* Will Fiveash on Saturday, April 06, 2013 at 18:31:46 -0500
> While I don't have a specific project in mind I'm thinking there must be
> some existing open source projects that could serve as a model for mutt
> development. I'd also like to see mutt move to github partially so it
> would be easie
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:04:16PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Will Fiveash on Saturday, April 06, 2013 at 18:31:46 -0500
> > While I don't have a specific project in mind I'm thinking there must be
> > some existing open source projects that could serve as a model for mutt
> > development.
On 28/03/2013, Michael Elkins wrote:
> The mbox format is the only one that can't store deleted messages.
> If you really need this feature, you will need to switch to
> another format, such as maildir.
Thanks, Michael. In the past, I already considered switching to
maildir, but never had a good
>> Or, as Mutt is maintained in a Mercurial repo, to bitbucket.
Git is largely becoming, if not already, the defacto overall long
term replacement to the post-CVS version control competition.
It's pretty much everywhere now, and therefore commands, and
will command, as common language, the largest
Projects should also compile highlights, why us's, and advertise
for developers if those coming to you as developer-users are few
and far between.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:26:21AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> >> Or, as Mutt is maintained in a Mercurial repo, to bitbucket.
>
> Git is largely becoming, if not already, the defacto overall long
> term replacement to the post-CVS version control competition.
> It's pretty much everywhere now, and t
