On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:30:51PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Hi Allen!
>
> Thanks for your favorable feedback on the new patch. Have you had a
> chance to test it for a while?
I’ve been testing it for about a day now :) But I will now be using it daily
and I’ll let you know if anything
changeset: 6484:b3c095648df6
user: Vsevolod Volkov
date: Thu Aug 20 11:18:05 2015 -0700
link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/b3c095648df6
Updated Russian translation.
diffs (truncated from 3055 to 950 lines):
diff -r 83760f05bb46 -r b3c095648df6 po/ru.po
--- a/po/ru.po Wed Aug
egbert. wrote:
> So we can have one config var for ‘socket timeout on idle’. This
> is to solve the hanging mutt problem which people (like me) are
> complaining about when you pack up your laptop and go somewhere
> else. And, it can be the same value for read and write.
> Then, when you are sendi
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:29:32AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> egbert. wrote:
> > So we can have one config var for ‘socket timeout on idle’. This
> > is to solve the hanging mutt problem which people (like me) are
> > complaining about when you pack up your laptop and go somewhere
> > else.
I implemented something similar for another client and disagree
viciously ;) The proper timeout depends in the network, and asking the
user is a cop-out.
I am currently on vacation at a farm in Italy, very
nice and not just because of the free wlan, but the configuration of
the network here i
[Moved to mutt-dev]
On 2015-08-19 09:49:15 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote:
> > While translating the messages I noticed some messages exceed 80 columns.
> > For
> > example:
> >
> > #: smime.c:2064
> > msgid ""
> > "S/MIME (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, encrypt (w)ith, sign (a)s, (b)oth,
On 2015-08-20 07:49:11 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Am 2015-08-19 23:34, schrieb Kevin J. McCarthy:
> >>2) I don't know for how long we have been running mutt with the trash
> >>folder patch. It looks quite clean to me. So would you consider
> >>integrating this patch upstream?
FYI, I had be
On 2015-08-21 01:33:10 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-08-20 07:49:11 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Fifth, http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash also mentions
> >The folder history doesn't clutter up with unwanted trash entries.
> >
> > (I am not sure, what is meant wit
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Fifth, http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash also mentions
> >The folder history doesn't clutter up with unwanted trash entries.
> >
> > (I am not sure, what is meant with this one)
>
> In "=INBOX.Trash", the "=INBOX.Trash" will be
> saved to the history, a
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-08-20 07:49:11 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Am 2015-08-19 23:34, schrieb Kevin J. McCarthy:
> > >>2) I don't know for how long we have been running mutt with the trash
> > >>folder patch. It looks quite clean to me.
10 matches
Mail list logo
