New changeset in mutt:
http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/888a57a2b5f2
changeset: 5018:888a57a2b5f2
tag: tip
user:Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
date:Fri Mar 23 10:32:29 2007 -0700
summary: Reset list.name before each list response in folder browser
--
Repository UR
On 2007-03-24 00:12:41 +, Paul Walker wrote:
> To be honest, I'm not even really sure why this thread is still
> going on. It's a long thread about a patch that was committed
> almost 10 days ago, and wasn't really *that* important in the
> first place.
I'd guess some people liked the enterta
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:06:04PM +, Dave wrote:
> If it only takes a millisecond to figure out why I'm wrong, why don't you
> spend the millisecond and post the results? I spent a few milliseconds on
If you could only get work done under Unix-type systems, then anyone using
Windows couldn'
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:36:16PM +, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:52:24AM +, Dave wrote:
> > That's why they want clear, simple programs, that do clear, simple
> > actions, without a long config file that by default makes decisions for
> > them in a half-assed way. Gee
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:53:08PM +, Ian Collier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:52:24AM +, Dave wrote:
> > Check this out:
> > $ cat --version
> > cat (coreutils) 5.2.1
> > Written by Torbjorn Granlund and Richard M. Stallman.
> >
> > Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:52:24AM +, Dave wrote:
> That's why they want clear, simple programs, that do clear, simple
> actions, without a long config file that by default makes decisions for
> them in a half-assed way. Gee, that's the UNIX philosophy, isn't it?
If that's the case, those pe
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:52:24AM +, Dave wrote:
> Check this out:
> $ cat --version
> cat (coreutils) 5.2.1
> Written by Torbjorn Granlund and Richard M. Stallman.
>
> Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:41:55AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-23-07 02:40]:
> [...] much verbosity removed
> > Anyway, I'm off to the DC. Peace.
>
> You should fit right in, maybe not even be noticed. Lots of smoke!
I actually fit in there quite well (but
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:25:27PM -0700, William Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:45:20PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +, Dave wrote:
> This thread is making my head hurt.
Sorry about that ... may I suggest a cup of orange juice?
> I use mutt
* Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-23-07 02:40]:
[...] much verbosity removed
> Anyway, I'm off to the DC. Peace.
You should fit right in, maybe not even be noticed. Lots of smoke!
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:45:20PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +, Dave wrote:
> > I've already explained several times that the user doesn't own the
> > system. The physical user is governed by the owner of the system.
>
> This view also completely overloo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:45:20PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> In many places, computers are shared resources, and often groups are
> collaborating. It may be that as a matter of policy, the programs
> being developed by the group must go into a directory writable by the
> group. A malicious use
12 matches
Mail list logo
