3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM
> To: MP3 encoders development list
> Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the
> resultingfile
>
> OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if
Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM
> To: MP3 encoders development list
> Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the
> resultingfile
>
> OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some
> other po
-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org
[mailto:mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM
To: MP3 encoders development list
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile
OK, I was already doing in that way usin
OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some
other posibility I'll be waiting.
Thank you very much.
Joaquín
2009/8/3 Hans Meine
> Hi again!
>
> On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote:
> > Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me
Hi again!
On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote:
> Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes
> aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav
> files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Joaquin Dario
Gonzalez wrote:
> Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes
> aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav
> files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just
> one mp
Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes
aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav
files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just
one mp3 file. More files concatenated, more the total time error I have. I
t
hola usted esta equivocado, no tengo nada que ver con esto !!
Hi everybody. I'm using lame to convert a wav file whit a duration of
exactly 1.000 (one) second. The resulting mp3 last 1.045 seconds.
I need an mp3 file whit the exactly same duration of the wav file. I'm just
using the simple con
Hi!
On Monday 03 August 2009 09:16:28 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi everybody. I'm using lame to convert a wav file whit a duration of
> exactly 1.000 (one) second. The resulting mp3 last 1.045 seconds.
> I need an mp3 file whit the exactly same duration of the wav file. I'm just
> using the
Hi everybody. I'm using lame to convert a wav file whit a duration of
exactly 1.000 (one) second. The resulting mp3 last 1.045 seconds.
I need an mp3 file whit the exactly same duration of the wav file. I'm just
using the simple conversion.
lame file1.wav file1.mp3
Somebody can help me?
Thanks
I cannot find the lame that will run with audacity on mac os 10.5
can anyone tell me how to find it?
kent
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Hello,
I have a problem which I've been struggling for 2 weeks already. I have
custom encoder, which encodes audio stream for Flash Media Server using Lame
library. This stream is sent to the clients which listen to it using Flash
application.
The problem is that on the client's side a dela
sathish wrote:
> Is this what you want me to have a look at.
>
Yes, that would be great. Hopefully it will be something obvious.
Adam
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Hello Adam,
Is this what you want me to have a look at.
Hoping to hear from you soon.
kk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Heinz
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:58 PM
To: mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame
Development
Enventure Technologies Inc.,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Heinz
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:58 PM
To: mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame --decode failing to abort on garbage files
My QA guy and I have been
My QA guy and I have been running total garbage files through our
application (.jpg and .exe files renamed to .mp3) and have been
getting inconsistent error reporting from lame.
Converting 04_Bogus.mp3 to WAV...
nice lame --decode source/04_Bogus.mp3 converting/track03.wav 2>&1
Error reading head
In the German magazine iX (June/2008) is a description about liboil. Liboil
is a library of cpu optimized multimedia function.
could lame profit of it?
-alex
http://liboil.freedesktop.org/wiki/
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
h
Hi all,
I'd need some help to find the right options for lame to recognize an
input format.
All I got for now is "white" sound.
The commands that work are:
aplay -fcd test-50.cd
flac --endian=little --sign=signed --channels=2 --bps=16 \
--sample-rate=44100 tst-50.cd -o tst-50.flac
can do a bulk extract of the mp3 tags and then do a bulk restore after
you recompress with lame.
Good luck,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 8:42 AM
To: lame
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame & id
Good luck,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 8:42 AM
To: lame
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame & id3 tags
I have a bunch of mp3 files that are already tagged. I want to re-compress
them with lam
I have a bunch of mp3 files that are already tagged. I want to re-compress
them with lame to make the files smaller, but the id3 tags are lost while
encoding. Is there a way to retain id3 tags with lame?
Marty
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@mi
So I take it you are doing this for a hardware player? If so, just get
one with a big HDD and load it up with .WAV files. I think there is at
least one or two players out there that can play FLAC as well.
Chris
Richard wrote:
> I not interested in saving space... just to get the best recordi
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 6:59 pm, Alexander Strange wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Richard wrote:
> > would this be the best for sound quality
> >
> > -q 0 -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
> >
> > or
> >
> > -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
>
> Theoretically, -q0, but as nobody ever uses that
I did that test, before using my Mac, (now running linux)
and I was the one whom pick abx test 20 plus time correct between the two
joint stereo and no joint... also, that was with lame 3.9.2 or 3.9.5? it was
last year..
but could always pick the artifact that there was a hot spot in mids.,
comp
On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Richard wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply...
