On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:36:16PM +0000, Paul Walker wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:52:24AM +0000, Dave wrote:
> > That's why they want clear, simple programs, that do clear, simple > > actions, without a long config file that by default makes decisions for > > them in a half-assed way. Gee, that's the UNIX philosophy, isn't it? > > If that's the case, those people wouldn't be using mutt in the first place. > :-) It's not like it's exactly got a short config file, or short of > options... All email programs suck; Mutt just sucks less. > > I may be nuts, but that doesn't change the fact that the UNIX philosophy > > _is_ the only game in town, if you're interested in actually getting work > > No, that's just rubbish, I'm afraid. Don't make statements that a > milliseconds thought would tell you are wrong. If it only takes a millisecond to figure out why I'm wrong, why don't you spend the millisecond and post the results? I spent a few milliseconds on it, but I guess my brain has issues, as Derek already pointed out. You're gonna have to help me out, here. . . - Dave
