> > And even if they aren't necessary, one doesn't necessarily want to
> > remove them. For instance:
> > From: firstname "pseudo" surname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > In short, if the sender has added unnecessary quotes, this may be for
> > a good reason, and it may be better to keep them.
You have
On Saturday, 19 May 2007 at 02:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-05-18 14:41:19 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > On Friday, 18 May 2007 at 23:37, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > I disagree. Removing quotes can also confuse the user, just like this
> > > can confuse a mail software. For instance, con
On 2007-05-18 14:41:19 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Friday, 18 May 2007 at 23:37, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I disagree. Removing quotes can also confuse the user, just like this
> > can confuse a mail software. For instance, consider the following
> > "From:" header:
> >
> > From: "<[EMAIL PR
On Friday, 18 May 2007 at 23:37, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-05-18 08:33:36 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > The idea is that the quotes are essentially an artifact of the internal
> > formatting of RFC 822-style email (aka: ALL email), and shouldn't be
> > displayed in their literal form any
On 2007-05-18 08:33:36 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> The idea is that the quotes are essentially an artifact of the internal
> formatting of RFC 822-style email (aka: ALL email), and shouldn't be
> displayed in their literal form any more than any of the other encoding
> details should be.
I dis
On Friday, May 18 at 08:56 AM, quoth Mun Johl:
For some reason, when I receive email from a colleague, the From:
line looks like this (of course, without the indentation):
From: email_address // format 1
rather than this:
From: First Last// format 2
Huh. That is strange. Check out
> I'm trying to figure out where in the email transmission/reception
> process the names are being stripped for me, and why. But after looking
> at my raw mbox, this is not a mutt issue.
I think the problem is that Outlook doesn't quote properly, and never has.
It purely quotes the hell out o
Hi Kyle, et al.,
First, my apologies for double posting my original email.
Please see my comments below.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:33 AM PDT, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
... Text Deleted ...
KW> The idea is that the quotes are essentially an artifact of the internal
KW> formatting of RFC 822-style
On Thursday, May 17 at 05:06 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The company I work for as defined everyone's email addresses as:
"First Last" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...okay...
Mutt seems pretty smart and automatically adds/removes the double
quotes on the outgoing email based on one's name (e.g., if
Hi,
The company I work for as defined everyone's email addresses as:
"First Last" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mutt seems pretty smart and automatically adds/removes the double quotes
on the outgoing email based on one's name (e.g., if a period is used).
But my company uses the double quotes on all add
10 matches
Mail list logo