>
> on -m s is full stereo what happen to normal stereo ?
> don't want joint stereo... bad idea
>
> I know you going to say its great, but its not.
> case in point take white rabbit song recorded by Jefferson Airplane
>
Thanks for the quick reply...
on -m s is full stereo what happen to normal stereo ?
don't want joint stereo... bad idea
I know you going to say its great, but its not.
case in point take white rabbit song recorded by Jefferson Airplane back
in the late 60's ( joint stereo ) kill that song, due to
On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Richard wrote:
>
> isn't -m -s means force stereo (L & R) or normal stereo as recorded ?
-m s forces "full stereo", which is always worse than "joint stereo",
the default.
> and why not -p for error correction ?
Nothing really wrong with it, but where are you exp
On Nov 8, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Richard wrote:
> would this be the best for sound quality
>
> -q 0 -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
>
> or
>
> -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
Theoretically, -q0, but as nobody ever uses that option you can't be
sure.
That is a very strange combination of options.
Do yo
would this be the best for sound quality
-q 0 -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
or
-b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
---
Thanks -
Rich
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Hello Friends
I face a peculiar problem with 'lame' especially if used with '-V 0 -q 0', all
of a sudden the machine suddenly goes off. The CPU is Athlon 1800+, a pretty
old machine, with Asrock K7Nx motherboard. Os is SuSE 10.
Even when using in conjunction with 'mencoder', this gives problems
What version Perl are you running?
I just ran it on my machine and it worked fine.
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.7 built for i486-linux
Hope this helps.
> hmm, i got this error trying to run the perl script:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ./lame.pl
> unknown warnings category 'File::Find'
>
> Did you write a script called /tmp/z with these contents and make it
> executable?
I made a script called z and put it in the /tmp/ directory, with the script
that you gave me, then i set the file permissions to 755.
> > #!/bin/sh
> > > infile=$1
> > > dir=`dirname $infile`
> > > base=`basen
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:01:08AM -0400, Ken wrote:
> I'm getting this error when it try to run your script:
> "find: /tmp/z: No such file or directory"
> and the command I'm running it with, not sure if this is right,
> find /home/www.site.com/members/ -name '*.mp3' -exec /tmp/z {} \;
> thanks a
I often use grep in conjunction with "find" and "xargs". Check out xargs, it
might do exactly what you want or at least some of it.
On 8/4/06, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting this error when it try to run your script:
> "find: /tmp/z: No such file or directory"
>
> and the command I
I'm getting this error when it try to run your script:
"find: /tmp/z: No such file or directory"
and the command I'm running it with, not sure if this is right,
find /home/www.site.com/members/ -name '*.mp3' -exec /tmp/z {} \;
thanks again,
-Ken
On 8/3/06, Warren Toomey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
hmm, i got this error trying to run the perl script:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ./lame.pl
unknown warnings category 'File::Find' at ./lame.pl line 8
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./lame.pl line 8.
so I guess 'File::Find' isn't installed? but i can't remember the commands
to install it, i ha
ah, i've got it, had to initialize cpan first:-P
On 8/4/06, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hmm, i got this error trying to run the perl script:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ./lame.pl
> unknown warnings category 'File::Find' at ./lame.pl line 8
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./lame.p
awesome! thanks guys!
I'll try that this morning.
cheers,
-Ken
On 8/3/06, Stephen Swinsburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heres the perl equivalent:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
>
> #
> # script to process all mp3 files under a given directory or directories
> #
>
> use File::Find;
> no warnings 'Fil
Heres the perl equivalent:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#
# script to process all mp3 files under a given directory or directories
#
use File::Find;
no warnings 'File::Find';
#the @array holds the dirs you want to search, you can specify
multiple dirs here or just one,
#uncomment appropriate one
[EMAIL
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:29:12PM -0400, Ken wrote:
> such I've added code to re-encode mp3's as they are being uploaded, but all
> for the existing mp3's, is it possible in the Linux shell to use maybe grep
> or something to go though all the folders and re-encode every single mp3 one
> at a time
hmm, i don't really know perl, though i know php/asp/vb very well.
but i thought that maybe i could just use grep to find the files and parse
the names into the lame command line.
On 8/3/06, Stephen Swinsburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
> Probably easiest to write a quick perl script
Hi Ken,
Probably easiest to write a quick perl script to search through the
directories and encode each one it finds with your settings.
