Good questions!
I proposed that it belongs in the XML namespace because, depending on its
usage, it is essentially (a) an XML variant, or (b) an XML
authoring/visualization tool. Of course I'm open to guidance here -
any alternatives in mind?
I guess was thinking of putting in XML::Terse rather
Sure, I would actually prefer tXML to XML::Terse but that form implies
that there is something of an aversion to new top-level namespaces. It
hasn't been discussed on mailing lists yet - just using it internally
right now.
- Jon
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, A. Bergman wrote:
> I don't really like th
Sure thing. I'll fire up a post. (Is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the de facto standard one?)
- Jon
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, A. Bergman wrote:
>
> On tisdag, feb 11, 2003, at 20:00 Europe/Stockholm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Sure, I would actually prefer tXML to XML::Terse but that form implies
> >
