Alain Bench wrote: [Fri Mar 07 2008, 08:50:09AM EST]
> A quick search on 16668 mails here found 424 false positives.
> Example the message at origin of this thread is sent by Brian Medley
> . It's not uncommon to use such
> specific aliases for mailing list subscriptions, Bill and Kyle are als
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:54:46AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
No,
I don't think that currently works; I'll work on it.
Thanks for the idea!!
> On 28-02-2008 23:35:03 -0600, Brian Medley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of
> > the currently
On Wednesday, March 5, 2008 at 11:27:02 -0500, Aron Griffis wrote:
>| subscribe mutt-dev@
> will it cause a false positive in any common case?
A quick search on 16668 mails here found 424 false positives.
Example the message at origin of this thread is sent by Brian Medley
. It's not uncommo
Hi Alain,
Alain Bench wrote: [Tue Mar 04 2008, 12:38:12PM EST]
> >| subscribe mutt-dev@
>
> Note that this pre-1.5.6-like syntax is guaranteed to provide false
> positives.
Well, I know it's loose, but will it cause a false positive in
any common case?
Aron
Hello Brian, and thank you for proposing this interesting feature,
On Thursday, February 28, 2008 at 23:35:03 -0600, Brian Medley wrote:
> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of the
> currently selected message.
>| OP_COMPOSE_SENDER "compose new message to sender"
Hello Aron,
On Monday, March 3, 2008 at 9:01:31 -0500, Aron Griffis wrote:
>| subscribe mutt-dev@
Note that this pre-1.5.6-like syntax is guaranteed to provide false
positives. One should now better write as strict as possible regexps:
| subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| send-hook '~C [EMAIL P
On 2008-03-03, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rado S wrote: [Mon Mar 03 2008, 06:50:41AM EST]
> > Gary's solution is probably closer to what you expect(ed), but mine
> > has no magic with it: I simply define all my MLs as "ml-..." alias
> > and hit 'm' as usual to start a new msg.
>
>
On 2008-03-03, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-02 15:04:27 +, N.J. Mann wrote:
>
> >> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender
> >> of the currently selected message. In addition, I think I
> >> updated The Manual correctly.
>
> > Great idea.
>
Rado S wrote: [Mon Mar 03 2008, 06:50:41AM EST]
> Gary's solution is probably closer to what you expect(ed), but mine
> has no magic with it: I simply define all my MLs as "ml-..." alias
> and hit 'm' as usual to start a new msg.
How funny, I do exactly the same thing. I do it in m4 with:
c
=- Patrick Shanahan wrote on Sun 2.Mar'08 at 15:52:13 -0500 -=
> > > > Would be great if there were also a 'compose to list'
> > > > option. Not sure if it would be better to have the function
> > > > compose to the list if the message is to a subscribed list,
> > > > or to have a different comma
On 2008-03-03 10:38:09 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2008-03-03 04:38:43 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > But is there a way to automatically remove some headers, such as
> > "Delivered-To:"?
>
> If I remember correctly, it does remove some headers. Might be that
> some more should be dropp
On 2008-03-03 04:38:43 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> But is there a way to automatically remove some headers, such as
> "Delivered-To:"?
If I remember correctly, it does remove some headers. Might be that
some more should be dropped.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2008-03-02 15:04:27 +, N.J. Mann wrote:
>> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender
>> of the currently selected message. In addition, I think I
>> updated The Manual correctly.
> Great idea.
>> Suggestions/Thoughts/Criticism are welcome.
> I didn't compile without
On 2008-02-29 09:32:01 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2008-02-29 09:08:08 +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > This would be useful, for instance, in situations where the
> > message could not be sent because of, say, a problem with finding
> > a smarthost to send the message.
>
> resend-messa
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:04:33PM -0800, Breen Mullins wrote:
> * Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-03 13:43 +1100]:
>
> >
> > I get the headers as part of the message to edit, I have always done
> > this and I think it comes from setting edit_header. I am happy to add
> > the subje
* Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-03 13:43 +1100]:
I get the headers as part of the message to edit, I have always done
this and I think it comes from setting edit_header. I am happy to add
the subject there. I would prefer to not have to hit enter when
No Subject: Abort? ([Ye
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:48:30PM -0800, Gary A. Johnson wrote:
> On 2008-03-03, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:30:42PM -0800, Gary A. Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > * Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [
On 2008-03-03, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:30:42PM -0800, Gary A. Johnson wrote:
> > On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> > > > =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:30:42PM -0800, Gary A. Johnson wrote:
> On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> > > =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:32:19 +0100 -=
> > > > On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley
On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> > =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:32:19 +0100 -=
> > > On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would be great if there were also a 'compose to li
* Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:32:19 +0100 -=
> > On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> >
> > > Would be great if there were also a 'compose to list' option.
> > > Not sure if it would be better to have the function
=- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:32:19 +0100 -=
> On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
>
> > Would be great if there were also a 'compose to list' option.
> > Not sure if it would be better to have the function compose to
> > the list if the message is to a subscrib
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brian Medley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of
> the currently selected message. In addition, I think I updated
> The Manual correctly.
Great idea.
> Suggestions/Thoughts/Criticism are welcome
On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> Would be great if there were also a 'compose to list' option. Not
> sure if it would be better to have the function compose to the
> list if the message is to a subscribed list, or to have a
> different command for "compose to list".
Why isn'
On 2008-02-29 09:08:08 +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> One related question: does mutt already offer the possibility to
> resend(bounce?) a mesage exactly to those addresses it has already been
> sent to ?
> This would be useful, for instance, in situations where the message
> could not be sent
Hi,
One related question: does mutt already offer the possibility to
resend(bounce?) a mesage exactly to those addresses it has already been
sent to ?
This would be useful, for instance, in situations where the message
could not be sent because of, say, a problem with finding a smarthost to
send t
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:35:03PM -0600, Brian Medley wrote:
>
> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of
> the currently selected message. In addition, I think I updated
> The Manual correctly.
Would be great if there were also a 'compose to list' option. Not sure
if i
On 2008-02-28, Brian Medley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of
> the currently selected message. In addition, I think I updated
> The Manual correctly.
>
> Suggestions/Thoughts/Criticism are welcome.
Terrific! I've wanted this
On 28-02-2008 23:35:03 -0600, Brian Medley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of
> the currently selected message. In addition, I think I updated
> The Manual correctly.
>
> Suggestions/Thoughts/Criticism are welcome.
That is a great feature I've tho
29 matches
Mail list logo