Hint: Use the File::Find module and give it the top most directory
and it will recurse through every directory it finds.
Hope this helps!
Steve
On 04/08/
Hello,
I'm new to the list, and new to lame, but i love it so far!! it's exactly
what we need for our web site.
I'm posting because I'm wondering how this can be done.
I've got about 30 gig's of mp3's on our web site ( all legal! ), all the
mp3's are in folders for the bands they belong too, we'd
Thomas Orgis a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> While hacking around with mpg123 to get rid of encoder/decoder delay and
> padding I stumbled over lame apparently removing samples when using
> --resample. I assume that this indeed should work (or is it experimental?).
>
> I documented my (days of) work at
>
Hi!
While hacking around with mpg123 to get rid of encoder/decoder delay and
padding I stumbled over lame apparently removing samples when using --resample.
I assume that this indeed should work (or is it experimental?).
I documented my (days of) work at
http://mpg123.orgis.org/lame-re
Hi all,
Could someone confirm the latest (recommended) LAME build please? It still
has 3.96.1 as the latest on http://lame.sourceforge.net/ but I've heard it
is now 3.97b2?
Is this correct, and could someone point me to some official documentation
regarding this?
Thank you all very much.
Ed Un
Resend/Wrong subject/Sorry
---
Hi
Which version of LAME is recommented nowadays ?
I've been using 3.93 for a long time.
Is there any serious errors in terms of sound quality in this version
that I should be aware of ?
Another question
How should the VBR encoding output from LAME be interpr
You should try to encode text files as raw pcm files, because
they lack a wav header ;-) At least this avoid the
complaint about corrupt files. And if your quality setting
is good enought you might be able to decode a somewhat readable
text file.
martin
dipankar das wrote:
> I am reporting a queer
I am reporting a queer and funny thing about 'lame' and text files.
I ran 'cdparanoia' on an audio cd and kept the details in a file called
music.txt in the same directory. Then ran 'lame -V 0 -q 0' on every i in the
directory, though, by mistake, in place of '*.wav' i ran it on '*'.
And the
I meant only non-audio headers. Audio headers are still there with
their correspondent Audio frames. I think I already "solved" (patched) this
problem, however, I was trying to make sure I did use a more efficient
method. When I use Lame with reencoding options and -t the program will get
rid of th
Luis,
Not sure if you should remove the headers. How would the frame be played
back without header info?
On 3/12/06, Warren Toomey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:58:40AM -, s niazi wrote:
> > Please Visit:
> > [annoying URL]
>
> That list member will be mode
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:58:40AM -, s niazi wrote:
> Please Visit:
> [annoying URL]
That list member will be moderated in the future.
Apologies for the spam,
Warren
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
http://minnie.
Please Visit:
http://www.diabetics.blogspot.com/
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 Luis Cordova wrote :
>I am doing reencoding of mp3 files to different bitrate and samplerate.
>When I have set option -t I am getting rid of the info tags lame attaches to
>the file by default.
>
>STILL, when I open the file I
I am doing reencoding of mp3 files to different bitrate and samplerate.
When I have set option -t I am getting rid of the info tags lame attaches to
the file by default.
STILL, when I open the file I see a "Lame X.XX (beta) " label at the end
of the stream/file.
My objective is to have an out
I would like to be able to copy from (album or cassette),using Sound
Studio 3, to mp3 format.
Sound Studio offers a link to Lame.framework. I have been unable to
build this install. I keep
getting 1 error that says: Info.plist (no such file or directory).
I've followed the instructions to
Try to check the file by openig it in a hex editor. See if the BOM
characther is present for Unicode.
On 12/31/05, Kyle Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just joined the list, and I sent this email. However, I never received a
> copy, so I'm thinking that I sent it too early and I was not app
I just joined the list, and I sent this email. However, I never received a
copy, so I'm thinking that I sent it too early and I was not approved yet or
something. So, if this is a duplicate for people, I apologize. Now, on to the
email:
I'm running the latest LAME on Windows XP. I have created
hi, i want to porting lame for arm-linux, anyone can help me on that?
And , please tell me how many MIPS needed to do a mp3 encoder for
arm-linux? thanks
-- LEE
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinf
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Arromdee)
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame problem
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
> First, the ACM directory in the source distro is bad. ACM is empty and acm
> (lower case) contains the contents, making the Linux compile not work until
> you rename i
Using Lame 3.97:
First, the ACM directory in the source distro is bad. ACM is empty and acm
(lower case) contains the contents, making the Linux compile not work until
you rename it.
