Re: [Mutt] #3794: Complier warnings on OS X 10.11.1 with Xcode 7.1.1

2015-11-24 Thread Mutt
#3794: Complier warnings on OS X 10.11.1 with Xcode 7.1.1 -+- Reporter: chdiza | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: SMTP|Version: Resolution: | Keywords:

Re: [Mutt] #3794: Complier warnings on OS X 10.11.1 with Xcode 7.1.1

2015-11-24 Thread Mutt
#3794: Complier warnings on OS X 10.11.1 with Xcode 7.1.1 -+- Reporter: chdiza | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: SMTP|Version: Resolution: | Keywords:

Re: [Mutt] #3795: "Bad IDN" warning for alias groups

2015-11-24 Thread Mutt
#3795: "Bad IDN" warning for alias groups -+- Reporter: chdiza | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: SMTP|Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: -

mutt: Fix bad idn error on local mailboxes. (closes #3795)

2015-11-24 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6532:94186a96ca17 user: Kevin McCarthy date: Tue Nov 24 21:45:58 2015 -0800 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/94186a96ca17 Fix bad idn error on local mailboxes. (closes #3795) Commit 831abf39d53a pulled the mbox_to_udomain() call inside the conversion functions. U

Re: [Mutt] #3795: "Bad IDN" warning for alias groups

2015-11-24 Thread Mutt
#3795: "Bad IDN" warning for alias groups -+- Reporter: chdiza | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: SMTP|Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -+--

[Mutt] #3795: "Bad IDN" warning for alias groups

2015-11-24 Thread Mutt
#3795: "Bad IDN" warning for alias groups +- Reporter: chdiza | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: SMTP|Version: Keywords: | +-

[Mutt] #3794: Complier warnings on OS X 10.11.1 with Xcode 7.1.1

2015-11-24 Thread Mutt
#3794: Complier warnings on OS X 10.11.1 with Xcode 7.1.1 +- Reporter: chdiza | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: SMTP|Version: Keywords: | +-

Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Implement support SMTPUTF8 support

2015-11-24 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:29:21PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > This series is based around Arnt Gulbrandsen's patch for adding SMTPUTF8 > support. His original patch is number 4 in the series. I've just pushed this series out. Note that the option use_idn has been renamed to idn_decode, an

mutt: 5 new changesets

2015-11-24 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6527:814ece9689cc user: Kevin McCarthy date: Tue Nov 24 15:49:26 2015 -0800 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/814ece9689cc Rename idna functions and bits for smtputf8 changes. This is patch 1 of 4 implementing support for SMTPUTF8 (RFC 6531). Change mutt_idna.c to

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Will Yardley
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:28:24AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:51:39PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > > I would also love to see a better fix for quoting flowed text when > > replying using *non* flowed text. > > Bugs #3309, #3001 have a better description. FreeBSD's

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:51:39PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > As a user of mutt, I would really love to see one of the trash folder > patches make it into a release; this is a feature that most people > expect now, and I think the various arguments for why the patch is > better than just using ho

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Will Yardley
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:05:54PM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 20:01:03 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > I was originally thinking about one more 1.5.x release just to give > > more time, but I'm definitely open to just pushing straight for a > > 1.6.0 as the next

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Moritz Barsnick
Hi, I pretty much "+1" the NNTP support. Disregarding the intrusive nature of the patch, the "similarity" (I know, not "equality") of features in and the nature of SMTP and e-mail vs. NNTP make mutt an *extremely* wise choice for me as a newsreader. NNTP not being widespread anymore would indeed be

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 20:01:03 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > I was originally thinking about one more 1.5.x release just to give > more time, but I'm definitely open to just pushing straight for a > 1.6.0 as the next release. I'm all for this. Do it like Linux Torvalds: Just bump the versio

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Hello! Kevin J. McCarthy has written on Monday, 23 November, at 12:26: >Now, that's not the patch's fault: mutt doesn't have any "plugin" hooks. >It would be nice if we did, but it won't happen for 1.6.0. When I have >some more time, I'll try to look more closely at the patch and see if >ther

Re: 1.6.0 release plans

2015-11-24 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Hello! Will Yardley has written on Monday, 23 November, at 21:51: >My vote is for not including NNTP; like it or not, barely anyone >supports it anymore (even when I worked at a fairly old school >university, we phased our our NNTP servers several years ago, and all of >my ISPs have shut down