Sure thing. I'll fire up a post. (Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the de facto standard one?)
- Jon On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, A. Bergman wrote: > > On tisdag, feb 11, 2003, at 20:00 Europe/Stockholm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Sure, I would actually prefer tXML to XML::Terse but that form implies > > that there is something of an aversion to new top-level namespaces. It > > hasn't been discussed on mailing lists yet - just using it internally > > right now. > > > > - Jon > > > > > > > > I think this might warrant a new namespace, but I think it should be > discussed or mentioned on one of the perl-xml mailing lists. > > Arthur > >
