Hi Kevin,
On Friday, 2019-06-21 13:26:22 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:03:23PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > I would not like to have all '-' replaced by '_' in attachments
> > (specifically I personally use '-' instead of '_' except when I need
> > some differentia
On 2019-06-22 21:53:11 -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On 2019-06-22 16:47, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > The manual says:
> >
> > %l number of lines in the message
> > (does not work with maildir, mh,
> >
On 2019-06-23 14:44:36 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Were it a simple filename it would all be easy. Maybe a chdir(tmpdir)
> before running the shell command with a simple filename?
I'm not sure whether this is a good idea. The temporary directory
may be (and often is) world-writable, and on mul
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Ah ok I thought sanitizing was also used when saving attachments.
As was mentioned elsewhere prefixing './' might be best if it starts
with '-' and a path is not prepended (can that even happen?).
Only in send mode (i.e. from the comp
On 2019-06-23 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
...the provided "Lines:" header is not necessarily reliable.
Right. I've seen it wrong many times.
Not from Mutt--when Mutt writes a message to an mbox file, it generates
Lines: and Content-Length:, both correctly. But Mutt is not the only
program
On 23Jun2019 12:36, vincent lefevre wrote:
On 2019-06-23 14:44:36 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Were it a simple filename it would all be easy. Maybe a chdir(tmpdir)
before running the shell command with a simple filename?
I'm not sure whether this is a good idea. The temporary directory
may
