* jpac...@redhat.com [2013-10-31 13:20]:
> > But the solution is not to give everyone commit access.
>
> Don't get me wrong, but a high-quality patch in conjunction with
> constructive track ticket seems enough for accepting the person as a
> commiter into (and only into) the quick-moving partly
* Derek Martin [2013-10-24 10:46]:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:05:07PM +0200, Holger Weiß wrote:
> > > Of course, but they build only a minority and therefore if the others
> > > don't like their work, why not to revert the commit or rewrite the patch
> > >
* jpac...@redhat.com [2013-10-24 15:02]:
> Anyway, you sound like a usual mutt user, who prefers stability over
> new-features (this is the trade-off you've mentioned) and therefore you
> can stay calm - you'll get the same quality of stable releases like up
> until now (no changes in the stable r
* [2013-10-24 10:33]:
> > i've been maintainer of sufficiently many projects to know that this
> > is not a universally true statement. a significant percentage of casual
> > contributors throws some crappy code at you and expects you to be
> > grateful for it, possibly flaming you down when you m