Second, I've been having a problem decoding a particular file. (It seems, from
searching the web, that someone e
Well, just started to use Lame 3.95 for the Mac OS X
and having a few problems, with setting, of getting the right sound.
My usual method is iTunes mp3 rip @ 256 vbr / quality excellent / stereo
produces a nice mp3.
However, was wonder if I could produce a better mp3 rip, with a
simular setting w
Joe Auty a écrit :
lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3
The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at
22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong with
this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments?
-s is an option to speci
anyway. Is there something wrong
with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate
arguments?
On May 12, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote:
From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005
Khz anyway. Is there something wrong
> with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments?
>
>
> On May 12, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote:
>
> > From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and
11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote:
From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500
How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much
older version of Lame, or is there a fix with
From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500
> How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much
> older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version?
LAM
Hello,
When I encode mp3s using Lame 3.96.1 --abr 56 and import these files
into software such as Flash, these files play back sounding like a
chipmunk (i.e. the pitch is too high). When I encode the same files
using Lame 3.93 using the same arguments (i.e. --abr 56) I don't have
this probl
They can. The RIFF format,which is what a .wav file is, has them but few
vendors support them.
At 03:17 PM 4/18/2005, you wrote:
I don't think wave files can contain metadata tags.
Thanks,
Patrice
--- J7N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > generated mp3 file contains undesired parasite
> soun
I don't think wave files can contain metadata tags.
Thanks,
Patrice
--- J7N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > generated mp3 file contains undesired parasite
> sound.
>
> It may sound too simple. But aren't there any
> trailer info present
> in your wave file, like metadata tags of artist,
hi there,
i'm using Lame-enc DLL to encode a mono wave file (PCM
16bit 16kHz) into a mono mp3 file. everything seems to
be ok except that the last few seconds of the
generated mp3 file contains undesired parasite sound.
I use the same code given in the example and have the
flags OK (see below). is
- Original Message -
From: "Catucci, Raymond A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame for Amiga
After searching for the lame program for classic amiga (OS3.9) I ended up
on
your site. Can yo
Hi,
After searching for the lame program for classic amiga (OS3.9) I ended up on
your site. Can you direct me to a place that I can download the appropriate
version of the software?
My e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Ray
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only
Hi, Kim.
From: "Kim S. Andreasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Antwort: [mp3encoder] Lame & national chars
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:57:57 +0100
> The solution (well, I would rather call it a woraround...) to the problem
> consists of two quite easy steps:
>
S. Andreasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame & national chars
> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:05:11 +0100
>
> > I can't get Lame (3.92 & 3.96) to dance with sound files having
non-English characters in their names. It simply ignores such files.
> &g
Hi all,
I'm new to this forum, and new to lame too for that matter.
I've noticed that when I use 'lame -h [filename].wav', a 128 kb/s mp3
file is produced. But when I use 'mlame -h *.wav', the bitrate of the
mp3's produced are many and varied. What is the reason for this?
Also, I've only used
minnie.tuhs.org'"
Kopie:
(Blindkopie: Michi Koch/WET/COMP/PHILIPS)
Thema:
[mp3encoder] Lame & national chars
From: "Kim S. Andreasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame & national chars
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:05:11 +0100
> I can't get Lame (3.92 & 3.96) to dance with sound files having non-English
> characters in their names. It simply ignores such file
Hi,
I am brand new to this list, but I hope that somebody's able to help me:
I can't get Lame (3.92 & 3.96) to dance with sound files having non-English
characters in their names. It simply ignores such files.
The same goes for ID3 tags. At best they get converted (my guess is that the
MSB gets
Xscale CPU.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Edwards
John-BLUW23
Sent: Mon 10/25/2004 5:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [mp3encoder] LAME on a PDA
Dear all,
I would like to know if anyone has recompiled the LAME front end for
use on an HP
Dear all,
I would like to know if anyone has recompiled the LAME front end for use on an HP iPAQ
4150 (Xscale) PDA. I only need a command line interface, not a GUI, so if this is not
possible but there are other alternatives out there then please let me know.
