Hi Kevin, On Friday, 2019-06-21 13:26:22 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:03:23PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > I would not like to have all '-' replaced by '_' in attachments > > (specifically I personally use '-' instead of '_' except when I need > > some differentiation). It may also complicate things if for some reason > > the file name is mentioned or referenced elsewhere and not identical. > > > > I'd rather much prefer to treat a leading '-' as a special case here. > > This is referring to filename sanitizing for mailcap invocation: > mutt_sanitize_filename(). The change isn't preserved outside of the > invocation, and isn't used to otherwise modify the filenames of attachments. > > Does your concern still apply in those circumstances? Ah ok I thought sanitizing was also used when saving attachments. As was mentioned elsewhere prefixing './' might be best if it starts with '-' and a path is not prepended (can that even happen?). Eike -- OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A Use LibreOffice! https://www.libreoffice.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
