#1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc
headers
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: mutt | Version: 1.5.20
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Comment(by vinc17):
Replying to [comment:7 Derek Martin]:
> It is likewise explicitly allowed in RFCs 2822, and 822, and 733.
>
> Note that 822 and 733 are standards; the more recent ones are not (not
> that it matters in this case).
No, RFC 2822 is a ''proposed standard'' therefore '''is a standard'''.
From RFC 4677:
{{{
There are six kinds of RFCs:
o Proposed standards
o Draft standards
o Internet standards (sometimes called "full standards")
o Informational documents
o Experimental protocols
o Historic documents
Only the first three (proposed, draft, and full) are standards within
the IETF.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/1611#comment:8>
Mutt <http://www.mutt.org/>
The Mutt mail user agent
