no)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:00 AM
> To: Ian Norton
> Cc: mono-list@lists.ximian.com; monolithic1
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Not able to verify integrity of download
>
> > From: Ian Norton [mailto:inor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:29 AM
>
: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:00 AM
To: Ian Norton
Cc: mono-list@lists.ximian.com; monolithic1
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Not able to verify integrity of download
> From: Ian Norton [mailto:inor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:29 AM
>
> I think our friend is wondering i
> From: Ian Norton [mailto:inor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:29 AM
>
> I think our friend is wondering if our stable archive is trusted. if someone
> hasn't snuck in and inserted some nasty in the released tarball.
> I for one think that xamarin really really need to sha2 and si
Yes, Mr. Norton, you have captured my concern. It is often difficult to
write in a way that the reader understands the writer's intent. So, yes,
I'm looking for a way to confirm that the download I receive is the
officially authorized release from the authorized devs. This kind of
verification i
I think our friend is wondering if our stable archive is trusted. if
someone hasn't snuck in and inserted some nasty in the released tarball.
I for one think that xamarin really really need to sha2 and sign the
released stable sources!
On 11 Mar 2014 02:52, "Edward Ned Harvey (mono)" <
edward.harv
> From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-
> boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of monolithic1
> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 8:03 PM
>
> My search in the forums for "SHA", "verify" or "signing" did not provide me
> any information on how to verify the integrity of the MONO
Based on the lack of response, I can only deduce that either:
1) I have posted to the wrong forum, or
2) I have such a challenging question that it cannot be answered by mere
mortals :) or
3) I have inadvertently offended the group, or
4) The right person has not yet seen my post in order to resp
