On 20Jun2009 11:51, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| On 2009-06-19 23:43:24 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
| > * Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| > > Whenever a user-defined variable is used in an assignment for a built-in
| > > variable or vice versa, Mutt string representations to do the
| > > assignment. As a
On 20Jun2009 07:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
| * Vincent Lefevre [06-20-09 05:52]:
| > Are these the only possibly assignments? Isn't it possible to do:
| > set my_foo=$my_bar
| > or
| > set status_format="-%r-Mutt: %f...%>-(%P)-$timeout--"
|
| Very simple to determine yourself, just try it!
On 2009-06-21 09:01:24 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> A proposed standard is just that: proposed. It is not a standard
> until it is *accepted* and "elevated" by the IETF. Proposed, Draft,
> and Internet Standards are 3 levels of maturity of specifications
> written with the *intent* of becoming st
On 2009-06-20 07:59:04 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Vincent Lefevre [06-20-09 05:52]:
> > Are these the only possibly assignments? Isn't it possible to do:
> >
> > set my_foo=$my_bar
> >
> > or
> >
> > set status_format="-%r-Mutt: %f...%>-(%P)-$timeout--"
>
> Very simple to determine
Hi,
* Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> If there is interest I can do both
> changes myself and repost a proper patch, this is a local hack for
> myself so far.
I think making it faster is always good. However, there're some more
points that would have to be solved to get the patch ready for
inclusion
Hello,
Probably for the first time I feel I'm getting satisfying performance
while opening large folders using tokyocabinet and headercache on
maildir format on cold caches (compression option enabled by default,
and maildir_header_cache_verify=no).
But with vmstat 1 I noticed that when tokyocabi
#3277: smime_keys uses obsolete perl module
-+--
Reporter: raorn| Owner: mutt-dev
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: mutt |
[Leaving this discussion out of the bug report, as it has no place
there, since it has nothing to do with the bug.]
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:09:53AM -, Mutt wrote:
> Replying to [comment:7 Derek Martin]:
> > It is likewise explicitly allowed in RFCs 2822, and 822, and 733.
> >
> > Note t
#1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc
headers
-+--
Reporter: Marco d'Itri | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: min
#3276: iswupper() replacement gets it backward
---+
Reporter: dhduvall | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: charset | Ve
4 new changesets in mutt:
http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/6447ebe80797
changeset: 5926:6447ebe80797
branch: HEAD
tag: tip
user:Rocco Rutte
date:Sat Jun 20 23:09:45 2009 +0200
summary: f=f: Don't kill signature separator when stripping trailing
spaces. Closes #3
11 matches
Mail list logo
