Hello!
Cameron Simpson has written on Saturday, 9 April, at 9:24:
>I think choosing git vs hg should not be a "what is more popular" decision,
>_especially_ for projects (versus users individually). IMO opinion hg is
>superior. Also, there's a robust hg-git extension that will talk to git
Hello!
Kevin J. McCarthy has written on Monday, 23 November, at 12:26:
>Now, that's not the patch's fault: mutt doesn't have any "plugin" hooks.
>It would be nice if we did, but it won't happen for 1.6.0. When I have
>some more time, I'll try to look more closely at the patch and see if
>ther
Hello!
Will Yardley has written on Monday, 23 November, at 21:51:
>My vote is for not including NNTP; like it or not, barely anyone
>supports it anymore (even when I worked at a fairly old school
>university, we phased our our NNTP servers several years ago, and all of
>my ISPs have shut down
Hello!
Kevin J. McCarthy has written on Sunday, 22 November, at 20:01:
>I believe we're on the same page here. I was originally thinking about
>one more 1.5.x release just to give more time, but I'm definitely open
>to just pushing straight for a 1.6.0 as the next release. Recently,
>I've m
Hello!
acefael has written on Sunday, 3 May, at 12:06:
>the diff removes "puts (_(Copyright));"
>and it adds the loop wherein it calls "puts (_(Copyright[i]));".
>agreed?
Mea culpa. I paid not enough attention to the diff, I'm sorry. Your
recent patch looks pretty much fine although if
Hello!
I have written on Sunday, 3 May, at 12:14:
>Eike Rathke has written on Saturday, 2 May, at 23:58:
>>On Saturday, 2015-05-02 13:32:23 +0100, acefael wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> +"Many others not mentioned here contributed code, fixes," ,
>>> +"and suggestions." };
>>>
>>> - puts (_(Co
Hello!
Eike Rathke has written on Saturday, 2 May, at 23:58:
>On Saturday, 2015-05-02 13:32:23 +0100, acefael wrote:
>> [...]
>> +"Many others not mentioned here contributed code, fixes," ,
>> +"and suggestions." };
>>
>> - puts (_(Copyright));
>> + {
>> +int csize = size
Hello!
Vincent Lefevre has written on Monday, 6 August, at 15:21:
>Anyway, whether the ISP allows direct SMTP access (in France, there's
>the choice) or not, a MTA (or the package from the OS distribution)
>should be easy to configure for the most common uses; this is the case
>in Debian, wit
Hello!
Derek Martin has written on Sunday, 5 August, at 22:06:
>On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:58:19AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> An ISP is there to provide full, unfiltered Internet access. If the
>> user has chosen as ISP that blocks some ports, that's his problem.
>You'd better stay in