Thanks very much,
John
_
Geoff Shang wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> The quality scale was reorganised between those releases. If memory
> serves, what was quality 2 is now quality 3, with the quality 0 mode now
> painstakingly slow. I use 0 if quality matters and I have the time, but
> mostly I use 1 which is, at least in my exper
Hi:
The quality scale was reorganised between those releases. If memory
serves, what was quality 2 is now quality 3, with the quality 0 mode now
painstakingly slow. I use 0 if quality matters and I have the time, but
mostly I use 1 which is, at least in my experience 4-5 times faster than 0
(
I recently upgraded to the latest LAME, and found that encoding had
gotten much, much slower:
LAME 3.96.1: takes 9:21 to convert a 4:37 WAV to an MP3.
LAME 3.92: takes 0:40 to do the same.
That's 0.49x versus 6.92x -- a slowdown of 14x.
I downloaded and compiled successive non-beta versions of
hong yuan wrote:
>
> ./configure --enable-nasm
> and make it again
Thanks, but nothing seems to change.
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
What is the status of the x86_64 asm optimizations?
From: hong yuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MP3 encoders development list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MP3 encoders development list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame for Linux is slower than Windows
Date: Fri, 1
--- Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的正文：
> Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is
> slower than its
> conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that
> Lame for Windows
> recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some
> optimizations, while Lame
> for Linux doesn't. Has anybody else
Geoff Shang wrote:
Luca wrote:
Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is slower than its
conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that Lame for Windows
recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some optimizations, while
Lame for Linux doesn't. Has anybody else noticed something
Luca wrote:
Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is slower than its
conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that Lame for Windows
recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some optimizations, while Lame for
Linux doesn't. Has anybody else noticed something like that?
Has your
Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is slower than its
conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that Lame for Windows
recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some optimizations, while Lame
for Linux doesn't. Has anybody else noticed something like that?
Thanks in advance fo
I have a problem with LAME creating "static" noise in MP3's it is creating
from a WAV file. This doesn't happen on every PC, and it doesn't happen
every time - even when called with the same command line parameters. An
example of the noise is here:
http://www.nerosoft.com/download/LameNoise.mp3
Hi!
I am new to Audioprogramming, so forgive me if this has been explained
already elsewhere. I didn`t find it in the mail archive.
I want to program an on the fly mp3 encoder under Linux. I record from a
microphone (/dev/dsp) a buffer of 30 bytes. This happens in a thread.
Another thread the
Hi,
LAME 3.96.1 has been released. It's mainly fixing an occasional
crash when using --vbr-new, as used by --preset fast standard.
I would suggest upgrading to 3.96.1 if you are using the newer
vbr routine of LAME.
Ciao Robert
___
mp3encoder mailing l
I've never made any direct encoding using the digital stream.
What i do, is to take the audio from digital devices (in my case S/PDIF) and
record it to a wave file. Them, i do the encoding with lame.
This work fine since waves don't differentiate bettewn digital/analog.
But you must be carefull, i
Do any body know if Lame encoding works perfectly with digital
audio/video captured form a firewire device?
I noticed it works better when I capture from analog devices.
When I do streaming of audio and video the data synchronization captured
from firewire goes haywire but the analog devices wor
I recall something about it leaving room for a VBR header, even if the
encoding is not VBR. This was discussed here some time back when I was
trying to figure out why my Sony MP3 boombox was choking on files created
with LAME.
Chris
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:12:59 -0500, Dennis Hining wrote:
> When
When using Lame to encode a wav to MP3 file, the lame encoder inserts
several bytes before the first MP3 frame. Does anyone know where I can find
what these bytes mean, i.e., the structure of the Lame Header before the
first MP3 frame.
___
mp3encoder ma
y Startsev
Cc: MP3 Encoder Liste
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] LAME Encoder with Delphi Help
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:00:38 +0400
"Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MP3 encoders development list"
>
Hello, Gabe!
You wrote to "MP3 encoders development list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Thu, 3 Jun 2004 12:38:57 -0700:
GH> Does anyone have a reliable (and multi-threaded capable) COM wrapper
GH> for the LAME DLL? I've got a web application that compresses uploaded
GH> MP3's to a standard bitrate and
Does anyone have a reliable (and multi-threaded capable) COM wrapper for the
LAME DLL? I've got a web application that compresses uploaded MP3's to a
standard bitrate and calling the LAME executable from the command line on a
windows platform seems to hang and not terminate properly under high load
y Startsev
Cc: MP3 Encoder Liste
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] LAME Encoder with Delphi Help
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:00:38 +0400
"Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MP3 encoders development list"
>
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
