Re: Outlook.com issue

2015-08-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:30:12PM +0200, Aurélien Rivet wrote: > [2015-08-03 15:02:22] SSL error: I/O error > [2015-08-03 15:02:22] mutt_socket_write: error writing (Connexion > ré-initialisée par le correspondant), closing socket This message comes from glibc and means "Connection reset by peer"

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
David Champion wrote: > Does the attached patch work on BSD? (Please save to patch, don't use > copy/paste.) Not sure if something happened while emailing, but the patch didn't have the embedded 0x0D "\r": it got translated to 0x0A "\n". I'm re-attaching the txt2c.sh patch as an app/octet-stream

mutt: Updated French translation.

2015-08-06 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6477:711708700602 user: Vincent Lefevre date: Fri Aug 07 03:38:48 2015 +0200 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/711708700602 Updated French translation. diffs (truncated from 1228 to 950 lines): diff -r 34ca1c5fdd45 -r 711708700602 po/fr.po --- a/po/fr.po Wed Jul 2

Re: Outlook.com issue

2015-08-06 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 23:30:12 +0200, Aurélien Rivet wrote: > I know this list does not exist in order to answer to simple user's > issues but I think you are the only one who can help me. Also, users > mailing list advised me to ask this list. > My mutt can't keep an imap connection opened. I am

Re: Outlook.com issue

2015-08-06 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 11:30PM +0200 Aurélien Rivet (aurelienri...@hotmail.fr) muttered: > My mutt can't keep an imap connection opened. I am using Outlook.com > (formerly MS hotmail) as my mail provider. Did you try unsetting $imap_passive? Michael -- PGP-Key-ID: EEE7D043 Jabber: i

Outlook.com issue

2015-08-06 Thread Aurélien Rivet
Hello, I know this list does not exist in order to answer to simple user's issues but I think you are the only one who can help me. Also, users mailing list advised me to ask this list. My mutt can't keep an imap connection opened. I am using Outlook.com (formerly MS hotmail) as my mail provider.

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread David Champion
> In general I agree, but on the other hand, it seems to be easier to > maintain and also it looks like this is what other projects do as well > (e.g. git). Well, this is the first time we've maintained it. :) $ hg log -T '{node}\n' -r 'not closed() and file(txt2c.sh)' | wc -l 1 > > 1. We can

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
David Champion wrote: > I tend to avoid perl/python/etc when more basic utilities will do. It's > true that virtually every system has perl preinstalled now, but mutt > is also used on very bare-bones platforms (which is why the C version > exists; there's a C compiler by definition). Okay, sound

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 22:28:54 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > - -e 's/??/\?\?/g' \ > > I am nut sure, what was intended with the pattern, but it doesn't do > what it was supposed to: It is intended to escape trigraphs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digraphs_and_trigraphs#C --

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi David! On Do, 06 Aug 2015, David Champion wrote: > * On 06 Aug 2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > > Yeah, the sed script is not portable. Better to replace it by perl > > > (patch attached) > > > > Thanks for the patch. Is there any reason you didn't translate

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi Kevin! On Do, 06 Aug 2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > Yeah, the sed script is not portable. Better to replace it by perl > > (patch attached) > > Thanks for the patch. Is there any reason you didn't translate > > - -e 's/??/\?\?/g' \ I am nut sure, what

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread David Champion
* On 06 Aug 2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Christian Brabandt wrote: > > Yeah, the sed script is not portable. Better to replace it by perl > > (patch attached) > > Thanks for the patch. Is there any reason you didn't translate > > - -e 's/??/\?\?/g' \ > to perl? > > dgc, looks like yo

Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt

2015-08-06 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Christian Brabandt wrote: > Yeah, the sed script is not portable. Better to replace it by perl > (patch attached) Thanks for the patch. Is there any reason you didn't translate > - -e 's/??/\?\?/g' \ to perl? dgc, looks like you originally committed this, do you have any comments? --

Re: [Mutt] #3692: multipart/alternative messages don't display other attachments in body

2015-08-06 Thread Mutt
#3692: multipart/alternative messages don't display other attachments in body -+-- Reporter: ondrejj | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt|Ve

Re: [Mutt] #3762: Segmentation fault in pgp_keys when a subkey is of type "authentication"

2015-08-06 Thread Mutt
#3762: Segmentation fault in pgp_keys when a subkey is of type "authentication" -+--- Reporter: boyska | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: crypto