Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-20 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Saturday, 2016-03-05 14:31:16 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > If you haven't tried out hg tip in a while, now would be a good time to > start testing it. Fwiw, I'm using tip since a few months on my private machine and since a few weeks also in daily work, one Maildir and ~3-5 IMAP serv

Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-03-07 11:24:50 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Okay, that sounds reasonable. I would like the get the two additions to > the -E patch in, just to make it usable. Yes, I think that's necessary. > > I'm attaching 2 patches made by other users and which I've updated > > for the latest cha

Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-07 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:21:51PM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > On a different since the new openssl release I would sometimes get a fault. > > Don't know if this has something to do with the new SSL. I thought I heard there was a need to recompile binaries with the new patched library. You may wa

Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-07 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > patch-1.5.23hg.dm.domain.vl.1 is from Derek Martin, written in 2013, > and I've modified the patch to avoid a memory leak. It fixes: > https://dev.mutt.org//trac/ticket/3298 Nice catch, looks good. :-) -- Derek D. Martinhtt

Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-07 Thread The Doctor
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:24:50AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2016-03-05 14:31:16 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > There are a few more things I want to finish up (the -E patch > > > improvements and reviewing outst

Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-07 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-03-05 14:31:16 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > There are a few more things I want to finish up (the -E patch > > improvements and reviewing outstanding patches), so I propose the > > following schedule: > > - 3/19 last

Re: 1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-03-05 14:31:16 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > There are a few more things I want to finish up (the -E patch > improvements and reviewing outstanding patches), so I propose the > following schedule: > - 3/19 last day for non-bugfix commits. translation strings frozen. I think that unt

1.6.0 proposed schedule

2016-03-05 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
I'd like to start things moving for a 1.6.0 release. As David and I talked about, this will be significant in at least a couple ways. It will be the first "stable" release of the long under development 1.5 branch (14+ years!). Additionally, we will be moving away from the odd/even release number