Re: Use From-address fqdn for Message-ID Generation

2021-11-23 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:22:33AM -0600, Aaron Poffenberger wrote: > On 2021-11-22 16:48 +, Claus Assmann wrote: > > I'm not sure the problem is really related to "fqdn of the Message-ID", > > could you give a real example: > > sending from the same host using the same addresses but two diffe

Re: Use From-address fqdn for Message-ID Generation

2021-11-23 Thread Aaron Poffenberger
On 2021-11-23 14:47 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > sbcglobal.net will fail delivery of the message with the following error: > > > > @*sbcglobal.net*: 550 5.7.1 Connections not accepted from > > servers without a valid sender domain.alph758 Fix reverse DNS for > > 198.51.100.1 > > It's just told

Re: Use From-address fqdn for Message-ID Generation

2021-11-23 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 04:40:28PM -0600, Aaron Poffenberger wrote: > On 2021-11-23 14:47 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > > sbcglobal.net will fail delivery of the message with the following error: > > > > > > @*sbcglobal.net*: 550 5.7.1 Connections not accepted from > > > servers without a valid s

Re: Use From-address fqdn for Message-ID Generation

2021-11-23 Thread Aaron Poffenberger
On 2021-11-23 17:28 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > My mail domain has had correct reverse DNS entries for ages. As soon > > as I received the error I verified it from multiple hosts to be sure. > > Well, the IP you gave for it does not resolve, as I already showed > you--not on my laptop at home,

Re: Use From-address fqdn for Message-ID Generation

2021-11-23 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Aaron Poffenberger wrote: > On 2021-11-23 17:28 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > > My mail domain has had correct reverse DNS entries for ages. As soon > > > as I received the error I verified it from multiple hosts to be sure. > > > > Well, the IP you gave

Re: Use From-address fqdn for Message-ID Generation

2021-11-23 Thread Claus Assmann
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021, Aaron Poffenberger wrote: > > > I know this is related to Message-ID... > > I'll back off this claim because I can't prove it beyond doubt. I've Of course you could. I explained how to do it, but (so far) you haven't done that -- hence all those replies from people being sc