4 new changesets in mutt:
http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/6447ebe80797
changeset: 5926:6447ebe80797
branch: HEAD
tag: tip
user:Rocco Rutte
date:Sat Jun 20 23:09:45 2009 +0200
summary: f=f: Don't kill signature separator when stripping trailing
spaces. Closes #3
#3276: iswupper() replacement gets it backward
---+
Reporter: dhduvall | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: charset | Ve
#1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc
headers
-+--
Reporter: Marco d'Itri | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: min
[Leaving this discussion out of the bug report, as it has no place
there, since it has nothing to do with the bug.]
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:09:53AM -, Mutt wrote:
> Replying to [comment:7 Derek Martin]:
> > It is likewise explicitly allowed in RFCs 2822, and 822, and 733.
> >
> > Note t
#3277: smime_keys uses obsolete perl module
-+--
Reporter: raorn| Owner: mutt-dev
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: mutt |
Hello,
Probably for the first time I feel I'm getting satisfying performance
while opening large folders using tokyocabinet and headercache on
maildir format on cold caches (compression option enabled by default,
and maildir_header_cache_verify=no).
But with vmstat 1 I noticed that when tokyocabi
Hi,
* Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> If there is interest I can do both
> changes myself and repost a proper patch, this is a local hack for
> myself so far.
I think making it faster is always good. However, there're some more
points that would have to be solved to get the patch ready for
inclusion
On 2009-06-20 07:59:04 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Vincent Lefevre [06-20-09 05:52]:
> > Are these the only possibly assignments? Isn't it possible to do:
> >
> > set my_foo=$my_bar
> >
> > or
> >
> > set status_format="-%r-Mutt: %f...%>-(%P)-$timeout--"
>
> Very simple to determine
On 2009-06-21 09:01:24 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> A proposed standard is just that: proposed. It is not a standard
> until it is *accepted* and "elevated" by the IETF. Proposed, Draft,
> and Internet Standards are 3 levels of maturity of specifications
> written with the *intent* of becoming st
On 20Jun2009 07:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
| * Vincent Lefevre [06-20-09 05:52]:
| > Are these the only possibly assignments? Isn't it possible to do:
| > set my_foo=$my_bar
| > or
| > set status_format="-%r-Mutt: %f...%>-(%P)-$timeout--"
|
| Very simple to determine yourself, just try it!
On 20Jun2009 11:51, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| On 2009-06-19 23:43:24 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
| > * Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| > > Whenever a user-defined variable is used in an assignment for a built-in
| > > variable or vice versa, Mutt string representations to do the
| > > assignment. As a
11 matches
Mail list logo
