Name: Paul J. Lucas
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-ID:CPJL
Planning to contribute: http://www.best.com/~pjl/software/html_tree/
Name DSLI Description Info
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> Someone (CPJL) just uploaded a dist to CPAN called HTML_Tree (in full,
> "HTML_Tree-1.2.3.tar.gz") including a module HTML::Tree. Am I the
> only one who thinks this risks confusion with me and Gisle Aas's
> preexisting HTML-Tree dist?
Unfortu
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> We do give our opinions, and in my opinion, as a module-power-that-is, I
> think your name is bad and should be changed.
Noted.
> I suggest HTML-TreeC / HTML::TreeC or something, if you are really set on it.
It's not written in C. Inci
On 8 Nov 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> I wrote:
> >HTML_TreeC++ is not a valid identifier.
>
> Cplusplus, C_plus_plus, Cxx, ...
Too ugly.
> I wouldn't apply this rule to your project, but I also have considered
> HTML::Tree already taken by Sean although his module is really ca
On 9 Nov 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> >So why doesn't his filename match? It looks like the problem
> >isn't really my problem after all.
>
> Good catch, but this has been stated before. The solution is obvious,
> but it affects you. So if we apply the obvious solution, it will be
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> You are arguing at one time against confusion,
I'm not arguing anything. I never started this whole argument.
> but here you are advocating more confusion, by changing the names of
> established distributions. Yes, it is a problem that his dis
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> I wrote:
> >So essentially I'm being asked to pay for his mistake of
> >misnaming his module/distribution ...
> If that is how you prefer to see it, then yes. Though I don't see it as
> being a price to pay. I see it as action to take, but the action i
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> If time is the issue, you could have done it already in the time you've spent
> explaining why you don't want to.
1. You underestimate the amount of work that needs to be done.
2. Fine: I will get more and more terse in my replies.
> I
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> I'm not sure what you were looking for from [EMAIL PROTECTED], if
> not the best-considered advice of some people that have been helping
> manage a large and successful software repository.
People get Perl modules from CPAN. If one dist
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 11:16 -0800 2000.11.09, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> > I'm simply too busy not to deal with this issue.
>
> You have shown you have no desire whatsoever to cooperate, to follow
> the advice of the people running the CPAN, and to
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> >There was an implication of "now." It does /not/ say
> >that I will be too busy /forever/.
>
> Analyses de texte aside, what are you actually going to do, and when are
> you actually going to do it?
I don't know.
- Paul
11 matches
Mail list logo
