > Hi! I'm Signature Virus 99! Copy me into your signature and join the fun!

Re: list is still sending doubles

1999-02-10 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 10:35:08AM +, Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:26:42PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I realize that most of you have filters which keep you f

macro vs. typing keys in

1999-02-10 Thread Randall J. Million
I am having trouble determining the difference between typing keys in manually and using push or macro. I start from a deafult mutt configuration (mutt -F /dev/null) and set the following: set editor='echo ok > ' macro index y 'rn' If I it y in the index i get an error 'Aborted unmodif

folder-hook problem?

1999-02-10 Thread Dale Harris
Hi, I'm using Mutt 0.95i (1998-12-12), a Linux box. Is there something wrong with folder-hook or am I just doing it wrong. For example, I have: folder-hook foobar set attribution="On %d, %n snarled:" folder-hook foobar set realname="Dale the confused" in my .muttrc to apply some rules when I